Advertisement

Challenges for Quality of Urban Life Research

  • Robert W. MaransEmail author
  • Robert Stimson
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 45)

Abstract

This concluding chapter reviews the goals for the book and the approach taken in achieving them. A key goal is providing a comprehensive review of alternative approaches to measuring, analyzing, and using quality of urban life (QOUL) research. The approach has been to accomplish this from a historical, theoretical, and methodological perspective. The practical perspective was illustrated through a series of QOUL case studies undertaken on different parts of the world. Shortcomings of the volume are then discussed as well as challenges for its contributors and for QOUL researchers elsewhere.

Keywords

Geographic Information System Aerial Photography Urban Policy Urban Life Sustainability Indicator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ballas, D., Clarke, G., Dorling, D., Rigby, J., & Wheeler, B. (2006). Using geographical information systems and spatial microsimulation for the analysis of health inequalities. Health Informatics Journal, 12, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bok, D. C. (2010). The politics of happiness: What government can learn from the new research on well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Centre for Bhutan Studies; Gross National Happiness (2008). http://www.grossnationalhappiness.com/Default.aspx
  4. City of Winnipeg Quality of Life Indicators (n.d.). http://www.iisd.org/pdf/wpg.qoli.pdf
  5. Clarke, G. P. (Ed.). (1996). Microsimulation for urban and regional policy analysis. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  6. Couper, M. P. (2008). Designing effective web surveys. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ester, P., Vinken, H., van Dun, L., Beckers, T., & Koning, J. (2002). The contented citizen. How Brabant citizens evaluate their quality of life. Tilburg: Globus (220 pp.)Google Scholar
  8. Fernandez, L. E., Brown, D. G., Marans, R. W., & Nassauer, J. I. (2005). Characterizing locational preference in an exurban population: Implications for agent-based modeling. Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design, 32, 799–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferris, A. L. (2010). Approaches to improving the quality of life: How to enhance the quality of life. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frey, B. S. (2011). Happy people live longer. Science, 331(6017), 542–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gahin, R., & Paterson, C. (2003). Community indicators: Past, present, and future. National Civic Review, 90, 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilbert, D. T. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Internet World Stats: Usage and population statistics (2011). http://www.internetworldstats.com/
  15. Jacksonville Community Council, Inc. Citizens building a better community (n.d.). http://www.jcci.org/jcciwebsite/pages/indicators.html
  16. Lora, E., Powell, A., van Praag, B. M. S., & Sanguinetti, P. (2010). The quality of life in Latin American cities: Markets and perception. Washington, DC: The Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  17. Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). The how of happiness: A scientific approach to getting the life you want. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  18. Marans, R. W. (2005). Modeling residential quality using subjective and objective measures. In D. U. Vestbro, Y. Hourol, & N. Wilkinson (Eds.), Methodologies in housing research. Gateshead, Tyne & Wear: The International Press.Google Scholar
  19. Paramo, P., & Garcia-Gil, M. E. (Eds.). (2010). La Dimension Social del Spacio Publico: Aportes para la Dalidad de Vida Urbana. to Human Dimensions of Public Space. Bogota: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional and Universidad Santo Tomás.Google Scholar
  20. Phillips, R. (2003). Community Indicators: Planning Advisory Service Report 517 Washington, DC: American Planning Association.Google Scholar
  21. Phillips, R. (Ed.). (2005). Community indicators measuring systems. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  22. Portney, K. E. (2003). Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American cities. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Schaffer, D., & Vollmer (Rapporteurs), D. (2010). Pathways to urban sustainability: Research and development on urban systems. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sirgy, J. M., Phillips, R., & Rahtz, D. (Eds.). (2009). Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases IV. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Sustainable Seattle (n.d.). http://www.sustainableseattle.org
  26. Sustainable Seattle’s Happiness Initiative (n.d.). http://www.sustainableseattle.org/sahi
  27. University of Michigan, Panel Study for Income Dynamics (2011). http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/
  28. Weiner, E. (2008). The geography of bliss. New York: Hachette book Group USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Australian Urban Research Infrastructure Network (AURIN), Faculty of Architecture, Building and PlanningUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations