Skip to main content

Recommendations for a Municipal Health & Safety Policy for Nanomaterials

A Report to the Cambridge City Manager

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nanotechnology, the Brain, and the Future

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society ((YNTS,volume 3))

  • 1904 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Consumer products inventory, Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson Institute. Available at: www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer.

  2. 2.

    “New Nanotech Products Hitting the Market at the Rate of 3-4 Per Week,” Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson Institute, April 24, 2008. Available at: http://www.nanotechproject.org.

References

  • Carole Bass (2008). “As Nanotech’s Promise Grows, Will Puny Particles Present Big Health Problems?” Scientific American (February, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Nanotechnology in Society (2007). Proceedings of the 2007 Nanotechnology Occupational Health and Safety Conference. University of California at Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhitu Chatterjee (2007). The challenge of regulating nanomaterials. Environmental Science & Technology Online. November, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumer Reports (2007). Nanotechnology: Untold Promise, Unknown Risk. Consumer Reports. July, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonio Franco, Stephen Foss Hansen, Stig Irving Olsen, and Luciano Butti (2007). “Limits and prospects of the “incremental approach” and the European legislation on the management of risks related to nanomaterials.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 48(2007): 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ron Hardman (2006). “A Toxicologic Review of Quantum Dots: Toxicity Depends on Physicochemical and Environmental Factors.” Environmental Health Perspectives 114(2): 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suellen Keiner (2008). ROOM AT THE BOTTOM? Potential State and Local Strategies for Managing the Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. Washington, DC, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars - Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • John E. Lindberg & Margaret M. Quinn (2007). A Survey of Environmental, Health and Safety Risk Management Information Needs and Practices among Nanotechnology Firms in the Massachusetts Region. Washington, DC, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars - Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andre Nel, T. X., Lutz Mädler, Ning Li (2006). “REVIEW: Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel” Science 311: 622–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH, Nanotechnology Research Center (2007). Progress Towards Safe Nanotechnology in the Workplace. Washington, DC, US Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günter Oberdörster, Eva Oberdörster, Jan Oberdörster (2005). “Nanotechnology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles.” Environmental Health Perspectives 113(7): 823–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul A Schulte and Fabio Salamanca-Buentello (2007). “Ethical and Scientific Issues of Nanotechnology in the Workplace.” Environmental Health Perspectives 115(1): 5-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan T Stern and McNeil, Scott E (2008). “REVIEW: Nanotechnology Safety Concerns Revisited.” Toxicological Sciences 101(1): 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolf Tolle, Paul Nunn, Trevor Maynard, and David Baxter (2007). Lloyd’s of London Report on Nanotechnology: Recent Development, Risks and Opportunities. London, England, United Kingdom, Lloyd’s of London Emerging Risk Team.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Department for Environment, F. R. A. D. (2007). The UK Voluntary Reporting Scheme for Engineered Nanoscale Materials: Third Quarterly Report. Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, Advisory Committee for Hazardous Substances (ACHS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Li, T. H., Rebecca Salmen, Rebecca Chapman, Stephen S. Leonard, Shih-Houng Young, Anna Shvedova, Michael I. Luster, and Petia P. Simeonova (2007). “Cardiovascular Effects of Pulmonary Exposure to Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes.” Environmental Health Perspectives 115(3): 377–382.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hays, S.A., Robert, J.S., Miller, C.A., Bennett, I. (2013). Recommendations for a Municipal Health & Safety Policy for Nanomaterials. In: Hays, S., Robert, J., Miller, C., Bennett, I. (eds) Nanotechnology, the Brain, and the Future. Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1787-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1787-9_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1786-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1787-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics