Assessment of Land Use/Land Cover Using Geospatial Techniques in a Semi-arid Region of Madhya Pradesh, India

  • Prafull Singh
  • Jay Krishna Thakur
  • Suyash Kumar
  • U. C. Singh


The Earth's land cover characteristics and its use are key variables in global change. The society today is already in the mainstream of another revolution - the information revolution. This brings enormous changes to life and living, providing new approaches: how to advance the frontiers of previous revolutions particularly those of earth resources mapping and monitoring. Over the last few decades, there has been a significant change on land use and land cover (LULC) across the globe due to the climatic changes and over demand of the growing inhabitants. Semi-arid regions are undergoing severe stresses due to the combined effects of growing population and climate change (Mukherjee et al., 2009). In the last three decades, the technologies and methods of remote sensing have progressed significantly. Now a days remote sensing data, along with increased resolution from satellite platforms, makes these technology appear poised to make better impact on land resource management initiatives involved in monitoring LULC mapping and change detection at varying spatial ranges (Singh et al., 2010; Thakur, 2010). Remote sensing technology offers collection and analysis of data from ground-based, space and Earth-orbiting platforms, with linkages to Global Positioning System (GPS) and geographic information system (GIS) data with promising modelling capabilities (Franklin, 2001; Thakur et al., 2010). This has made remote sensing valuable for land cover and land use information.


Land Cover Global Position System Remote Sensing Geospatial Technology National Remote Sensing Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balak, Ram and Kolarkar, A.S. (1993). Remote sensing application in monitoring land use changes in arid region of Rajasthan. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(17), 3191-3200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaudhary, B.S., Saroha, G.P. and Yadav, Manoj (2008). Human induced land use/ land cover changes in Northern part of Gurgaon district, Haryana, India. Journal of Human Ecology, 23(3), 243-252.Google Scholar
  3. Chaurasia, R. and Sharma, P.K. (1999). Land Use/Land Cover Mapping and Change Detection using Satellite Data—A Case Study of Dehlon Block, District Ludhiana, Punjab. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 27(2), 115-121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, D. and Stow, D. (2002). The effect of training strategies on supervised classification at different spatial resolutions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68, 1155-1161.Google Scholar
  5. Cihlar (2000). Land cover mapping of large areas from satellites: status and research priorities. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(6&7), 1093-1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dhinwa, P.S., Pathak, S.K., Sastry, S.V.C., Rao, M., Majumdar, K.L., Chotani, M.L., Singh, P. J. and Sinha, R.L.P. (1992). Land use change analysis of Bharatpur District using GIS. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 20(4), 237-250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diouf, A. and Lambin, E.F. (2001). Monitoring land-cover changes in semi-arid regions: remote sensing data and field observations in the Ferlo, Senegal. Journal of Arid Environments, 48(2), 129-148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foody, M.G. (2002). Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8, 185-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franklin, S.E. (2001). Remote Sensing for Sustainable Forest Management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gautam, N.C. and Channiah, C.H. (1985). Land use and land cover mapping and change detection in Tripura using satellite Landsat data. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 6(3&4), 517-528.Google Scholar
  11. Glackin, D.L. (1998). International space-based remote sensing overview: 1980-2007. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, 307-314.Google Scholar
  12. Jaiswal, R.K., Saxena, R. and Mukherjee, S. (1999). Application of remote sensing technology for landuse/landcover change analysis. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 27, 123-128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Javed, Akram, Khanday, M.Y. and Ahmed, Rizwan (2009). Prioritization of sub- watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37(2), 261-274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jensen, J.R. (1996). Introductory Digital Image Processing, Second Edition. Prentice- hall Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  15. Jensen, J.R. and Cowen, D.J. (1999). Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65, 611-622.Google Scholar
  16. Kumar, Vijay, Rai, S.P. and Rathore, D.S. (2004). Land use mapping of Kandi Belts of Jammu Region. Journal of Indian Society of Remote, 32(4), 323-328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kunwar, P., Kachhwaha, T.S., Kumar, Anil, Agrawal, A.K., Singh, A.N. and Mendiratta, Nisha (2010). Use of high-resolution IKONOS data and GIS technique for transformation of landuse/landcover for sustainable development. Current Science, 98(2), 204-212.Google Scholar
  18. Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W. and Chipman, J.W. (2008). Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  19. Lu, D. and Weng, Q. (2007). A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(5), 823-870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merem, E.C. and Twumasi, Y.A. (2008). Using Geospatial Information Technology in Natural Resources Management: The Case of Urban Land Management in West Africa. Sensors, 8, 607-619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mukherjee, S., Shashtri, S., Singh, C., Srivastava, P. and Gupta, M. (2009). Effect of canal on land use/land cover using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37(3), 527-537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. National Remote Sensing Agency (1989). Manual of Nation wide Land use/Land cover Mapping using satellite imagery, Part I. NRSA, Hyderabad.Google Scholar
  23. National Remote Sensing Agency (1995). IMSD Technical Guidelines. National Remote Sensing.Google Scholar
  24. NRSA (2005). Integrated Mission for Sustainable Development. Technical Guidelines, Hyderabad.Google Scholar
  25. Palaniswami, C., Upadhyay, A.K. and Maheswarappa, H.P. (2006). Spectral Mixture Analysis for sub pixel classification of coconut. Current Science, 91(12), 17061711.Google Scholar
  26. Raghavswamy, V., Pathan, S.K., Ram, Mohan, P., Bhanderi, R.J., Padma, Priya (2005). IRS-IC applications for urban planning and development. Current Science, 70, 582-588.Google Scholar
  27. Ranjeet, J., Jiquan, Chen, Nan, Lu, Ke, Guo, Cunzhu, Liang, Yafen, Wei et al. (2008). Predicting plant diversity based on remote sensing products in the semi-arid region of Inner Mongolia. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(5), 2018-2032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rao, D.P., Gautam, N.C., Nagaraja, R. and Ram, M.P. (1996). IRS-1C applications in land use mapping and planning. Current Science. 70(7), 575-581.Google Scholar
  29. Rao, K.N. and Narendra, K. (2006). Mapping and evaluation of urban sprawling in the Mehadrigedda watershed in Visakhapatnam metropolitan region using remote sensing and GIS. Current Science, 91(11), 1552 -1557.Google Scholar
  30. Rogana, John and Chen, D.M. (2004). Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change. Progress in Planning, 61, 301-325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saha, A.K., Arora, M.K., Csaplovics, E. and Gupta, P.K. (2005). Land cover classification using IRS LISS III image and DEM in a rugged terrain: A case study in Himalayas. Geocarto International, 20(2), 33-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shetty, Amba, Lakshman, N., Sangeeta, T. and Rajesh, M.V.S. (2005). Land use-land cover mapping using satellite data for a forested watershed, Udipi district, Karnataka state, India. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 33, 233-238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singh, Praful, Kumar Suyash and Singh, U.C. (2011). Groundwater resource evaluation in the Gwalior area, India, using satellite data: an integrated geomorphological and geophysical approach. Hydrogeology Journal, (D0I:10.1007/s10040.011-0758-6).Google Scholar
  34. Singh, P.K. (2009). Remote sensing and GIS based hydrogeological study of Morar Watershed, District Gwalior (M.P) India. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Science, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, M.P., India.Google Scholar
  35. Singh, A. (1989). Digital change detection technique using remote sensing data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, 1-6.Google Scholar
  36. Singh, P.K. and Singh, U.C. (2009). Water resource evaluation and management for Morar River basin, Gwalior District, Madhya Pradesh, using GIS. E-journal of Earth Science India, 2(3), 174-186.Google Scholar
  37. Singh, S.K., Thakur, J.K. and Singh, U.K. (2010). Environmental monitoring of land cover/land use changes in Siwalik Hills, Rupnagar district of Punjab, India using remote sensing and ancillary data. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
  38. Srivastava, P., Mukherjee, S. and Gupta, M. (2010). Impact of Urbanization on Land Use/Land Cover Change using Remote Sensing and GIS: A Case Study. Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 18, 106-117.Google Scholar
  39. Tapiador, F. and Casanova, J.L. (2003). Land use mapping methodology using remote sensing for the regional planning directives in Segovia, Spain.Google Scholar
  40. Tejaswini, N.B. (2005). Land use/Land cover mapping in the coastal area of North Karnataka using remote sensing data. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 33(2), 253-257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thakur, J.K. (2010). Eco-hydrological wetland monitoring in a semi-arid region (A case study of Konya Closed Basin, Turkey). Faculty of International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Universiteit Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  42. Thakur, J.K. and Singh, S.K. (2010). Eco-hydrological monitoring of wetlands in a semi-arid region using remote sensing, GIS, GPS and various data sets: A case study of Konya closed basin, Turkey. Paper presented at the IAH 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Capital Publishing Company 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prafull Singh
    • 1
  • Jay Krishna Thakur
    • 2
  • Suyash Kumar
    • 3
  • U. C. Singh
    • 4
  1. 1.Dept. of Civil EngineeringSAMCETBhopalIndia
  2. 2.Dept. Hydrogeology and Environmental GeologyInstitute of Geosciences, Martin Luther UniversityHalleGermany
  3. 3.Department of GeologyGovt. PG Science CollegeGwaliorIndia
  4. 4.School of Studies in Earth Science, Jiwaji UniversityGwaliorIndia

Personalised recommendations