Thoughts on Reform and the Sociology of Education: Toward Active Engagement
My background is in policy analysis, practice, and methodology, and I have some familiarity with cognitive theory and technology. In this paper, I focus on two areas important to the sociology of education: understanding change and measurement, methodology, and inference. Some of my comments may appear critical of the strength of the profession of the sociology of education, but they are not meant to be. This academic discipline has a rich and powerful history and has had a profound impact on our understanding of education from Durkheim’s observations on the education system as mirroring society to the early Coleman reports that do little to counteract that view, to the social mobility literature, the work on desegregation, school structure and school culture, and on the ways that education systems, institutions, and organizations at all levels behave. If I ask for more, it is only to honor the reality that the profession is strong enough to respond.
KeywordsSchool System Charter School Continuous Improvement Process Legitimate Judgment Smart Board
Special thanks go to the Spencer Foundation for their support and to George Bohrnstedt for his thoughtful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this paper.
- Beaton, A., and J. Chromy. 2007. Partitioning NAEP Trend Data. Commissioned by the NAEP Validity Studies Panel. AIR, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Bryk, A., and L. Gomez. 2008. Ruminations on reinventing an R&D capacity for educational improvement. IREPP Working Paper No. 2008-05, Institute for Research on Education Policy and Practice, Stanford.Google Scholar
- Christensen, C.M., M. Horn, and C.W. Johnson. 2008. Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Report of the National Science Foundation Task Force on Cyberlearning. 2008. Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge, p. 59.Google Scholar