Advertisement

Subregional Variation in Upland Hardwood Forest Composition and Disturbance Regimes of the Central Hardwood Region

  • William Henry McNab
Chapter
Part of the Managing Forest Ecosystems book series (MAFE, volume 21)

Abstract

Oaks and hickories characterize the Central Hardwood Region, with its temperate, humid climate and deep soils. Several xerophytic species characterize stands on xeric sites; mesic sites usually have greater diversity of oaks and hickories and include maple, ash, beech, and yellow-poplar. Ice and wind storms are common disturbances across the region; wildland fires ignited by lightning are uncommon and generally confined to small, stand-size areas. Variable environmental conditions, topography, and forest species compositions from the eastern Appalachians to the western Ozarks can require different silvicultural prescriptions to create early successional habitats, even in stands of similar appearance.

Keywords

Sugar Maple Natural Disturbance Frost Free Season Early Successional Habitat Average Annual Precipitation Range 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson RC (1970) Prairies in the prairie state. Trans Ill State Acad Sci 63:214–221Google Scholar
  2. Bailey RG (1983) Delineation of ecosystem regions. Environ Manage 7:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey RG (1995) Description of the ecoregions of the United States. Misc Publ 1391, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, 108 pGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbour MG, Billings WD (2000) North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 708Google Scholar
  5. Barrett JW (1980) Regional silviculture of the United States. Wiley, New York, 551 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun EL (1950) Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Blackburn Press, Caldwell, 596 pGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleland DT, Freeouf JA, Keys JE Jr, Nowacki GJ, Carpenter CA, McNab WH (2007) Ecological subregions: sections and subsections of the conterminous United States. [Map on CD-ROM] (AM Sloan, cartographer), USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, Map scale 1:3,500,000Google Scholar
  8. Everham EM III, Brokaw NVL (1996) Forest damage and recovery from catastrophic wind. Bot Rev 62:113–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eyre EH (ed) (1980) Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, 148 p (with 1 map)Google Scholar
  10. Fenneman NM (1938) Physiography of eastern United States. McGraw-Hill, New York, 714 pGoogle Scholar
  11. Fralish JS (2003) The central hardwood forest: its boundaries and physiographic provinces. In: Van Sambeek JW, Dawson JO, Ponder F Jr, Loewenstein EF, Fralish JS (eds) Proceedings of the 13th central hardwood Forest conference, Gen Tech Rep NC-23, USDA Forest Service North Central Research Station, St. Paul, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  12. Greenberg CH, McNab WH (1998) Forest disturbance in hurricane-related downbursts in the Appalachian mountains of North Carolina. For Ecol Manage 104:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hicks RR Jr (1998) Ecology and management of central hardwood forests. Wiley, New York, 412 pGoogle Scholar
  14. Hursh CR, Haasis FW (1931) Effects of 1925 summer drought on southern Appalachian hardwoods. Ecology 12:380–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuchler AW (1964) Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publ 36, American Geographical Society. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Lemon PC (1961) Forest ecology of ice storms. Bull Torrey Bot Club 88:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lobeck AK (1957) Physiographic diagram of the United States. Geographical Press, Maplewood, 8 pGoogle Scholar
  18. Natural Resources Conservation Service (2006) Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. Agri Handbook 296, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, 669 pGoogle Scholar
  19. Rohrig E, Ulrich B (1991) Temperate deciduous forests – ecosystems of the world – 7. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 635Google Scholar
  20. Schnur GL (1937) Yield, stand, and volume tables for even-aged upland oak forests. Tech Bull 560. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, 87 pGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith WB, Miles PD, Vissage JS, Pugh SA (2004) Forest resources of the United States, 2002. Gen Tech Rep NC-241, USDA Forest Service North Central Research Station, St. Paul, 137 pGoogle Scholar
  22. Stephenson NL (1998) Actual evapotranspiration and deficit: biologically meaningful correlates of vegetation distribution across spatial scales. J Biogeogr 25:855–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thatcher RC, Searcy JL, Coster JE, Hertel GD (eds) (1981) The southern pine beetle. Tech Bull 1631, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, 267 pGoogle Scholar
  24. US North American Bird Conservation Initiative (2000) Bird conservation region descriptions; a supplement to the North American bird conservation initiative. In: Bird conservation regions map. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Arlington, 38 pGoogle Scholar
  25. USDA Forest Service (1967) Major forest types (map), the national atlas of the United States of America. Map scale 1:7,500,000. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. US Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Level III and IV ecoregions of the coterminous United States (map). Western Ecology Division. US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvalis. Map scale 1:7,500,000Google Scholar
  27. Vankat JL (1979) The Natural Vegetation of North America: An Introduction. Wiley, New York, p 261Google Scholar
  28. Wear DN, Greis JG, Walters N (2009) The southern forest futures project: using public input to define the issues. Gen Tech Rep SRS-115, USDA Forest Service Southeastern Research Station, Asheville, 17 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Whittaker RH (1975) Communities and Ecosystems. Macmillan, New York, p 385Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USDA Forest Service, Southern Research StationAshevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations