Pedagogical Quality in Preschool: A Commentary

Chapter
Part of the International perspectives on early childhood education and development book series (CHILD, volume 4)

Abstract

From the perspective of didactics and pedagogical quality, and in a review of the studies collected together in this book, the aim of this chapter is to discuss the conditions for children’s learning in preschool. This involves a reanalysis of central aspects in the content and the object of learning, the teacher’s approach, children’s learning and the learning environment. These areas have, in this review, been analysed from four specific quality dimensions. Focus here is on the pedagogical quality of teacher and child communication and interplay. The theoretical framework of pedagogical quality is constituted in an interactionistic and inter-subjective perspective. At the heart of this book is didactics, and the analyses of the studies indicate that preschool didactics is created in the interaction and communication between teacher, child and learning object. Depending on how these aspects interact with one another, the quality of didactics is constituted. The analyses show that high-quality teacher communication and interplay both benefit children’s participation, as well as having an influence upon the learning of different content.

Keywords

Learning Environment Pedagogical Quality Central Aspect Preschool Teacher Emotional Climate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Balaguer, I. (2004). Building a shared vision for quality. Children in Europe, 7, 8–9.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J Ball. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, J. (2004). Curriculum issues in national policy making. Keynote address to the EECERA conference, Malta, September 2, 2004. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brostrøm, S., & Veijleskov, H. (2009). Didaktik i børnehaven: Planer, principer og praksis (Didactics in preschool: Plans, principles, and practice). Fredrikshavn: Dofolo.Google Scholar
  7. Burchinal, M. R., Roberts, J. E., Riggins, R., Zeisel, S. A., Neebe, E., & Briant, D. (2000). Relating quality of centre-based child care to early cognitive and language development. Child Development, 71, 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, A., Kjørholt, A. T., & Moss, P. (2006). Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clifford, R., & Bryant, D. (2003). Multi-state study of pre-kindergarten. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  10. Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  11. Donabedian, A. (1980). The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. In A. Arbor (Ed.), Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring (Vol. 1). Michigan: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
  12. Karlsson, O. (1997). Från utvärdering till kvalitetssäkring: En kritisk granskning av utvecklingen inom utvärderingsfältet. In SoS-rapport 1997: 23, Röster om den svenska barnomsorgen: en antologi (pp. 113–128). Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  13. Karlsson, O. (2000). Praktikbaserad utvärdering i förskola och fritidshem. Utbildning & Demokrati, 9, 87–107.Google Scholar
  14. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Ministry of Education and Science. (2010). Curriculum for preschool Lpfö 98. Revised 2010. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  16. Moss, P., Dahlberg, G., & Pence, A. (2000). Getting beyond the problem with quality. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 8, 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moss, P. (2004). Setting the scene: A vision of universal children’s spaces. In Daycare Trust (Ed.), A new era for universal childcare? (pp. 19–28). London: Daycare Trust.Google Scholar
  18. National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (1991). Accreditation criteria and procedures. Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  19. National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2006). New NAEYC: Early childhood program standards and accreditation criteria. Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  20. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (1998). The NICHD Study of early child care. Psychiatric Times, 15(3), 71–72.Google Scholar
  21. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2002). Early child care and children’s development prior to school entry: Results from the NICHD study of early child care. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 133–164.Google Scholar
  22. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2005). Child care and children’s development. Results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., Burchinal, M. R., Clifford, R. M., Culkin, M. L., Howes, C., Kagan, S. L., Yazejian, N., Byler, P., Rustici, J., & Zelazo, J. (2000). The children of the cost, quality and outcomes study go to school. Technical report. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center.Google Scholar
  24. Pramling, I. (1994). Kunnandets grunder: Prövning av en fenomenografisk ansats till att utveckla barns sätt att uppfatta sin omvärld. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  25. Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Sheridan, S. (2003). Delaktighet som värdering och pedagogik. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 8, 70–84.Google Scholar
  26. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Schweinhart, L., Barnes, H., & Weikart, D. (1993). Significant benefits: The High-Scope Perry Preschool Study through age 27 (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, No. 10). Michigan: The High/Scope Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sheridan, S. (2001). Pedagogical quality in preschool: An issue of perspectives. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  29. Sheridan, S. (2007). Dimensions of pedagogical quality in preschool. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15, 198–217.Google Scholar
  30. Sheridan, S. (2009). Discerning pedagogical quality in preschool. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(3), 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sheridan, S., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2001). Children’s conceptions of participation and influence in preschool: A perspective of pedagogical quality. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2(2), 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheridan, S., Giota, J., Han, Y. M., & Kwon, J. Y. (2009a). A cross-cultural study of preschool quality in South Korea and Sweden: ECERS evaluations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 142–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sheridan, S., Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Johansson, E. (Eds). (2009b). Barns tidiga lärande. En tvärsnittsstudie om förskolan som miljö för barns lärande. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  34. Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2007). Creativity, communication and collaboration: The identification of pedagogic progression in sustained shared thinking. Asia- Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 2, 3–23.Google Scholar
  35. Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2010). A focus on pedagogy: Case studies of effective practice. In K. Sylva, E. Melhuish, P. Sammons, I. Siraj-Blatchford, & B. Taggart (Eds.), Early childhood matters: Evidence from the Effective Pre-school and Primary Education project. (pp. 149–165). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., Muttock, S., Gilden, R., & Bell, D. (2002). Researching effective pedagogy in the early years (Research Report, 356). Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Educational Studies.Google Scholar
  37. Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., & Melhuish, E. (2008). Towards the transformation of practice in early education: The effective provision of preschool education (EPPE) project. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sommer, D., Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Hundeide, K. (2010). Child perspectives and children’s perspectives in theory and practice. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  40. Sylva, K. (1994). School influences on children’s development. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(1), 135–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2004). The effective provision of preschool education (EPPE) project: Findings from preschool to end of key stage 1. London: University of London, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  42. Sylva, K., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Sammons, P., Melhuish, E., Elliot, K. et al. (2006). Capturing quality in early childhood through environmental rating scales. Early Child Research Quarterly, 21, 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2010). Early childhood matters. Evidence from the effective pre-school and primary education project. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Tobin, J. (2005). Quality in early childhood: An anthropologist’s perspective. Early Education and Development, 16, 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tobin, J., Wu, D. Y., & Davidson, D. H. (1989). Preschool in three cultures: Japan, China, and the United States. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. UN Convention. (1989). The UN Convention on the rights of the child. New York: United NationsGoogle Scholar
  47. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Building strong foundations for early learning. The U.S. Departments of Education’s Guide to High-Quality Early Childhood Education Programs.Google Scholar
  48. Wertsch, J. V. (2000). Vygotsky’s two minds on the nature of meaning. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 19–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education, Communication and LearningUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations