Advertisement

Measuring Quality of Urban Life in Istanbul

  • Handan TürkoğluEmail author
  • Fulin Bölen
  • Perver Korça Baran
  • Fatih Terzi
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 45)

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of a study examining the quality of urban life in the Istanbul metropolitan area. The primary source of information was a household survey conducted as part of the strategic planning process undertaken by the Greater Istanbul Municipality. The specific goal of the study was to inform government officials and planners about residents’ perceptions of urban life in a large and rapidly growing region. The quality of the broader residential environment and the housing unit are among the basic indicators of quality of life. Residential environments not only provide shelter but they also support a healthy family life, the care of children, and individual fulfillment or well-being. Therefore, survey findings were important to the planning process in identifying the nature and location of problems in residential areas. The chapter reviews findings from the household survey. Selected recommendations aimed at enhancing quality of life are then summarized. These cover alternative housing strategies and plans for enhancing neighborhood quality throughout the metro area.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Public Transportation Residential Environment Urban Life Dwelling Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bolen, F., Turkoglu, H. D., Ergun, N., Yirmibeşoğlu, F., Kundak, S., Terzi, F., & Kaya, S. (2006) İstanbul’da Konut Alanlarında Fiziksel Çevre Kalitesi Analizi (Konut ve Yaşam Kalitesi Grubu Raporu, Cilt I). Istanbul: Istanbul Metropolitan Planning and Design Center.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Frank, L. D., Schmid, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Chapman, J., & Saelens, B. E. (2005). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2(Sup. 2), 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Istanbul Metropoliten Municipality. (1996). Istanbul master plan report. İstanbul: Istanbul Metropoliten Municipality.Google Scholar
  5. Marans, R. W. (2003). Modeling residential quality using subjective and objective indicators. In D. U. Vestbro, Y. Hurol, & N. Wilkinson (Eds.), Methodologies in housing research (pp. 312–326). Newcastle Upon Tyne: Urban International Press.Google Scholar
  6. Marans, R. W., & Rodgers, W. (1975). Toward and understanding of community Satisfaction. In A. Hawley & V. Rock (Eds.), Metropolitan America in contemporary perspective (pp. 299–352). New York: Halstead Press.Google Scholar
  7. Statistical Institution of Turkey. (2008). Statistical year book. Ankara: Statistical Institution of Turkey.Google Scholar
  8. Turkoglu, H. D., Bölen F., Baran P. K., & Marans, R.W. (2006). İstanbul’da Yaşam Kalitesinin Ölçülmesi (Konut ve Yaşam Kalitesi Grubu Cilt II). Istanbul: Istanbul Metropolitan Planning and Design Center.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Handan Türkoğlu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fulin Bölen
    • 1
  • Perver Korça Baran
    • 2
  • Fatih Terzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of ArchitectureIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations