Skip to main content

Disaggregating the Measurement of Quality of Urban Life Dimensions Across a Complex Metro Region: The Case of Metro Detroit

Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS,volume 45)

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) is influenced by multiple socioeconomic, psychological, and geographical factors. Earlier research has demonstrated that relationships exist between selected socioeconomic, demographic, and psychological factors and QOL. However, the influence of geographic factors on QOL has not been as extensively explored. This chapter investigates the geographic patterns of QOL in Metro Detroit and explores appropriate scales for examining spatial patterns showing QOL differences. Data from the 2001 Detroit Area Study are used to examine QOL at two geographic scales: the type of place where respondents live and their county of residence. Type of place is a composite measure consisting of type of governmental unit, its population size, and its geographic relation to the metro area’s urban core (Detroit). The analysis indicates that a more accurate picture of QOL differences within a large metropolitan area can be portrayed when considering both geographic scales simultaneously. Multiple-scale analysis enables policy makers to focus on specific geographic areas where enhancements might be made to improve the lives of people.

Keywords

  • Life Satisfaction
  • Census Tract
  • Geographic Scale
  • Urban Core
  • Local Park

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1742-8_16
  • Chapter length: 16 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-007-1742-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 16.1
Fig. 16.2
Fig. 16.3
Fig. 16.4
Fig. 16.5

References

  • Baker, D. A., & Palmer, R. J. (2006). Examing the effects of perceptions of community and recreation participation on quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 32, 395–418.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S. L., Towsley, G. L., Caserta, M. S., Lindau, K., & Dudley, W. N. (2009). Symptom experiences and quality of life of rural and urban older adult cancer survivors. Cancer Nursing, 32(5), 359–369.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293–301.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., & Dobash, R. P. (1972). Preferences for community living and their implication for population redistribution. Pullman: Washington State University Agricultural Experimentation Station. Bulletin 764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., & Tremblay, K. R. (1977). The quality of life in rural America. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 429, 115–129.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, D., Thomas, T., Logothetti, T., & Cox, S. (1974). City size and the quality of life. Washington, DC: The Stanford Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epley, D. R., & Menon, M. (2008). A method of assembling cross-sectional indicators into a community quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 88, 281–296.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. (1978). A research approach to improving our quality of life, American Psychologist, February, pp. 138–147.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2004). Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. American Economic Review, 94(3), 730–740.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Guterbock, T. M. (1997). The polls-review: Why Money Magazine’s “Best Places” keep changing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(2), 339–355.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, S. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring quality of life for national policy: From the Swedish level of living survey to an epistemology of the democratic process. Social Indicators Research, 58(1–3), 13–32.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73(6), 1943–1967.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., & Weng, Q. (2007). Measuring the quality of life in city of Indianapolis by integration of remote sensing and census data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(2), 249–267.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K., & Auld, C. (2002). The role of leisure in determining quality of life: Issues of content and measurement. Social Indicators Research, 58, 43–71.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W., Dillman, D., & Keller, J. (1980). Perception of life quality in rural America: An analysis of survey data from Four studies. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, R. B., & Sheppard, E. S. (2004). Introduction: Scale and geographic inquiry. In E. S. Sheppard & R. B. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moller, V. (1992). Spare time use and perceived well-being among black South African youth. Social Indicators Research, 26, 309–351.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., Matthews, S. A., O’Sullivan, D., Lee, B. A., Firebaugh, G., Farrell, C. R., et al. (2008). The geographic scale of metropolitan racial segregation. Demography, 45(3), 489–514.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama, T., Thompson, C. W., & Alves, S. (2009). Associations between neighborhood open space attributes and quality of life for older people in Britain. Environment and Behavior, 41(1), 3–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • The United States General Accounting Office. (2003). Forum on key national indicators: Assessing the nation’s position and progress. Washington, DC: GAO and The National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, H.-W., Schilling, O., Oswald, F., & Iwarsson, S. (2009). The home environment and quality of life-related outcomes in advanced old age: Findings of the ENABLE_AGE project. European Journal of Ageing, 6, 101–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S. J., Crews-Meyer, K. A., Crawford, T. W., & Welsh, W. F. (2004). Population and environment interactions: Spatial considerations in landscape characterization and modeling. In E. S. Sheppard & R. B. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry (pp. 41–65). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byoung-Suk Kweon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kweon, BS., Marans, R.W. (2011). Disaggregating the Measurement of Quality of Urban Life Dimensions Across a Complex Metro Region: The Case of Metro Detroit. In: Marans, R., Stimson, R. (eds) Investigating Quality of Urban Life. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1742-8_16

Download citation