Advertisement

Akoma-Ntoso for Legal Documents

  • Monica PalmiraniEmail author
  • Fabio Vitali
Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 4)

Abstract

This chapter aims to collocate Akoma Ntoso into the historical scenario of the legal XML schemas and to define the pillars of the Akoma Ntoso architecture. Second goal is to present the basic elements of Akoma Ntoso XML standard and how it can be used for marking up a legal document respecting a clear subdivision between the semantic layer of the knowledge embedded into the document.

References

  1. 1.
    Barabucci, G., L. Cervone, A. Di Iorio, M. Palmirani, S. Peroni, and F. Vitali. 2010. Managing semantics in XML vocabularies: an experience in the legal and legislative domain. Presented at Balisage: The Markup Conference 2010, Montréal, Canada, August 3–6, vol. 5. In Proceedings of Balisage: The Markup Conference 2010. Balisage Series on Markup Technologies.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bekiari, C., M. Doerr, and P. Le Boeuf. 2008. International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonization. FRBR object-oriented definition and mapping to FRBRER (v. 0.9 draft). http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/frbr_oo /frbr_docs/FRBR_oo_V0.9.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2009.
  3. 3.
    Boer, A., R. Winkels, and Vitali, F. 2008. MetaLex XML and the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format. In Proceedings of Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies, 21–41. Springer.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breuker, J., A. Boer, R. Hoekstra, and C. Van Den Berg. 2006. Developing content for LKIF: Ontologies and framework for legal reasoning. In Legal knowledge and information systems, JURIX 2006, 41–50. Amsterdam: ISO Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breuker, J., P. Casanovas, M.C.A. Klein, and E. Francesconi. 2009. Law, ontologies and the semantic web—channelling the legal information flood. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gordon, Thomas, F. 2008. Constructing legal arguments with rules in the legal knowledge interchange format (LKIF). In Computable models of the law, languages, dialogues, games, ontologies, 162–184. Springer.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jelliffe R. The Schematron Assertion Language 1.5. http://www.ascc.net/xml/resource/schematron/Schematron2000. Accessed 20 June 2009.
  8. 8.
    Klarlund, N., A. Moller, and M.I. Schwartzbach. 2000. DSD: A Schema Language for XML. In Proceedings of the third workshop on Formal methods in software practice, Portland.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lupo, C., F. Vitali, E. Francesconi, M. Palmirani, R. Winkels, E. de Maat, A. Boer, and P. Mascellani. 2007. General xml format(s) for legal sources—Estrella European Project IST-2004-027655. Deliverable 3.1, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murata, M. 2009. RELAX (REgular LAnguage description for XML). http://www.xml.gr.jp/relax, 2000. Accessed 20 June 2009.
  11. 11.
    Palmirani, M., G. Contissa, and R. Rubino. 2009. Fill the gap in the legal knowledge modelling. RuleML2009 proceeding, 305–314.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sartor, G. 2005. Legal reasoning: A cognitive approach to the law. Vol. 5. Treatise on Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vitali, F. 2009. Akoma Ntoso release notes. http://www.akomantoso.org. Accessed 20 August 2009.
  14. 14.
    Vitali, F., and F. Zeni. 2007. Towards a country-independent data format: The Akoma-Ntoso experience. In Proceedings of the V legislative XML workshop, 67–86. Florence, Italy: European Press Academic Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Law CIRSFIDUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations