Abstract
The constructivist metaphor is fundamentally based on the idea of an intentional cognizing agent who builds mental structures that allows him-/herself to cope with the world, that is, the mental structures are selected in terms of their viability rather than the quality of their correspondence with an outside world. Because of the tight link between intentionality and agency, constructivism is unable to explain a range of phenomena that have come to be known as the abyss between plans and situated action, theory and practice. In this chapter, I use these two examples from my empirical work among research scientists as the data for a reflection about the source of the abyss between plans and situated action, leading me to theorize the gap.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roth, WM. (2011). Radical Uncertainty in Acting. In: Passibility. Classics in Science Education, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1908-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1908-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1907-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1908-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)