Advertisement

When Good Turns to Bad: An Examination of Governance Failure in a Not-for-Profit Enterprise

  • Chris Low
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy book series (SEEP, volume 39)

Abstract

This paper examines the assumption that is present in society (if not in law) that not-for-profit enterprises are unlikely to exhibit unethical behaviour in their governance function. It explores this issue by examining a recent case of governance failure within a not-for-profit social enterprise that had unethical behaviour at its root. This failure ultimately led to the organisation becoming bankrupt. A parallel is drawn with governance failures within the private sector which also resulted in bankruptcy. The paper draws on theories of governance and stakeholder management in order to reflect on whether unethical governance behaviour is a continuing threat to all sectors. In doing so, it concludes that there is merit in challenging the assumption that values-based organisations are immune to such a threat to their organisational existence.

Keywords

Corporate Governance General Meeting Stakeholder Involvement Music Industry Board Membership 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abzug, R., and J. Galaskiewicz. 2001. Nonprofit boards: Crucibles of expertise of symbols of local identities? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30: 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bart, C., and K. Deal. 2006. The governance role of the board in corporate strategy: A comparison of board practices in ‘For Profit’ and ‘Not For Profit’ organisations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2: 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berle, A.A., and G.C. Means. 1932/1991. The modern corporation and private property. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Bouckaert, L., and J. Vandenhove. 1998. Business ethics and the management of non-profit institutions. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 1073–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, W.A. 2002. Inclusive governance practices in nonprofit organizations and implications for practice. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 12: 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Child, J., and S.B. Rodrigues. 2004. Repairing the breach of trust in corporate governance. Corporate Governance 12: 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke, T. 2005. Accounting for Enron: Shareholder value and stakeholder interests. Corporate Governance 13: 598–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dart, R. 2004. The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14: 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donaldson, T., and L.E. Preston. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20: 65–91.Google Scholar
  10. Dunn, A., and C.A. Riley. 2004. Supporting the not-for-profit sector: The government’s review of charitable and social enterprise. The Modern Law Review 67: 632–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September 32–34.Google Scholar
  12. Goodpaster, K. 1993. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. In Applied ethics: A reader, ed. E.R. Winkler and J.R. Coombs, 229–248. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Grosvold, J., S. Brammer, and B. Rayton. 2007. Board diversity in the United Kingdom and Norway: An exploratory analysis. Business ethics: A European review 16: 344–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayden, E.W. 2006. Governance failures also occur in the non-profit world. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2: 116–128.Google Scholar
  15. Higgs, D. 2003. Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. London: Department of Trade and Industry, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  16. Hutton, W. 1995. The state we’re in. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  17. Iecovich, E. 2005. The profile of board membership in Israeli voluntary organisations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 16: 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klein, N. 2008. The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  19. Letza, S., X. Sun, and J. Kirkbride. 2004. Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance 12: 242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Low, C., and C. Cowton. 2004. Beyond stakeholder engagement: The challenges of stakeholder participation in corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mason, C., J. Kirkbride, and D. Bryde. 2007. From stakeholders to institutions: The changing face of social enterprise governance theory. Management Decision 45: 284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller-Millesen, J.L. 2003. Understanding the behaviour of nonprofit boards of directors: A theory-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32: 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Monks, R.A.G., and N. Minow. 2008. Corporate governance, 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Parker, L.D. 2007. Internal governance in the nonprofit boardroom: A participant observer study. Corporate governance 15: 923–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pearce, J. 2003. Social enterprise in anytown. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Ruigrok, W., S. Peck, and S. Tacheva. 2007. Nationality and gender diversity on Swiss corporate boards. Corporate Governance 15: 546–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Samra-Fredericks, D. 2000. Doing ‘Boards-In-Action’ research – an ethnographic approach for the capture and analysis of directors’ and senior managers’ interactive routines. Corporate Governance 8: 244–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silverman, D. 2000. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Sternberg, E. 2000. The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance 8: 3–10.Google Scholar
  30. Turnbull, S. 2007. Analysing network governance of public assets. Corporate Governance 15: 1079–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health SciencesUniversity of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations