Advertisement

Subjective Measurement of Quality of Life Using Primary Data Collection and the Analysis of Survey Data

  • Rod McCreaEmail author
  • Robert W. Marans
  • Robert Stimson
  • John Western
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 45)

Abstract

The subjective analysis of quality of life (QOL) was first systematized in the 1960s through the use of large-scale sample survey designs in which extensive data were collected on peoples’ evaluations of QOL domains. Domains typically included financial well-being, health, job, family and friends, leisure and place. Place domains were community, neighborhood and housing. More recently, sophisticated model frameworks have emerged in which QOUL is conceptualized as a composite of housing, neighborhood and community satisfaction together with regional satisfaction and their interrelationships. The chapter reviews the evolution of approaches to measuring, analyzing and modeling subjective QOL and QOUL and their theoretical bases, concluding with a reference to recent agent modeling approaches.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Urban Environment Subjective Evaluation Life Domain Subjective Importance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abele, A. E., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (1999). Satisfaction judgments in positive and negative moods: Effects of concurrent assimilation and contrast producing processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(7), 883–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acock, A. C., & Hurlbert, J. S. (1993). Social networks, marital-status, and well-being. Social Networks, 15(3), 309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amerigo, M., & Aragones, J. I. (1997). A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(1), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andelman, R., Board, R., Carman, L., Cummins, R., Ferriss, A., Friedman, P., et al. (1998). Quality of life definition and terminology: A discussion document from the international society of quality of life studies (Monograph). Blacksburg: International Society of Quality of Life Studies.Google Scholar
  5. Andrews, F., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans perceptions of quality of life. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle. ([circa 350 BC] 1998). Nicmachean ethics. In L. P. Pojman (Ed.), Ethical theory: Classical and contemporary readings (3rd ed., pp. 365–378). Melbourne: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Balchin, P., Kieve, J., & Bull, G. (1995). Urban land economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Barreteau, O. (2003). The joint use of role-playing games and models regarding negotiation processes: Characterization of associations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/3.html
  9. Batty, M., & Longley, P. (1994). Fractal cities. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  10. Batty, M., & Xie, Y. (1997). Possible urban automata. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell, K. P., & Irwin, E. G. (2002). Spatially explicit micro-level modeling of land use change at the rural-urban interface. Agricultural Economics, 27, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bentham, J. ([1789]1998). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In L. P. Pojman (Ed.), Ethical theory: Classical and contemporary readings (3rd ed., pp. 149–151). Melbourne: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  13. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory: A symposium (pp. 287–304). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  15. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, L. A., & Moore, E. G. (1970). The intra-urban migration process: A perspective. Geografiska Annaler, 52, 368–381.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, D. G., Page, S. E., Riolo, R., & Rand, W. (2004). Agent-based and analytical modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of greenbelts. Environmental Modelling and Software, 19, 1097–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bruin, M. J., & Cook, C. C. (1997). Understanding constraints and residential satisfaction among low-income single-parent families. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 532–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rogers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Carley, M. (1981). Social measurement and social indicators: Issues of policy and theory. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  21. Chiang, L. N., & Hsu, J. R. (2005). Locational decisions and residential preferences of Taiwanese immigrants in Australia. GeoJournal, 64(1), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clark, W. A. V., & Huang, Y. Q. (2003). The life course and residential mobility in British housing markets. Environment and Planning A, 35(2), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Clark, W. A. V., & Huang, Y. Q. (2004). Linking migration and mobility: Individual and contextual effects in housing markets in the UK. Regional Studies, 38(6), 617–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Clark, W. A. V., & Ledwith, V. (2006). Mobility, housing stress, and neighborhood contexts: Evidence from Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A, 38(6), 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clark, M. S., & Williamson, G. M. (1989). Mood and social judgments. In H. L. Wagner & A. S. R. Manstead (Eds.), Handbook of social psychophysiology: Emotion and social behavior (pp. 347–370). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M. C., & Dieleman, F. M. (2000). Housing consumption and residential crowding in US housing markets. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Clore, G. L., & Tamir, M. (2002). Affect as embodied information. Psychological Inquiry, 13(1), 37–45.Google Scholar
  28. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  29. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domain of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cummins, R. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52(1), 55–72.Google Scholar
  31. Cummins, R., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.Google Scholar
  32. Cummins, R. A., McCabe, M. P., Romeo, Y., & Gullone, E. (1994). Comprehensive quality of life scale (ComQol): Instrument development and psychometric evaluation on college staff and students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Desbarats, J. (1983). Spatial choice and constraints on behavior. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73(3), 340–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dieleman, F. M., & Mulder, C. H. (2002). The geography of residential choice. In J. I. Aragones, G. Francescato, & T. Garling (Eds.), Residential environments: Choice, satisfaction, and behavior (pp. 35–54). London: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  35. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Evans, S., & Huxley, P. (2002). Studies of quality of life in the general population. International Review of Psychiatry, 14(3), 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Evans, D., Pellizzari, J. R., Culbert, B. J., & Metzen, M. E. (1993). Personality, marital, and occupational factors associated with quality-of-life. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 477–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fernandez, L. E., Brown, D. G., Marans, R. W., & Nassauer, J. I. (2005). Characterizing location preference in an exurban population: Implications for agent-based modeling. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design., 32, 799–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (Aim). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Foroughi, E., Misajon, R., & Cummins, R. A. (2001). The relationships between migration, social support, and social integration on quality of life. Behaviour Change, 18(3), 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fredland, D. R. (1974). Residential mobility and home purchase: A longitudinal perspective on the family life cycle and the housing market. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  45. Galster, G. C., & Hesser, G. W. (1981). Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13(6), 735–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ge, J., & Hokao, K. (2006). Research on residential lifestyles in Japanese cities from the viewpoints of residential preference, residential choice and residential satisfaction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3), 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gill, T. M., & Feinstein, A. R. (1994). A critical appraisal of the quality-of-life measurements. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(8), 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Golledge, R. G., & Stimson, R. J. (1997). Spatial behavior: A geographic perspective. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hart, P. M. (1999). Predicting employee life satisfaction: A coherent model of personality, work and nonwork experiences, and domain satisfactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 564–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hayes, N., & Joseph, S. (2003). Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 723–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Headey, B. W., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Headey, B. W., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
  53. Heller, D., Judge, T. A., & Watson, D. (2002). The confounding role of personality and trait affectivity in the relationship between job and life satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(7), 815–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hsieh, C. M. (2004). To weight or not to weight: The role of domain importance in quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 68(2), 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ibrahim, M. F., & Chung, S. W. (2003). Quality of life of residents living near industrial estates in Singapore. Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. John, L. H. (2004). Subjective well-being in a multicultural urban population: Structural, and multivariate analyses of the Ontario health survey well-being scale. Social Indicators Research, 68(1), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Scharwz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–26). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Kim, T. K., Horner, M. W., & Marans, R. W. (2005). Life cycle and environmental factors in selecting residential and job locations. Housing Studies, 20(3), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lance, C. E., Lautenschlager, G. J., Sloan, C. E., & Varca, P. E. (1989). A comparison between bottom-up, top-down, and bidirectional models of relationships between global and life facet satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 601–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lance, C. E., Mallard, A. G., & Michalos, A. C. (1995). Tests of the causal directions of global life facet satisfaction relationships. Social Indicators Research, 34(1), 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Landis, J. D. (1994). The California urban futures model: A new generation of metropolitan simulation models. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21, 399–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Longino, C. F., Perzynski, A. T., & Stoller, E. P. (2002). Pandora’s briefcase: Unpacking the retirement migration decision. Research on Aging, 24(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lu, M. (1999). Determinants of residential satisfaction: Ordered logit vs. regression models. Growth and Change, 30(2), 264–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Marans, R. W., & Rodgers, W. (1975). Toward an understanding of community satisfaction. In V. Rock & A. Hawley (Eds.), Metropolitan America in contemporary perspective (pp. 299–352). New York: Halsted.Google Scholar
  66. Mastekaasa, A. (1984). Multiplicative and additive-models of job and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 14(2), 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McCrea, R. (2007). Urban quality of life: Linking objective dimensions and subjective evaluations of the urban environment. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  68. McCrea, R., Stimson, R., & Western, J. (2005). Testing a moderated model of satisfaction with urban living using data for Brisbane-South East Queensland, Australia. Social Indicators Research, 72, 121–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McCrea, R., Shyy, T. K., & Stimson, R. (2006). What is the strength of the link between objective and subjective indicators of urban quality of life? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 79–96.Google Scholar
  70. Meadow, H. L., Mentzer, J. T., Rahtz, D. R., & Sirgy, M. J. (1992). Life satisfaction measure based on judgment theory. Social Indicators Research, 26(1), 23–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16(4), 347–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Michalos, A. C. (1986). An application of multiple discrepancies theory (MDT) to seniors. Social Indicators Research, 18(4), 349–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Michalos, A. C., & Zumbo, B. D. (1999). Public services and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 48(2), 125–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Michalos, A. C., Hubley, A. M., Zumbo, B. D., & Hemingway, D. (2001). Health and other aspects of the quality of life of older people. Social Indicators Research, 54(3), 239–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Mill, J. S. ([1863]1998). Utilitarianism. In L. P. Pojman (Ed.), Ethical theory: Classical and contemporary readings (3rd ed., pp. 189–210). Melbourne: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  77. Oliver, N., Holloway, F., & Carson, J. (1995). Deconstructing quality of life. Journal of Mental Health, 4, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pacione, M. (1990). Urban livability: A review. Urban Geography, 11(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pacione, M. (2003). Quality-of-life research in urban geography. Urban Geography, 24(4), 314–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Parker, D. C., Manson, S. M., Janssen, M. A., Hoffman, M. J., & Deadman, P. (2003). Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 314–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2413–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high- and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Phe, H. H., & Wakely, P. (2000). Status, quality and the other trade-off: Towards a new theory of urban residential location. Urban Studies, 37(1), 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Quigley, J., & Weinberg, D. (1977). Intra-urban residential mobility: A review and synthesis. International Regional Science Review, 2, 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Roesch, S. C. (1999). Modelling the direct and indirect effects of positive emotional and cognitive traits and states on social judgements. Cognition and Emotion, 13(4), 387–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rojas, M. N. (2004) Well-being and the complexity of poverty: A subjective well-being approach (WIDER Research Paper). pp. 2004–2029.Google Scholar
  87. Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility. Clencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  88. Russell, L. B., Hubley, A. M., Palepu, A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2006). Does weighting capture what’s important? Revisiting subjective importance weighting with a quality of life measure. Social Indicators Research, 75(1), 141–167.Google Scholar
  89. Salvatore, N., & Muňuz Sastre, M. T. (2001). Appraisal of life: “Area” versus “dimension” conceptualisations. Social Indicators Research, 53, 229–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? The informative function of affective states. In K. Fiedler & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44–62). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  92. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman & E. Diener (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  93. Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Kommer, D., & Wagner, D. (1987). Soccer, rooms, and the quality of your life: Mood effects on judgments of satisfaction with life in general and with specific domains. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17(1), 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sedikides, C. (1995). Central and peripheral self-conceptions are differentially influenced by mood: Tests of the differential sensitivity hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 759–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2001). Further validation of the Sirgy et al.’s measure of community quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 56(2), 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59(1), 79–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sirgy, M. J., Rahtz, D. R., Cicic, M. A., & Underwood, R. (2000). A method for assessing residents’ satisfaction with community-based services: A quality-of-life perspective. Social Indicators Research, 49(3), 279–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Speare, A., Goldstein, S., & Frey, W. H. (1975). Residential mobility, migration, and metropolitan change. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  99. Stimson, R. J., & McCrea, R. (2004). A push-pull framework for modelling the relocation of retirees to a retirement village: The Australian experience. Environment and Planning A, 36, 1451–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Trauer, T., & Mackinnon, A. (2001). The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement. Quality of Life Research, 10, 579–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Turksever, A. N. E., & Atalik, G. (2001). Possibilities and limitations for the measurement of the quality of life in urban areas. Social Indicators Research, 53(2), 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life: Ordering concepts and measures of the good quality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Vitterso, J. (2001). Personality traits and subjective well-being: emotional stability, not extraversion, is probably the important predictor. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 903–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Vitterso, J., & Nilsen, F. (2002). The conceptual and relational structure of subjective well-being, neuroticism, and extraversion: Once again, neuroticism is the important predictor of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 57(1), 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Walmsley, D. J., Epps, W. R., & Duncan, C. J. (1998). Migration to the New South Wales North coast 1986–1991: Lifestyle motivated counterurbanisation. Geoforum, 29(1), 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wright, S. J. (1985). Health satisfaction: A detailed test of the multiple discrepancies theory model. Social Indicators Research, 17(3), 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006a). Do we need to weight item satisfaction by item importance? A perspective from Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 9(3), 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006b). Do we need to weight satisfaction scores with importance ratings in measuring quality of life? Social Indicators Research, 78(2), 305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rod McCrea
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert W. Marans
    • 2
  • Robert Stimson
    • 3
  • John Western
  1. 1.Institute for Social Science ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Australian Urban Research Infrastructure Network (AURIN), Faculty of Architecture, Building and PlanningUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations