Advertisement

Amenities, Quality of Life, and Regional Development

  • Gordon F. Mulligan
  • John I. CarruthersEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 45)

Abstract

There is an extensive literature in regional science focusing on economic and regional development in which the role of urban amenities and disamenities has been used to model quality of urban life. Modeling efforts for the most part have used secondary aggregate data and spatial econometric analysis. The chapter reviews that literature emphasizing the role that urban amenities/disamenities might play in influencing regional development and migration patterns.

Keywords

Housing Price Regional Development Geographically Weighted Regression Natural Amenity Spatial Error Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adamson, D. W., Clark, D. E., & Partridge, M. D. (2004). Do urban agglomeration effects and household amenities have a skill bias? Journal of Regional Science, 44, 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alasia, A., Bollman, R, Parkins, J., & Reimer B. (2008). An index of community vulnerability: Conceptual framework and application to population and employment changes 1981 to 2001 (Agriculture and rural working paper series). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Albouy, D. Y. (2008). Are big cities really bad places to live? Improving quality-of-life estimates across cities (Working paper 14472). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  4. Allinson, J. (2005). Exodus or renaissance? Metropolitan migration in the late 1990s. Town Planning Review, 76, 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Bartik, T. J., & Smith, V. K. (1987). Urban amenities and public policy. In E. S. Mills (Ed.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Urban economics, Vol. 2, pp. 1207–1254). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  7. Beeson, E. (1991). Amenities and regional differences in returns to worker characteristics. Journal of Urban Economics, 30, 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Berger, M. C., Blomquist, G. C., & Waldner, W. (1987). A Revealed-Preference Ranking of Quality-of-life for Metropolitan Areas. Social Science Quarterly, 68, 761–778.Google Scholar
  10. Berry, B. J. L., & Horton, F. E. (1970). Geographic perspectives on urban systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Blomquist, G. C., Berger, M. C., & Hoehn, J. P. (1988). New estimates of quality of life in urban areas. The American Economic Review, 78, 89–107.Google Scholar
  12. Bockstael, N. E., & Freeman III, A. M. (2005). Welfare theory and valuation. Handbook of Environmental Economics. Vol. 2, Valuing Environmental Changes, pp. 517–570. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. Borts, G. H., & Stein, J. L. (1964). Economic Growth in a Free Market. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Brueckner, J. K., Thisse, J. F., & Zenou, Y. (1999). Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. European Economic Review, 43, 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruinsma, F., & Rietveld, P. (1993). European agglomerations in European infrastructure networks. Urban Studies, 30, 919–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canaleta, C. G., Arzoz, P. P., & Gárate, M. R. (2004). Regional economic disparities and decentralization. Urban Studies, 41, 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carlino, G. A., & Mills, E. S. (1987). The determinants of county growth. Journal of Regional Science, 27, 39–54.Google Scholar
  18. Carruthers, J. I., & Mulligan, G. F. (2006). Environmental valuation: Connecting theory, evidence, and public policy. In J. I. Carruthers & B. Mundy (Eds.), Environmental valuation (pp. 3–25). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Carruthers, J. I., & Mulligan, G. F. (2008). A locational analysis of growth and change in American Metropolitan Areas. Papers in Regional Science, 87, 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carruthers, J. I, & Mulligan, G. F. (2009). The “plane of living” and the recent evolution of housing values in the United States (U.S. Department of housing and urban development working paper, # REP 09–01).Google Scholar
  21. Cheshire, P. C., & Magrini, S. (2006). Population growth in European cities: Weather matters but only nationally. Regional Studies, 40, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cheshire, P. C., & Magrini, S. (2008). Urban growth drivers and spatial inequalities: Europe – a case with geographically sticky people. Venice: Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.Google Scholar
  23. Clark, D. E., & Hunter, W. (1992). The impact of economic opportunity, amenities, and fiscal factors on age-specific migration rates. Journal of Regional Science, 32, 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Clark, D. E., & Murphy, C. A. (1996). Countywide employment and population growth: An Analysis of the 1980s. Journal of Regional Science, 36, 235–256.Google Scholar
  25. Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2000). Power couples: Changes in the locational choice of the college educated, 1940–1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1287–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cushing, B. (1993). The effect of the social welfare system on metropolitan migration in the United States, by income group, gender, and family structure. Urban Studies, 30, 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davies, S. W., Clark, W. V. A., & Ruiz, T. (2008). Demographic variation in housing cost adjustments with United States family migration. Population, Space and Place, 14, 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Deller, S. C., Tsai, T. H., Marcouiller, D. W., & English, D. B. K. (2001). The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(2), 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Des Rosiers, F., Thériaul, M., Florent, J., & Villeneuve, P. (2005). The heterogeneous nature of accessibility to urban amenities and its impact on property values. Paper presented at the Annual North American Meeting of the Regional Science Association International, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
  30. Diamond, D. B., & Tolley, G. S. (Eds.). (1982). The economics of urban amenities. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  31. Dicken, P., & Lloyd, P. E. (1981). Modern western society. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  32. Dissart, J. C., & Deller, S. C. (2000). Quality of life in the planning literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 1, 36–61.Google Scholar
  33. Dorfman, J. H., Partridge, M. D., & Galloway, H. (2008). Are high-tech employment and natural amenities linked? Answers from a smoothed Bayesian spatial model. Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Association, Orlando.Google Scholar
  34. Elliott, J. R., & Perry, M. J. (1996). Metropolitanizing nonmetro space: Population redistribution and emergent metropolitan areas, 1965–1990. Rural Sociology, 61, 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ferguson, M., Ali, K., Olfert, M. R., & Partridge, M. D. (2007). Voting with their feet: Jobs versus amenities. Growth and Change, 38, 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Freeman, A. M. (2003). The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  39. Frenette, J. F. (2008). The index of community vulnerability (ICV) revisited: Exploring the determinants of rural working age population out-migration in Canada, 2001–2006. Paper presented at the Annual North American Meeting of the Regional Science Association International, Brooklyn.Google Scholar
  40. Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state. New York: Signet Books.Google Scholar
  42. Glaeser, E. L. (2007). The economics approach to cities. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper # 13696.Google Scholar
  43. Glaeser, E. L., & Kohlhase, J. E. (2004). Cities, regions, and the decline of transport costs. Papers in Regional Science, 83, 197–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Glaeser, E. L., & Maré, D. C. (2001). Cities and skills. Journal of Labor Economics, 19, 316–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Glaeser, E. L., Kolko, J., & Saiz, A. (2001). Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography, 1, 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Goodrich, C., Allin, B. W., Thornthwaite, C. W., Brunck, H. K., Tyron, F. G., Creamer, D. B., Vance, R., & Hayes, M. (1936). Migration and economic opportunity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  47. Gottlieb, P. D., & Joseph, G. (2006). College-to-work migration of technology graduates and holders of doctorates within the United States. Journal of Regional Science, 46, 627–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Greenwood, M. J., & Hunt, G. L. (1989). Jobs versus amenities in the analysis of metropolitan migration. Journal of Urban Economics, 25, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Greenwood, M. J., & Hunt, G. L. (2003). The early history of migration research. International Regional Science Review, 26, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gyourko, J., & Tracy, J. (1989). The importance of local fiscal conditions in analyzing local labor markets, Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1208–1231.Google Scholar
  51. Gyourko, J., & Tracy, J. (1991). The structure of local public finance and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 774–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gyourko, J., Kahn, M. E., & Tracy, J. (1999). Quality of life and environmental conditions. In P. Cheshire & E. S. Mills (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Applied urban economics, Vol. 3, pp. 1413–1454). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  53. Hansen, S. B., Ban, C., & Huggins, L. (2003). Explaining the ‘brain drain’ from older industrial cities. Economic Development Quarterly, 17, 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Harris, R. N. S., Tolley, G. S., & Harrell, C. (1968). The residence site choice. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 50, 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  56. Henderson, J. V. (1974). The sizes and types of cities. The American Economic Review, 70, 894–910.Google Scholar
  57. Herzog, H., & Schlottmann, A. (1986). The metro rating game: What can be learned from recent migrants? Growth and Change, 17, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Herzog, H., Schlottmann, A., & Johnson, D. (1986). High-technology jobs and worker mobility. Journal of Regional Science, 26, 445–459.Google Scholar
  59. Hoehn, J. P., Berger, M. C., & Blomquist, G. C. (1987). A hedonuc model of interregional washes, rents, and amenity values. Journal of Regional Science, 27, 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jensen, T., & Deller, S. C. (2007). Spatial modeling of the migration of older people with a focus on Amenities. The Review of Regional Studies, 37, 303–343.Google Scholar
  61. Kendall, J., & Pigozzi, B. W. (1994). Nonemployment income and the economic base of Michigan Counties: 1959–1986. Growth and Change, 25, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Krupka, D. J. (2007). Location-specific human capital, location choice and amenity demand (Discussion Paper No. 2987). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  63. Krupka, D. J. (2008). On amenities, natural advantage and agglomeration (Discussion Paper No. 3598). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  64. Lambiri, D., Biagi, B., & Royuela, V. (2007). Quality of life in the economic and urban economic literature. Social Indicators Research, 84, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lee, N. (2006). Ideopolis: Knowledge cities – A review of quality of life measures. London: The Work Foundation.Google Scholar
  66. Massam, B. H. (1975). Location and space in social administration. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  67. Massam, B. H. (1993). The right place. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  68. McGranahan, D. A. (1993). Natural amenities drive rural population change (Agricultural Economic Report No. 781). Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington.Google Scholar
  69. Mueser, P. R., & Graves, P. E. (1995). Estimating the role of economic opportunity and amenities in explaining population redistribution. Journal of Urban Economics, 37, 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mulligan, G. F., Vias, A. C., & Glavac, S. M. (1999). Initial diagnostics of a regional adjustment model. Environment and Planning A, 31, 855–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mulligan, G. F., Carruthers, J. I., & Cahill, M. (2004). Urban quality of life and public policy: A review. In R. Capello & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Urban dynamics and growth: Advances in urban economics (pp. 729–802). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  72. Muth, R. F. (1969). Cities and Housing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  73. Nussbaum, M. C., & Sen, A. (Eds.). (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  74. Partridge, M. D., Rickman, D. S., Ali, K., & Olfert, M. R. (2008a). Lost in space: Population growth in the American hinterlands and small cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 727–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Partridge, M. D., Rickman, D. S., Ali, K., & Olfert, M. R. (2008b). The geographic diversity of United States nonmetropolitan growth dynamics: A geographically weighted regression approach. Land Economics, 84, 243–268.Google Scholar
  76. Perloff, H. S., Dunn, E. S., Lampard, E. E., & Muth, R. F. (1960). Regions, resources, and economic growth. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  77. Plane, D. A., & Heins, F. (2003). Age articulation of United States inter-metropolitan migration flows. The Annals of Regional Science, 37, 10–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Plane, D. A., Henrie, C. J., & Perry, M. J. (2005). Spatial demography special feature: Migration up and down the urban hierarchy and across the life course. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 15313–15318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Power, T. M. (1996). Lost landscapes and failed economies. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  80. Power, T. M., & Barrett, R. N. (2001). Post-Cowboy Economics: Pay and Prosperity in the New American West. Washington D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  81. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  82. Rappaport, J. (2004). Why are population flows so persistent? Journal of Urban Economics, 56, 554–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rappaport, J., & Sachs, J. D. (2003). The United States as a coastal nation. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rauch, J. E. (1993). Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: Evidence from the cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 34, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ravenstein, E. G. (1885). The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 48, 167–235.Google Scholar
  86. Roback, J. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1257–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Roback, J. (1988). Wages, rents, and amenities: Differences among workers and regions. Economic Inquiry, 26, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rogerson, R. J., Findlay, A. M., & Morris, A. S. (1988). The best cities to live in. Town and Country Planning, 57, 270–273.Google Scholar
  89. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rosen, S. (1979). Wage-based indexes of urban quality of life. In P. Mieszkowski & M. Straszheim (Eds.), Current issues in economics (pp. 74–104). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  91. Rostow, W. W. (1968). The stages of economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Rothschild, E. (2009). The decline of the auto-industrial society. New York Review of Books, 61(3), 8–9.Google Scholar
  93. Savageau, D. (2007). Places rated almanac (7th ed.). Washington: Places Rated Books.Google Scholar
  94. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  95. Smith, D. M. (1977). Human geography: A welfare approach. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  96. Smith, D. M. (1994). Geography and social justice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  97. Stimson, R. J., Baum, S. W., Mullins, P. F., & O’Connor, K. (2001). A typology of community opportunity and vulnerability in metropolitan Australia. Papers in Regional Science, 80, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Thorndike, E. L. (1939). Your city. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.Google Scholar
  99. Tolley, G. S. (1974). The welfare economics of city bigness. Journal of Urban Economics, 1, 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Ullman, E. L. (1954). Amenities as a factor in regional growth. Geographical Review, 44, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Frijters, P. (1999). The measurement of welfare and well-being: The Leyden approach. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 413–433). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  102. Welch, R. K., Carruthers, J. I., & Waldorf, B. S. (2007). Public service expenditures as compensating differentials in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: Housing values and rents. Cityscape, 9, 131–156.Google Scholar
  103. Whisler, R. L., Waldorf, B. S., Mulligan, G. F., & Plane, D. A. (2008). Quality of life and the migration of the college educated: A life-course approach. Growth and Change, 19, 58–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wong, C. (2002). Developing indicators to inform local economic development. Urban Studies, 39, 1833–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Yousefi, M., & Rives, J. (1987). Migration behavior of college graduates: An empirical analysis. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 16, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geography and DevelopmentUniversity of ArizonaSquamishCanada, USA
  2. 2.Sustainable Urban Planning Program College of Professional StudiesThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations