Advertisement

Climate pp 193-207 | Cite as

Sustainable Development and Climate Change Challenges

Case of a Public Organization
  • M. Merad
  • N. Dechy
  • F. Marcel
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

In 2007, the French government organized a set of meetings around environment and sustainable development problematics called, “Environment Grenelle”. The conclusions of these meetings were introduced in a new law published in August 2009 (“Grenelle 1,” n 2009-967). In Article 1 of this law, the State is obliged to frame a Sustainable Development National Strategy (SDNS) structured around nine challenges. The first challenge consists in fighting against climate change. The SDNS is used as a plinth for the involvement of public and private organizations in this perspective. Many practical questions are raised when struggling against climate change and implementing the sustainable development principle (SD Principle) within the organizational framework: How to develop adaptive methods and tools helping organizations reach a new balance facing environmental, economic, and social risks induced by those broad challenges? Are there any standards of reference and if not can we develop an innovative approach to support decision making within uncertainty? How to develop a dashboard to a proportioned allocation of resources adapted to the various stakeholders and level of decision within the organization? How to compare actions that can have different impacts in different subsystems and with different time frameworks? After a brief historical overview of the origin of the challenges of sustainable development and climate change, we will raise briefly, in the first part of the paper, some theoretical issues and discuss why struggling against such a global issue as climate change is a complex problem within an organization and how sustainable development principles can support decision making under uncertainty. In the second part, we will address practical issues for an organization facing the challenges of sustainable development and climate change. Indeed, we will relate the experience of framing a sustainable development plan within a public institution using an organizational approach and a multiple-criteria decision aid methodology. Finally, we will discuss the decision makers’ choices and the lessons learned by implementing an innovative approach that we set up to face these new challenges.

Keywords

Climate Change Sustainable Development Participative Approach Public Organization Climate Change Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Boch-Jaccobsen M (2002) Folies à plusieurs: De l’hystérie à la dépression. Les empêcheurs de penser en rond. Le seuil, Paris, 393 pGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bunge M, Halbwachs F, Kuhn ThS, Piaget J, Rosenfeld L (1971) Les théories de la causalité. Bibliothèque scientifique internationale. Etudes d’épistémologie génétique. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 208 pGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dechy N, Dien Y, Llory M (2010) Pour une culture de sécurité au service de la sécurité industrielle. In: Proceedings of the IMdR Lambda-Mu 17 conference, La Rochelle, 5–7 Octobre 2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diamond J (2005) Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dupuis J-P (2002) Pour un catastrophisme éclairé: quand l’impossible est certain. Report for Futuribles Round TableGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Husserl E (1947) Méditations cartésiennes. Introduction à la phénoménologie. Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, Paris, 256 pGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katz D, Kahn RL (1978) The social psychology of organizations, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, 838 pGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merad M (2003) Apport des méthodes d’aide multicritère à la décision pour l’analyse et la gestion des risques liés aux mouvements de terrains. Thèse de doctorat. Université Paris-DauphineGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Merad M (2010) Aide à la décision et expertise en gestion des risques. Editions LavoisierGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Merad M, Dechy N, Guionnet D, Marcel F (2010) L’Organisation face aux défis du développement durable. Cas de la place une démarche DD dans un institut d’expertise public dans le domaine de l’environnement industriel et des risques. SubmittedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Merad M, Verdel T, Roy B, Kouniali S (2004) Use of multi-criteria decision-aids for risk zoning and management of large area subjected to mining-induced hazards. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 19(2):125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morin E (2007) L’an 1 de l’ère écologique. Editions Tallandier, ParisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INERISVerneuil-en-HalatteFrance

Personalised recommendations