Advertisement

Gerasimos

[Or Seeking Freedom from the Fregean Under the Description Methodology]
  • Terry PennerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 117)

Abstract

Hot, and tired, Christopher and I are just finishing our walk from the Academy to the Lyceum. We have not been drawn into truncating our journey, it is true, by the promise of some discussion with beautiful youths in a wrestling school. But I confess that my eye, fulfilling its evolutionary function, has, willy-nilly, selected some dark-eyed Greek beauties along the way with whom, in another life, I might well have paused for some philosophical conversation. We reach our destination, and find we have to get down on our hands and knees in order to peer under the solid fence, getting the only view of the Lyceum possible these days. Then we stand up, dust off our pants, and start back to the hotel. On the way, we find a likely looking bar with tables on the sidewalk, and stop for a little break.

Keywords

Prime Minister Real Nature Real Good Description Methodology Linguistic Turn 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Anagnostopoulos, M. 2003. “Desire for the Good in the Meno.” In Desire, Identity and Existence: Essays in Honour of T.M. Penner, edited by N. Reshotko, 171–91. Kelowna, Canada: Academic Printing & Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Frege, G. 1892/1997. “On Sinn and Bedeutung.” In The Frege Reader, edited and translated by M. Beaney, 151–71. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Penner, T. 1991. “Desire and Power in Socrates: the Argument of Gorgias 466a–468e that Orators and Tyrants have no Power in the City.” Apeiron 24(3):147–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Penner, T. and C. Rowe. 1994. “The Desire for Good: Is the Meno Consistent with the Gorgias?Phronesis 39(1):1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Penner, T. 1996. “Knowledge vs. True Belief in the Socratic Psychology of Action.” Apeiron 29:199–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Penner, T. 1997a. “Two Notes on the Crito: the Impotence of the Many, and ‘Persuade or Obey’.” Classical Quarterly 47(1):133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Penner, T. 1997b. “Socrates on the Strength of Knowledge: Protagoras 351B-357E.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 79(Heft 2):117–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Penner, T. 2000. “Socrates.” In The Cambridge History of Ancient Political Thought, edited by C.J. Rowe and M. Schofield, 164–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Penner, T. 2002. “The Historical Socrates and Plato’s Early Dialogues: Some Philosophical Questions.” In New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient, edited by J. Annas and C.J. Rowe, 189–212. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Penner, T. 2003. “The Forms, the Form of the Good, and the Desire for Good in Plato’s Republic.” The Modern Schoolman 80:191–233.Google Scholar
  11. Penner, T. 2004. “Towards a prudential reading of the Crito.” In Socrates: 2400 Years Since His Death. International Symposium Proceedings, edited by V. Karasmanis, 13–21: July 2001, Delphi: European Cultural Center of Delphi.Google Scholar
  12. Penner, T. 2005a. “Platonic Justice and what we mean by ‘justice’.” http://www.nd.edu/-plato/plato5issue/Penner.pdf (76 pp.).
  13. Penner, T. 2005b. “Socratic Ethics, Ultra-Realism, Determinism, and Ethical Truth.” In Virtue, Norms, & Objectivity: Issues in Ancient and Modern Ethics, edited by C. Gill, 157–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Penner, T. 2005c. “La Forme du Bien et le Bien de l’Homme: Quelque Problèmes d’Interpretation du passage 504A-509C de la Répulique.” In Études sur la République de Platon, Vol 2: De la Science, du Bien et des Mythes (a collection of papers on the Republic for a year-long seminar on the Republic at the Sorbonne, edited by M. Dixsaut with the collaboration of F. Teisserenc, written in French, pp. 177–207).Google Scholar
  15. Penner, T. 2006a. “The Forms in the Republic.” In The Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic, edited by G. Santas, 234–62. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Penner, T. 2006b. “Plato’s Ethics: Early and Middle Dialogues.” In The Blackwell Guide to Plato, edited by M.L. Gill and P. Pellegrin, 151–69. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Penner, T. 2006c. “Forms and the Sciences in Plato.” In A Companion to Plato, edited by H. Benson, 165–83. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Penner, T. 2007. “The Death of the so-called ‘Socratic Elenchus’.” The C.J. De Vogel Lecture at the 7th triennial meetings of the International Plato Society, in Würzburg, Germany, Summer 2005. In Gorgias-Menon, edited by M. Erler, M. Brisson, and L. Brisson, 3–19.Google Scholar
  19. Penner, T. and C.J. Rowe. 2005. Plato’s Lysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Santas, G. 1964/1979. “The Socratic Paradoxes.” Philosophical Review 73. Reprinted in Santas, G., Socrates. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations