Advertisement

Enhanced Resource Efficiency with Packaging Steel

  • Evelyne Frauman
  • Norbert Hatscher
Conference paper

Abstract

Packaging steel is used for the safe and efficient distribution of different products worldwide. In the long line of improvement of steel packaging the total volume of canned products per tonne of packaging steel has increased dramatically in the last 50 years. This result is directly linked to a better use of the resources necessary for making packaging steel. The recycling rate for packaging steel in the EU is now over 70%. Efficient recycling can be seen as a multi-use system from the material point of view. The recycling of the core material enables the industry to avoid a CO2 burden in the production route. These above mentioned characteristics have to be taken into account when studying the life cycle of packaging steel. Resource efficiency has direct effects on other life cycle parameters such as greenhouse gas emissions or energy use. This will be shown in some examples. An outlook for future developments will be given as well.

Keywords

Life Cycle Assessment Life Cycle Analysis Recycling Rate Steel Scrap Canned Product 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Robertson G (2006) Food Packaging Principles and Practice. Taylor and Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Schüler K (2009) Aufkommen und Verwertung von Verpackungsabfällen in Deutschland im Jahr 2008.Umweltbundesamt, DessauGoogle Scholar
  3. <http://www.apeal.org> (accessed 16.03.2011)
  4. Brimacombe L, Coleman N,Honess C (2005) Recycling, reuse and the sustainability of steel.MilleniumSteel InternationalGoogle Scholar
  5. <http://www.worldsteel.org> (accessed 16.03.2011)
  6. BUWAL (1998)Ökoinventare für Verpackungen.Band 1, Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 250/1, Abfälle, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft BernGoogle Scholar
  7. Anonymous (1993)Shelf-life of foods: Guidelines for its determination and prediction.Institute of Food Science and Technology, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 0.
    Oldring PKT,Nehring U (2007) Packaging Materials 7- Metal packaging for foodstuffs. International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI)Google Scholar
  9. 1.
    ButerbaughCP, McGrath MC, Novotny JK, Voss ZT, Brunner JM,PeasleeKD (2007)Life cycle greenhouse gas emission comparison of steel products with other materials.Association for Iron   Steel Technology AIST,AISTech Conference, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  10. 2.
    Buchart-KorolD (2011)Significance of environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) method in the iron and steel industry.Metalurgija50(3):205–208.Google Scholar
  11. 3.
    Zhang X, Su X, Huang Z (2007)Comparison of LCA on steel and concreteconstruction office buildings: a case study<http://www.inive.org/members_area/medias/pdf/Inive%5CIAQVEC2007%5CZhang_4.pdf>(accessed 17.03.2011)
  12. 6.
    Sustainability Report of the world steel industry (2008)<http://www.worldsteel.org/pictures/publicationfiles/Sustainability%20Report%202008_English.pdf >(accessed 08.04.2011)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Association of European Producers of Steel for Packaging (APEAL)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Stahlinstitut VDEh im Stahl-ZentrumDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations