Advertisement

Carbon Footprint of Beverage Packaging in the United Kingdom

  • Haruna Gujba
  • Adisa Azapagic
Conference paper

Abstract

The food and drinks sector is the major user of packaging in the UK, accounting for 70% of the total. With the consumption of packaging in the UK estimated at over ten million tonnes, the life cycle environmental impacts of packaging could be significant. This work focuses on drinks packaging and estimates the carbon footprint of packaging used for five types of beverage in the UK: fruit juice, water, milk, beer and wine. The types of packaging considered are: carton; glass, PET and HDPE bottles; and aluminium and steel cans. The results show that the carton packaging has the lowest carbon footprint ranging from 90-111kg CO2e/1000 litres of beverage and glass bottle the highest, from 150-761kg CO2e/1,000 litres. A significant variation has been found in the carbon footprint for the same type of packaging material, mainly influenced by the size and weight of the containers and the recycling rates. The manufacture of raw materials and the packaging are the main hot spots for all packaging.

Keywords

Carbon Footprint Energy Recovery HDPE Bottle Life Cycle Environmental Impact Lower Carbon Footprint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, DEFRA (2005) Producer responsibility obligations (packaging waste) regulations 1997 (as amended), <http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/waste/producer/packaging/documents/package-datanote.pdf>
  2. Keynote (2003) Packaging (food   drink) industry.<http://www.keynote.co.uk/market-intelligence/view/product>
  3. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, DEFRA (2009) Making the most of packaging: a strategy for a low-carbon economy.<http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/waste/producer/packaging/documents/full-packaging-strategy.pdf>
  4. WRAP (2008) Lightweighting the can pack, Waste and Resources ActionProgramme. <http://www.wrap.org.uk/downloads/Lightweighting_the_can_pack_FINAL1.50658f00.5891.pdf>
  5. ISO 14044 (2006): Environmental management - life cycle assessment -requirements and guidelines, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. PE International (2009) GaBi 4.3 software and database for Life Cycle Engineering, <http://www.gabi-software.com/uk-ireland/software/gabi-4/>
  7. Ecoinvent Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories (2007) Ecoinvent Database v 2.0. DübendorfGoogle Scholar
  8. EU JRC (2009), European Reference Life Cycle Data System (ELCD) v. 1.0.1. 2007.Google Scholar
  9. Waste and Resources Action Programme, WRAP (2007) Using recycled content in plastic packaging: the benefits. <http://www.wrap.org.uk/downloads/Using_recycled_content_in_plastic_packaging_the_benefits.996bf005.3597.pdf>
  10. 1.
    Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, DEFRA (2009) Packaging: achievement statistics. <http://www.defra.gov.uk/ environment/waste/producer/packaging/data.htm>
  11. 2.
    Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, DEFRA (2007) Incineration of municipal solid waste. <http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/waste/wip/newtech/pdf/incineration.pdf>
  12. 3.
    Waste Online (2005) Packaging recycling information sheet. <http://www.wasteonline.org.uk/resources/InformationSheets/Packaging.htm>

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations