Theory suggests the likelihood of spatial heterogeneity in deconcentration and restructuring within regions. Measuring deconcentration for six subregions within a 65-county area surrounding Chicago, this research estimates the varying magnitude and spatial extent of deconcentration. The results allow three primary conclusions: the magnitude of deconcentration does vary across a region; while the spatial extent of deconcentration includes an outer ring of counties (metropolitan and nonmetropolitan) framing the dominant city (Chicago), it excludes more distant counties which have access to both the dominant and smaller cities, and; the set of budgetary constraints facing commuters acts consistently across the study region. Overall, the results indicate that the strict use of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan classifications obscures our understanding of mechanisms of population growth at the urban-rural fringe. The variation in the magnitude of deconcentration cross-cuts and dissects metropolitan boundaries and contains more variation than can be easily represented by two or three groups of counties. The chapter concludes with a discussion of policy implications for counties experiencing deconcentration and those which are neither isolated nor suburbanizing.
- Ordinary Little Square
- Spatial Heterogeneity
- Geographically Weighted Regression
- Ordinary Little Square Model
- Urban Hierarchy
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Certainly, other criticisms of GWR exist, most notably that it is appropriate only in cases where explanatory variables are linearly related to the dependent variable at specific locations (McMillen, 2004b). Additionally, the fixed weighting scheme used here to select the bandwidth is insensitive to variation in the density of data; the selection of a bandwidth must balance bias versus variance (Zimmerman, 2003).
Ali, K., Olfert, M. R., & Partridge, M. D. (2010). Urban footprints in rural Canada: Employment spillovers by city size. Regional studies. doi: 10.1080/00343400903241477.
Amirahmadi, H., & Wallace, C. (1995). Information technology, the organization of production, and regional development. Environment and Planning A, 27, 1745–1775.
Audirac, I., & Fitzgerald, J. (2003). Information technology (IT) and urban form: An annotated bibliography of the urban deconcentration and economic restructuring literatures. Journal of Planning Literature, 17(4), 480–511.
Berry, B. J. L. (1970). Labor market participation and regional potential. Growth & Change, 1(4), 3–10.
Beyers, W. B. (2000). Cyberspace or human space: Wither cities in the age of telecommunications? In J. O. Wheeler, Y. Aoyama, & B. Warf (Eds.), Cities in the telecommunications age (pp. 161–180). New York: Routledge.
Blank, R. M. (2005). Poverty, policy, and place: How poverty and policies to alleviate poverty are shaped by local characteristics. International Regional Science Review, 28(4), 441–464.
Bolton, R. (1992). ‘Place prosperity vs people prosperity’ revisited: An old issue with a new angle. Urban Studies, 29(2), 185–203.
Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2000). REIS Table CA34, “Average wage per job.” Washington, DC.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2000). Quarterly census of employment and wages. Washington, DC.
Clark, W. A. V., & Kuijpers-Linde, M. (1994). Commuting in restructuring urban regions. Urban Studies, 31(3), 465–483.
Coffey, W. J., & Bailly, A. S. (1992). Producer services and systems of flexible production. Urban Studies, 29(6), 857–868.
Cook, C. C., Crull, S. R., Bruin, M. J., Yust, B. L., Shelley, M. C., Laux, S., et al. (2009). Evidence of a housing decision chain in rural community vitality. Rural Sociology, 74, 113–137.
Cushing, B., & Poot, J. (2004). Crossing boundaries and borders: Regional science advances in migration modeling. Papers in Regional Science, 83, 317–338.
Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2000). Fair market rents. Retrieved August 1, 2009, from http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/fmr.html.
Duncan, C. M. (1999). Worlds apart: Why poverty persists in rural America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Evers, G. (1989). Simultaneous models for migration and commuting: Macro and micro economic approaches. In J. van Dijk, H. Folmer, H. W. Herzog, Jr., A. M. Schlottmann (Eds.), Migration and labour market adjustment (pp. 177–197). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Fishman, R. (1990). America’s new city: Megalopolis unbound. Wilson Quarterly, 14(1), 25–45.
Fotheringham, A. S., Charlton, M. E., & Brunsdon, C. (1998). Geographically weighted regression: A natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environment & Planning A, 30(11), 1905–1927.
Frey, W. H. (1993). The new urban revival in the United States. Urban Studies, 30(4–5), 741–774.
Fuguitt, G. V., & Beagle, C. L. (1996). Recent trends in nonmetropolitan migration: Toward a new turnaround? Growth & Change, 27(2), 156–174.
Gaile, G. L. (1980). The spread-backwash concept. Regional Studies, 14(1), 15–25.
Garcia-Milà, T., & McGuire, T. J. (1992). The contribution of publicly provided inputs to states’ economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22(2), 229–241.
Green, J. J. (2008). Community development as social movement: A contribution to models of practice. Community Development, 39(1), 50–62.
Henry, M. S., Barkley, D. L., & Bao, S. (1997). The hinterland’s stake in metropolitan growth: Evidence from selected southern regions. Journal of Regional Science, 37(3), 479–501.
Henton, D., & Walesh, K. (1998). Linking the new economy to the livable community. A report to the James Irvine Foundation. San Francisco: The James Irvine Foundation.
Hirschorn, J. S. (2000). Growing pains: Quality of life in the new economy. Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association. Retrieved December 13, 2009, from http://www.nga.org/cda/files/GROWINGPAINS.pdf
Internal Revenue Service. (1999). County-to-county migration data. Washington, DC.
Khan, R., Orazem, P. F., & Otto, D. M. (2001). Deriving empirical definitions of spatial labor markets: The roles of competing versus complementary growth. Journal of Regional Science, 41(4), 735–756.
Low, S. A., Henderson, J., & Weiler, S. (2005). Gauging a region’s entrepreneurial potential. Economic Review, Third Quarter, 61–89.
McMillen, D. P. (2004a). Employment subcenters and home price appreciation rates in metropolitan Chicago. In J. P. Lesage & R. K. Pace (Eds.), Spatial and spatiotemporal econometrics (Advances in Econometrics, vol.18, pp. 237–257). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
McMillen, D. P. (2004b). Review: Geographically weighted regression. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(2), 554–556.
Moss, J., Jack, C., & Wallace, M. (2004). Employment location and associated commuting patterns for individuals in disadvantaged rural areas in Northern Ireland. Regional Studies, 38(2), 121–136.
Nelson, A. C., & Dawkins, C. J. (2004). Urban containment in the United States: History, models, and techniques for regional and metropolitan growth management. American Planning Association: Planning Advisory Service Report Number 520.
Oden, M., & Strover, S. (2002). Links to the future: The role of information and telecommunications technology in Appalachian economic development. Washington, DC: Appalachian Regional Commission.
Office of Management and Budget. (1999). Metropolitan areas and components. Washington, DC.
Partridge, M. D., Bollman, R. D., Olfert, M. R., & Alasia, A. (2007). Riding the wave of urban growth in the countryside: Spread, backwash, or stagnation? Land Economics, 83(2), 128–152.
Partridge, M. D., Olfert, M. R., & Ali, K. (2009). Towards a rural development policy: Lessons from the United States and Canada. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 39(2), 109–125.
Partridge, M. D., & Rickman, D. S. (2006). The geography of American poverty. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
Pezzini, M. (2001). Rural policy lessons from OECD countries. International Regional Science Review, 24, 134–145.
Pisarski, A. E. (2006). Commuting in America III. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, NCHRP Report 550/TCRP Report 110.
Plane, D. A., Henrie, C. J., & Perry, M. J. (2005). Migration up and down the urban hierarchy and across the life course. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102(43), 15313–15318.
Portnov, B. A., & Schwartz, M. (2009). Urban clusters as growth foci. Journal of Regional Science, 49(2), 287–310.
Renkow, M. (2003). Employment growth, worker mobility, and rural economic development. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(2), 503–513.
Renkow, M., & Hoover, D. (2000). Commuting, migration, and rural-urban population dynamics. Journal of Regional Science, 40(2), 261–287.
Rephann, T., & Isserman, A. (1994). New highways as economic development tools: An evaluation using quasi-experimental matching methods. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24, 723–751.
Rouwendal, J., & Meijer, E. (2001). Preferences for housing, jobs, and commuting: A mixed logit analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 41(3), 475–505.
Sassen, S. (1994). Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Sassen, S. (2002). Cities in a world economy. In S. Fainstein & S. Campbell (Eds.), Readings in urban theory (2nd ed., pp. 32–56). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Schneider, A., & Woodcock, C. E. (2007). Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Studies, 45(3), 659–692.
Schultz, J. M. (2004). Boomtown USA: The 7-1/2 keys to big success in small towns. Herndon, VA: National Association of Industrial and Office Properties.
Scott, A. (1988). Metropolis: From the division of labor to urban form. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Scott, A. J. & Storper, M. (2003.) Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37(6/7), 579–593.
Storper, M. (1997). The regional world. New York: Guilford.
Strover, S., Oden, M., & Inagaki, N. (2002). Telecommunications and rural economies: Findings from the Appalachian region. In L. F. Craner & S. Greenstein (Eds.), Communications policy and information technology: Promises, problems, prospects (pp. 317–346). Cambridge: MIT Press.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000a). Census 2000: SF3 tables P84 and P86. Washington, DC.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000b). Census transportation and planning package. Washington, DC.
von Thunen, J. H. (1966). Von Thunen’s isolated state (C. M. Wartenberg, Trans.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.
Yu, C. (2009). Net migration drains $1.6 billion from Illinois economy each year. Urbana, IL: Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
Zimmerman, D. (2003). Review: Geographically weighted regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98(463), 765–766.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ganning, J.P., McCall, B.D. (2012). The Spatial Heterogeneity and Geographic Extent of Population Deconcentration: Measurement and Policy Implications. In: Kulcsár, L., Curtis, K. (eds) International Handbook of Rural Demography. International Handbooks of Population, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1841-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1842-5