Advertisement

Mobile GIS and Location-Based Services

  • Mathias Lemmens
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnologies and the Environment book series (GEOTECH, volume 5)

Abstract

Traditional analogue fieldwork – using map, pen and paper – is increasingly becoming obsolete. Several developments in the ICT realm have firmly stimulated the transition from analogue to digital work flows in many if not all areas of geosciences and geo-information technology. The major driving force steering this transition is that the computer power of handheld devices has been extended to a level that speed of computation and manageable dataset sizes are comparable to what the desktop computers could accomplish just a few years earlier. Together with rapid adoption of the internet, this progress has triggered fitting mobile GIS systems and location-based services (LBS) into work processes requiring data collection in the field or geo-data use while, for example, on the road or on the water.

Keywords

Mobile Device Global Navigation Satellite System Global Navigation Satellite System Wireless Local Area Network General Packet Radio Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aoidh EM, McArdle G, Petit M, Ray C, Bertolotto M, Claramunt C, Wilson D (2009) Personalization in adaptive and interactive GIS. Ann GIS 15(1):23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Catarci T, de Leoni M, Marella A, Mecella M, Salvatore B, Vetere G, Dustdar S, Juszczyk L, Manzoor A, Truong HL (2008) Pervasive software environments for supporting disaster responses. IEEE Internet Comput January/February:26–37Google Scholar
  3. Clarke KC (2004) Mobile mapping and geographic information systems. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 31(3):131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dilo A, van Oosterom P, Hofman A (2009) Constrained tGAP for generalization between scales: the case of Dutch topographic data. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33(5):388–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Foerster T, Stoter J, Kraak M-J (2010) Challenges for automated generalisation at European mapping agencies: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. Cartogr J 47(1):41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerber R, Chuan GK (2000) Fieldwork in geography: reflections, perspectives and actions. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang B, Xie C, Li H (2005) Mobile GIS with enhanced performance for pavement distress data collection and management. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 71(4):443–451Google Scholar
  8. Klingseisen B, Leopold Ph (2006) Landslide hazard mapping in Austria: using GIS to develop a prediction method. GIM Int 20(12):41–43Google Scholar
  9. Konecny M, Zlatanova S, Bandrova TL (eds) (2010) Geographic information and cartography for risk and crisis management: towards better solutions. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Lemmens M (2005) Mobile mappers – features and applications: small, portable and accurate devices for GIS input. GIM Int 19(12):16–19Google Scholar
  11. Lemmens M (2010a) Mobile GIS systems: technical and business features. GIM Int 24(12):21–27Google Scholar
  12. Lemmens M (2010b) Mobile GIS systems: hardware and software. GIM Int 24(12):28–31Google Scholar
  13. McArdle G (2010) Personalised map interfaces: understanding mobile users. GIM Int 24(5):26–28Google Scholar
  14. Meijers M, van Oosterom P, Quak W (2009) A storage and transfer efficient data structure for variable scale vector data. In: Sester M, Bernard L, Paelke V (eds) Advances in GIScience. Springer, Berlin, pp 345–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Montoya L (2003) Geo-data acquisition through mobile GIS and digital video: an urban disaster management perspective. Environ Model Softw 18(10):869–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Niu X, Ma R, Ali T, Li R (2005) Intergation of mobile GIS and wireless technology for coastal management and decision-making. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 71(4):453–459Google Scholar
  17. Pundt H (2002) Field data collection with mobile GIS: dependencies between semantics and data quality. GeoInformatica 6(4):363–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sester M, Brenner C (2009) A vocabulary for a multiscale process description for fast transmission and continuous visualization of spatial data. Comput Geosci 35(11):2177–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stoter J, Visser T, van Oosterom P, Quak W, Bakker N (2010) A semantic-rich multi-scale information model for topography. Int J Geogr Inf Sci iFirst:1–25Google Scholar
  20. Tripcevich N (2004) Flexibility by design: how mobile GIS meets the needs of archaeological survey. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 31(3):137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tsou M-H (2004) Integrated mobile GIS and wireless internet map servers for environmental monitoring and management. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 31(3):153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Oosterom P (2009) Research and development in geo-information generalization and multiple representation. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33(5):303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Virrantaus K, Markkula J, Garmash A, Terziyan YV (2001) Developing GIS-supported location based services. Proceedings of WGIS’2001 1st international workshop on web geographical information systems, Kyoto, Japan, pp 423–432Google Scholar
  24. Vivoni ER, Camilli R (2003) Real-time streaming of environmental field data. Comput Geosci 29(4):457–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wagtendonk AJ, De Jeu RAM (2007) Sensible field computing; evaluating the use of mobile GIS methods in scientific fieldwork. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 73(6):651–662Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations