Advertisement

Subjective Quality of Life in Queensland: Comparing Metropolitan, Regional and Rural Areas

  • Rod McCreaEmail author
  • Mark Western
  • Tung-Kai Shyy
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 45)

Abstract

The chapter provides a comparison of the subjective assessment of quality of life (QOL) across different scales of urban communities in Queensland, Australia. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survey data relating to respondents’ assessments of four main attributes of urban environments are presented, namely, access to services and facilities, noise pollution, incivilities and social capital. Specific hypotheses are tested to determine if and how subjective QOUL in regional cities and towns differ from those in metropolitan and rural areas, and which main attributes of urban environments best distinguish regional cities and towns from metropolitan and rural areas.

Keywords

Social Capital Urban Environment Urban Center Discriminant Function Analysis Noise Pollution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The 2008 Living in Queensland Survey was funded as part of an Australian Research Council Linkage Project (#LP0775040) with additional support from the Queensland Public Sector Union (QPSU).

References

  1. Archibugi, F. (2001). City effect and urban overload as program indicators of the regional policy. Social Indicators Research, 54(2), 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006a). 2006 Census of population and housing (customised data extraction). Canberra: Australia Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006b). Census dictionary (2901.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006c). Statistical geography volume 1: Australian Standard Geographic Classification (ASGC) 2006 (1216.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2007). Census of population and housing: Census geographic areas digital boundaries, Australia, 2006 (2923.0.30.001). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  6. Besser, T. L. (2009). Changes in small town social capital and civic engagement. Journal of Rural Studies, 25(2), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boreham, P., Dow, G., Western, M., & Laffan, W. (2008). The living in Queensland survey [electronic data file for wave 1 – 2008]. Brisbane: Institute for Social Science Research (ISSR)/The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  8. Burgess, E. (1967 [1925]). The growth of the city: Metropolitan structure and violent crime. In R. E. Park & E. W. Burgess (Eds.), The city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bursik, R. J., Jr. (1999). The informal control of crime through neighborhood networks. Sociological Focus, 32(1), 85–97.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Cicerchia, A. (1999). Measures of optimal centrality: Indicators of city effect and urban overloading. Social Indicators Research, 46, 276–299.Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Davidson, W. B., & Cotter, P. R. (1991). The relationship between sense of community and subjective well-being: A 1st look. Journal of Community Psychology, 19(3), 46–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farrell, S. J., Aubry, T., & Coulombe, D. (2004). Neighborhoods and neighbors: Do they contribute to personal well-being? Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaeser, E., Kolko, J., & Saiz, A. (2000). Consumer city (Working Paper 7790). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  17. Halseth, G., & Ryser, L. M. (2007). The deployment of partnerships by the voluntary sector to address service needs in rural and small town Canada. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(3), 241–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jongudomkarn, D., & Camfield, L. (2006). Exploring the quality of life of people in North Eastern and Southern Thailand. Social Indicators Research, 78(3), 489–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Labonte, R. (1999). Social capital and community development: Practitioner emptor. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 23(4), 430–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malecki, E. J., & Bradbury, S. L. (1992). Research-and-development facilities and professional labor: Labor-force dynamics in high technology. Regional Studies, 26(2), 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marans, R. W., & Rodgers, W. (1975). Toward an understanding of community satisfaction. In A. Hawley & V. Rock (Eds.), Metropolitan America in contemporary perspective (pp. 639–662). New York: Halsted.Google Scholar
  22. McCrea, R. (2008). Urban quality of life: Linking objective dimensions and subjective evaluations of the urban environment. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  23. McCrea, R., Shyy, T. K., & Stimson, R. (2006). What is the strength of the link between objective and subjective indicators of urban quality of life? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pagliccia, N., Apland, L., & Kazanjian, A. (1995). The impact of professional and personal satisfaction on perceptions of rural and urban: Some analytic evidence. Social Indicators Research, 34(3), 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2413–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perkins, D. D., & Taylor, R. B. (1996). Ecological assessments of community disorder: Their relationship to fear of crime and theoretical implications. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(1), 63–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prezza, M., Amici, M., Roberti, T., & Tedeschi, G. (2001). Sense of community referred to the whole town: Its relations with neighboring, loneliness, life satisfaction, and area of residence. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Proost, S., & Van Dender, K. (2001). The welfare impacts of alternative policies to address atmospheric pollution in urban road transport. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31(4), 383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Putnam, R. (1993). The prospectus community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 4, 35–42.Google Scholar
  30. Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 12, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rogerson, R., Findlay, A., Morris, A., & Coombes, M. (1989). Indicators of quality of life: Some methodological issues. Environment and Planning A, 21(12), 1655–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rogerson, R., Findlay, A., Paddison, R., & Morris, A. (1996). Class, consumption and quality of life. Progress in Planning, 45, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Romilly, P. (1999). Substitution of bus for car travel in urban Britain: An economic evaluation of bus and car exhaust emission and other costs. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 4(2), 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59(1), 79–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Skogan, W., & Maxfield, M. (1981). Coping with crime: Individual and neighborhood reactions. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collings College Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Talen, E. (2001). Traditional urbanism meets residential affluence – An analysis of the variability of suburban preference. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(2), 99–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walter-Busch, E. (2000). Stability and change of regional quality of life in Switzerland, 1978–1996. Social Indicators Research, 50(1), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Western, J., McCrea, R., & Stimson, R. (2007). Quality of life and social inclusion. International Review of Sociology, 17(3), 525–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams, A. S., & Jobes, P. C. (1990). Economic and quality-of-life considerations in urban rural migration. Journal of Rural Studies, 6(2), 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social Science ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Geography, Planning and Environmental ManagementThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations