Skip to main content

Lessons Learned: The Promise and Possibility of Educational Accountability in the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leading Student Assessment

Part of the book series: Studies in Educational Leadership ((SIEL,volume 15))

Abstract

This chapter reviews educational reform efforts in the United States beginning with the National Commission on Excellence in Education in 1981 and traces how student assessment has come to be associated with large-scale, centralized, high-impact testing. This approach has been instrumental in aligning curriculum to standards and disaggregating results to focus attention on student groups. However, unintended consequences have narrowed the curriculum, decreased time for instruction, and pushed students out of school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Associated Press. (2003, May 8). Bill would limit elementary testing days. Retrieved October 16, 2004, from http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031769526146

  • Black, P., & Dylan, W. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kapan, 80(2), 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Dylan, W. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G. W. (2002, January 8). President signs landmark no child left behind education bill. Retrieved May 22, 2008, from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020108-1.html

  • Center for Responsive Politics. (2009). Centre for responsive politics. Retrieved August 9, 2009, from http://www.opensecrets.org/

  • Commission on Presidential Debates. (2000, October 3). Unofficial debate transcript. Retrieved May 18, 2008, from http://www.debates.org/pages/trans2000a.html

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobyns, L., & Crawford-Mason, C. (1991). Quality or else. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ED.gov website http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/4pillars.html

  • Education Austin. (2007). Legislature’s 10% cap could mean relief: Putting the lid on overtesting in AISD. Retrieved August 9, 2009, from http://www.steamybowl.com/ea/legislatures10cap.pdf

  • Eisner, E. W. (2001). What does it mean to say a school is doing well? Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N. (2004). Who’s in charge here? The tangled web of school governance and policy. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, C. W. (2007). Reclaiming assessment: A better alternative to the accountability agenda. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, C. W. (2008). Democratic policy making and the arts of engagement. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(5), 340–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, W. (1990). The quality school: Managing students without coercion. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, C. (2004). Letters to the next president: What we can do about the real crisis in public education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goals. (2000). Educate America Act of 1994. Retrieved August 27, 2011 from http://www2.ed.gov/legislation/GOALS2000/TheAct/index.html

  • Heilig, J. V., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Accountability Texas-style: The progress and learning of urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 75–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heldsinger, S. (2008). Using a measurement paradigm to guide classroom assessment processes. Presentation at the International Perspectives on Student Assessment Lecture Series, University of Calgary and University of Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard, A. G. (1991). Do we have the will to educate all children? Educational Leadership, 49(1), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard, A. G. (1998). The standards movement: Quality control or decoy? Rethinking Schools: An Urban Educational Journal Online, 12(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, R. (2000, June). NAEP becoming an offer states can’t refuse: ‘Godfather’ strategy usurps state sovereignty. School Reform News: The Heartland Institute. Retrieved May 18, 2008, from http://www.heartland.org

  • Institute for Education Sciences. (2009). National assessment of educational progress: The nations report card. National Center for Educational Statistics, US Department of Education. Retrieved August 9, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/

  • Kohlberg, L., & Mayer, R. (1972). Development as the aim of education. Harvard Educational Review, 42(4), 449–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhaber, M. (2004). Appropriate and inappropriate forms of testing, assessment, and accountability. Educational Policy, 18(1), 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). The Education Debt. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (2008, February). School leadership, evidence-based decision making and large-scale assessment. Lecture at the International Perspectives on Student Assessment Lecture Series, University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, L. M. (2000). Creating new inequalities: Contradictions of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(10), 729–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, L. M., Coppola, E., Radigan, J., & Vasquez Heilig, J. (2008). Avoidable losses: High-stakes accountability and the dropout crisis. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 16(3), 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for education reform. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved May 18, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html

  • Nelson, S., & McGhee, M. (2004). Time off task: How test preparation is siphoning instructional time for students of color and students of poverty. Paper session presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Kansas City, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S., McGhee, M., Meno, L., & Slater, C. L. (2007a). Fulfilling the promise of educational accountability: A unique perspective. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(9), 702–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S., McGhee, M., Reardon, R., Gonzales, K., & Kent, C. (2007b). Supplanting teaching with testing: Does it raise test scores? Paper session presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the black-white achievement gap. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L., & Smith, M. L. (1986). Synthesis of research on school readiness and kindergarten retention. Educational Leadership, 44(3), 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, C. L. (2005). What does it mean to be an educated person? The School Administrator, 8(62), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summary of Goals. (2000). Educate America Act. Retrieved August 27, 2011 from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/envrnmnt/stw/sw0goals.htm

  • Texas Education Agency. (1998, September 1, 1998). Chapter 113. Texas essential knowledge and skills for social studies. Subchapter A. Elementary. Retrieved August 9, 2009, from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter113/ch113a.html#113.6

  • US Department of Education. (2009a). No child left behind. Retrieved August 9, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml

  • US Department of Education. (2009b). Reading first. Retrieved August 9, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/index.html

  • US Department of Education. (2009c). Early reading first. Retrieved August 9, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/earlyreading/index.html

  • US Department of Education. (2009d). Title I – Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged. Retrieved August 9, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg1.html

  • Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S. Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, D., Boone, M., & McGhee, M. (2001). Last volley in the culture wars? A critical sociocultural view of accountability. Journal of School Leadership, 11(3), 182–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles L. Slater .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slater, C.L., McGhee, M.W., Nelson, S.W., Meno, L.“. (2011). Lessons Learned: The Promise and Possibility of Educational Accountability in the United States. In: Webber, C., Lupart, J. (eds) Leading Student Assessment. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1727-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics