Advertisement

Objective Measurement of Quality of Life Using Secondary Data Analysis

  • Robert StimsonEmail author
  • Robert W. Marans
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 45)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on approaches to analyzing objective quality of life (QOL) using aggregated spatial data, particularly in an urban context. It reviews the evolution of studies from the 1960s and 1970s when a vast literature was produced on social and territorial social indicators. The literature ranges from measuring dimensions of well-being to recent approaches in which spatial econometric modeling is used to study objective indicators of QOUL. The latter studies often emphasize the measurement of urban amenity. The chapter also summarizes numerous initiatives to rank cities according to their QOL and livability.

Keywords

Census Tract Social Indicator Objective Indicator Territorial Unit Location Quotient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agoe, C. (1970). Social indicators: selected readings. Annals of the Association of American Academy of Political Science, 388, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer, R. A. (Ed.). (1967). Social indicators. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blomquist, G. C., Berger, M. C., & Hoehn, J. P. (1988). New estimates of quality of life in urban areas. The American Economic Review, 78(1), 89–107.Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, R., & Savageau, D. (1981). Places rated almanac. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  5. Boyer, R., & Savageau, D. (1985). Places rated almanac. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  6. Boyer, R., & Savageau, D. (1989). Places rated almanac. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Brule, T. (2009). The city of your dreams, Financial Times, ‘House and home’, June 13/14, p. 1.Google Scholar
  8. Cicerchia, A. (1996). Measures of optimal centrality: Indicators of city effect and urban overloading. Social Indicators Research, 46, 276–299.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, W. A. V., & Ledwith, V. (2006). Mobility, housing stress, and neighborhood contexts: Evidence from Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A, 38(6), 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coughlin, R. E. (1970). Goal attainment levels in 101 metropolitan areas (Discussion Paper No. 41). Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute, .Google Scholar
  11. Culyer, A. J., Lavers, R. J., & Williams, A. (1972). Health indicators. In S. Shaw & A. Scheonfield (Eds.), Social indicators and social policy (pp. 94–118). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  12. Cummins, R. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cummins, R., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cutter, S. (1985). Rating places: A geographer’s view on quality of life. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.Google Scholar
  15. D’Andrea, S. S. (1998). Italian quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 44(1), 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dahmann, D. C. (1985). Assessments of neighborhood quality in metropolitan America. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 20(4), 511–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. General Statistical Office. (1970). Social Trends, No. 1. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  19. Gross, B. M. (1966). The state of the nation: Social systems accounting. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Gross, B. M. (1967). Social goals and indicators for American Society. Philadelphia: American Academy for Political and Social Science.Google Scholar
  21. Hoffenberg, M. (1970). Comments on ‘Measuring progress towards social goals: Some possibilities and at national and local levels’ [Terelekyj, 1970]. Management Science, 16, B779–B783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, M. V., & Flax, M. J. (1970). The quality of life in metropolitan Washington, D.C: Some statistical benchmarks. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Land, K. C. (1970). Social indicators. In R. B. Smith (Ed.), Social science methods (pp. 216–232). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Landis, J. D., & Sawicki, D. S. (1988). A planners guide to the places rated almanac. Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(3), 336–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu, B. (1975). Quality of life indicators in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1970. Washington: Washington Environmental Research Center.Google Scholar
  26. Lu, M. (1998). Analyzing migration decision making: Relationships between residential satisfaction, mobility intentions, and moving behavior. Environment and Planning A, 30(8), 1473–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marans, R. W. (2003). Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: The 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCrea, R. (2007). Urban quality of life: Linking objective dimensions and subjective evaluations of the urban environment. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  29. McVeigh, T. (1971). Social indicators: A bibliography. Monticello: Council of Planning Librarians Exchange Bibliography No. 52.Google Scholar
  30. Moser, C. (1970). Measuring quality of life. New Society, 428, 1042–1043. Dec.10.Google Scholar
  31. Perle, E. D. (1970). Social reporting in Michigan: Problems and issues, Office of Planning Coordination, Bureau of Policies and Programs (Technical Report A 37). State of Michigan.Google Scholar
  32. Perloff, H. (1969). A framework for dealing with the urban environment: Introductory statement. In H. Perloff (Ed.), The quality of the urban environment (pp. 3–25). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  33. Perz, S. G. (2000). The quality of urban environments in the Brazilian Amazon. Social Indicators Research, 49(2), 181–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogerson, R. J., Findlay, A. M., Morris, A. S., & Coombes, M. G. (1989). Indicators of Quality of Life – Some Methodological Issues. Environment and Planning A, 21(12), 1655–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Santos, L. D., & Martins, I. (2007). Monitoring urban quality of life: The Porto experience. Social Indicators Research, 80(2), 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Savageau, D. (2007). Places Rated Almanac: The classic guide to finding the best places to live. Washington, DC: Places Rated Books LLC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scheonfield, A., & Shaw, S. (Eds.). (1972). Social indicators and social policy. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  38. Schwirian, K. P., Nelson, A. L., & Schwirian, P. M. (1995). Modeling urbanism – Economic, social and environmental-stress in cities. Social Indicators Research, 35(2), 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sheldon, E. B. & Moore, W. E. (Eds.). (1968) Indicators of social change: Concepts & measurements. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, D. M. (1972). Towards a geography of social well-being: inter-state variations in the United States. In R. Peet (Ed.), Geographical perspectives on American poverty, Antipode monographs in Social Geography, No. 1 (pp. 17–46).Google Scholar
  41. Smith, D. M. (1973). The geography of social well-being in the United States: An introduction to territorial social indicators. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, D. M., & Gray, R. J. (1972). Social indicators for Tampa, Florida (Mimeo Report). Urban Studies Bureau, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  43. Stagner, R. (1970). Perceptions, aspirations, frustrations, and satisfactions: An approach to urban indicators. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 388, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stover, M. E., & Leven, C. L. (1992). Methodological issues in the determination of the quality-of-life in urban areas. Urban Studies, 29(5), 737–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. The Urban Institute. (1971, May–June). Developing urban indicators: Some first steps, Search, 1(3). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  46. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. (1969). Toward a social report. Washington, DC: USGPO.Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Office of Education. (1969). Toward master social indicators, Research Memorandum 67. Washington, DC: Educational Policy Research Center.Google Scholar
  48. Wilson, J. (1969). Quality of life in the United States. Kansas City: Midwest Research Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Urban Research Infrastructure Network (AURIN), Faculty of Architecture, Building and PlanningUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations