Climate pp 123-131 | Cite as

What Social Science Can Teach Us About Local Adaptation

Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

Adaptation to climate change is the focus of great attention in public policy decision making, international economic development, and international negotiation. This chapter offers thoughts on lessons learned from social sciences and examines vocabulary and the intrinsic nature of human coping and adaptive behavior taken from different disciplines. A suggestive review of 15 years of scholarly progress offers insight into key lessons and identifies knowledge gaps. A meta-analysis of existing study results is recommended to enrich existing knowledge about the social dimensions of adaptation, especially at the local scale and for the poorest citizens, and to help create the lens through which current empirical studies of local adaptation can be interpreted and utilized. The insights from a meta-analysis can be utilized directly in studies of adaptation costs, enabling decision makers to more ably plan the future direction of adaptation expenditures.

Keywords

Climate Adaptation Global Environment Facility Earth System Governance Poor Citizen Human Coping 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawala S, Fankhauser S (2008) Economic aspects of adaptation to climate change: costs, benefits and policy instruments. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biermann F, Betsill MM, Gupta J, Kanie N, Lebel L, Liverman D, Schroeder H, Siebenhüner B, with contributions from Conca K, da Ferreira LC, Desai B, Tay S, Zondervan R (2009) Earth system governance: people, places and the planet. Science and implementation plan of the earth system governance project. Earth System Governance Report 1, IHDP Report 20. IHDP, BonnGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowen A, Chatterjee B, Fankhauser S (2009) Adaptation and economic growth. Paper prepared for the UK Department of International Development, Grantham Research Institute, London School of Economics, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cascio J (2009)The next big thing: resilience. Foreign policy. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/. May–June 2009
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Economics of Climate Adaptation Working Group (2009) Shaping climate-resilient development: a framework for decision-making. Global Environmental Facility, Washington, DC, 77 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    EEA (2010) Technical Report Number 10. Mapping the impacts of natural hazards and technological accidents in Europe: an overview of the last decade. Publications Office of the EU, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    IPCC (2007) IPCC Summary for policymakers. In: ML Parry, OF Canziani, JP Palutikof, PJ van der Linden CE Hanson (eds), Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–22Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kane S, Shogren J (2000) Linking adaptation and mitigation in climate change policy (an endogenous risk framework). In: Sally K, Gary Y (eds) Societal adaptation to climate ­variability and change. Kluwer, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kasperson JX, Kasperson R (eds) (2001) Global environmental risk. Earthscan, SterlingGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kasperson JX, Kasperson R (eds) (2005) The social contours of risk, vol 1, Publics, risk ­communication, and the social amplification of risk. Earthscan, SterlingGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kates RW (2000) Cautionary tales: adaptation and the global poor. In: Sally Kane, Gary Y (eds) Societal adaptation to climate variability and change. Kluwer, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klein RJT, Tol RSJ (1997) Adaptation to climate change: options and technologies—an ­overview paper. Technical Paper FCCC/TP/1997/3, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn, p 33Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leary N et al (2007) A stitch in time: adapting to a changing climate. A summary of lessons from AIACC. Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change (AIACC) Working Paper No. 48. AIACC, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lofstedt R (2005) Risk management in post-trust societies. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morris DF (2010) Hindsight and foresight: looking back on Cancun and forward to Durban. In: Weathervane. A Climate Policy Blob from Resources from the Future. Posted 15 Dec 2010 http://www.rff.org/wv/archive/2010/12/15/hindsight-and-foresight-looking-back-on-cancun-and-forward-to-durban.aspx
  17. 17.
    Nagel J, Dietz T, Broadbent J (2009) Sociological perspectives on global climate change. In: Workshop report from workshop held May 2008. NSF, Arlington. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/ses/soc/sqrmii.jsp. Accessed 15 Feb 2011
  18. 18.
    Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP et al (2007) Technical summary. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds),Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 23–78Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parry M, Arnell N, Berry P, Dodman D, Fankhauser S, Hope C, Kovats S, Nicholls R, Satterthwaite D, Tiffin R, Wheeler T (2009) Assessing the costs of adaptation to climate change: a review of the UNFCCC and other recent estimates. International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rayner S, Malone E (1998) Why study human choice and climate change? In: Human choice and climate change, vol 4, What we have learned. Battelle, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reid H, Huq S, Murray L (2010) Community champions: adapting to climate challenge. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reilly J, Schemmelpfennig D (2000) Uncertainty and learning: portraits of adaptation to long-term climate change. In: Sally K, Gary Y (eds) Societal adaptation to climate variability and change. Kluwer, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shogren JF, Crocker TD (1992) Endogenous risk and environmental policy. Working Paper No. 92. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stern P (2005) Understanding individuals’ environmentally significant behavior. Environmental law reporter. ELR news and analysis 35(11):10785–10790. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/dbasse/Environmental%20Law%20Review%20PDF.pdf
  25. 25.
    Swiss Re (2010) Weathering climate change: insurance solutions for more resilient communities, Zurich. http://www.swissre.com/rethinking/climate/Weathering_climate_change.html. Accessed 15 Mar 2011
  26. 26.
    UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int//adaptation/items/4159.php. Accessed 15 Mar 2011
  27. 27.
    Vajjhala S (2009) Global adaptation atlas: linking science, policy, and practice to build resilience to climate change. Resources for the future. http://www.rff.org/News/ClimateAdaptation/Documents/Adaptation%20Atlas%20-%20Illustrated%20Summary.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2011
  28. 28.
    Watson R (Aug 9, 2004) Fast Company. An evolutionary approach to innovationGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    World Bank (2010) Natural hazards, unnatural disasters: the economics of effective prevention. In: Conjunction with the United Nations. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations