Advertisement

Climate pp 237-255 | Cite as

Adapting to Climate Change—A Wicked Problem

A Road Map for Action
  • H. Karl
  • C. Curtin
  • L. Scarlett
  • W. Hopkins
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

Adapting to climate change presents a wicked problem. The properties of wicked problems are described, followed by a discussion of how learning processes developed to address wicked problems are suited to tackling climate change issues. The authors propose to meet the need for integrated research across disciplines by establishing a Virtual Institute to develop a core curriculum on complexity and wicked problems. The chapter concludes with a roadmap for action to adapt to climate change.

Keywords

Climate Change Adaptation Wicked Problem Governance Regime Adaptive Governance Collaborative Governance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Adler PS, Birkhoff JE (2002) Building trust: when knowledge from “Here” meets knowledge from “Away”. The National Policy Consensus Center, Portland. http://www.resolv.org/about_pub_bt.html
  2. 2.
    Ames T (2004) Atlantic cod stock structure in the Gulf of Maine. N Am J Fish Manage 29:10–27Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Argyris C, Schon D (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N (2007) Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. UBC Press, Vancouver, 344 pGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown V (2010) Collective inquiry and its wicked problems. In: Brown VA, Harris JA, Russell JY (eds) Tackling wicked problems through the interdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan, Washington, DC/London, pp 61–83Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown VA, Harris JA, Russell JY (2010) Tackling wicked problems through the interdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan, Washington, DC/London, 312 pGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brunner RD, Lynch AH (2010) Adaptive governance and climate change. American Meteorological Society, Boston, 404 pGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brunner RD, Steelman TA, Coe-Juell L, Cromley CM, Edwards CM, Tucker DW (2005) Adaptive governance, integrating science, policy, and decision making. Columbia University Press, New York, 319 pGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campbell DT (1969) Reforms as experiments. Am Psychol 24:409–429Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Research Council (2008) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 305 pGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    National Research Council (2009) Informing decisions in a changing climate. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 188 pGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Curtin CG (2012) The science of open spaces: Toward durable approaches to environmental change. Island Press, 200 pp (in press)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daniels SE, Walker GB (2001) Working through environmental conflict—the collaborative learning approach. Praeger, Westport, 299 pGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ehrmann JR, Stinson BL (1999) Joint fact-finding and the use of technical experts. In: Susskind L, McKearman S, Thomas-Larmer J (eds) The consensus building handbook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 375–399Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fischer F (2000) Citizens, experts, and the environment. Duke University Press, Durham, p 336Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Folke C, Pritchard L Jr, Berkes F, Colding J, Svedin U (1998) The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: International human dimensions programme on global environmental change, working paper no. 2. http://www.ihdp.uni-bonn.de/html/publications/workingpaper/workpaper01.html
  17. 17.
    Gunderson L, Holling CS, Light SL (1995) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holling CS (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems, local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE (eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 292–317Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holling CS, Chambers AD (1973) Resource science: the nurture of an infant. Bioscience 23:13–20 (This is important paper to understand the context of this seminar)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Institute of Medicine and National Research Council (2002) Integrity in scientific research: creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 202 pGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karl HA, Susskind LE, Wallace KH (2007) A dialogue, not a diatribe—effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding. Environment 49(1):20–34Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kellert SR (1996) The value of life, biological diversity and human society. Island Press, Washington, DC/Covelo, 263 pGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kellert SR (2005) Building for life, designing and understanding the human-nature connection. Island Press, Washington, DC/Covelo, 250 pGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koontz TM, Steelman TA, Carmin J, Korfmacher KS, Moseley C, Thomas CW (2004) Collaborative environmental management: what roles for government? Resources for the future, Washington, DC, 210 pGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lane N (2006) Alarm bells should help us refocus. Science 312:1847Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lubchenco J (1998) Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279(5350):491–497Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meadows D (1999) Leverage points: places to intervene in a system. Sustainability Institute, Dec 1999Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meine C (1988) Aldo Leopold, his life and work. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 638 pGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    National Research Council (1995) Science, policy, and the coast: improving decisionmaking. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reali PD (2010) H2 (how to) solve wicked problems, getting started with creative problem solving. OmniSkills Press, Charlotte, 60 pGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rittel H, Weber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Romme AG, van Witteloostuin A (1999) Circular organizing and triple loop learning. J Organ Change Manage 12:439–454Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scheffer M, Westley FR (2007) The evolutionary basis of rigidity: locks in cells, minds, and society. Ecol Soc 12(2):13Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schon DA (1971) Beyond the stable state. W.W. Norton, New York, 254 pGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline—the art and practice of a learning organization. Currancy Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Susskind L, McKearman S, Thomas-Larmer J (eds) (1999) The consensus building handbook. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Westley F, Zimmerman B, Patton MQ (2006) Getting to maybe: how the world is changed. Random House, Toronto, 256 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work, lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington, DC/Covelo, 277 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Antioch University of New EnglandKeeneUSA
  3. 3.Resources for the FutureWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.Cobscook Bay Resource CenterEastportUSA

Personalised recommendations