Disaggregating the Measurement of Quality of Urban Life Dimensions Across a Complex Metro Region: The Case of Metro Detroit
Quality of life (QOL) is influenced by multiple socioeconomic, psychological, and geographical factors. Earlier research has demonstrated that relationships exist between selected socioeconomic, demographic, and psychological factors and QOL. However, the influence of geographic factors on QOL has not been as extensively explored. This chapter investigates the geographic patterns of QOL in Metro Detroit and explores appropriate scales for examining spatial patterns showing QOL differences. Data from the 2001 Detroit Area Study are used to examine QOL at two geographic scales: the type of place where respondents live and their county of residence. Type of place is a composite measure consisting of type of governmental unit, its population size, and its geographic relation to the metro area’s urban core (Detroit). The analysis indicates that a more accurate picture of QOL differences within a large metropolitan area can be portrayed when considering both geographic scales simultaneously. Multiple-scale analysis enables policy makers to focus on specific geographic areas where enhancements might be made to improve the lives of people.
KeywordsLife Satisfaction Census Tract Geographic Scale Urban Core Local Park
- Dillman, D. A., & Dobash, R. P. (1972). Preferences for community living and their implication for population redistribution. Pullman: Washington State University Agricultural Experimentation Station. Bulletin 764.Google Scholar
- Elgin, D., Thomas, T., Logothetti, T., & Cox, S. (1974). City size and the quality of life. Washington, DC: The Stanford Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Marans, R. W., Dillman, D., & Keller, J. (1980). Perception of life quality in rural America: An analysis of survey data from Four studies. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
- The United States General Accounting Office. (2003). Forum on key national indicators: Assessing the nation’s position and progress. Washington, DC: GAO and The National Academies.Google Scholar
- Walsh, S. J., Crews-Meyer, K. A., Crawford, T. W., & Welsh, W. F. (2004). Population and environment interactions: Spatial considerations in landscape characterization and modeling. In E. S. Sheppard & R. B. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry (pp. 41–65). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar