Skip to main content

Values and Good Practice Pedagogy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1054 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will summarize research findings from the late 1980s to today that identify the clear link between a ‘values’ approach to learning and good practice pedagogy in eliciting maximum student effects as measured across a range of developmental factors, including academic attainment. The Carnegie Corporation Taskforce Report on Student Achievement (1994) will be identified as a keystone moment in which both the values and pedagogy agendas of the 1990s into the 2000s were pre-figured. Carnegie provided a holistic definition of learning that stretched the traditional conceptions beyond the more predictable matters of cognition, to include matters of communication, empathy, self-reflection and integrity as being as central to effective learning. This chapter will briefly highlight ways in which the values and pedagogy agendas have interfaced in research and classroom innovations internationally. Special attention is given to the Australian programs with which the authors have been associated and the demonstrated effects of such an approach on student achievement across the range of developmental measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arthur, J. (2003). Education with character: The moral economy of schooling. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J. (2010). Of good character: Exploration of virtues and values in 3–25 year-olds. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benninga, J., Berkowitz, M., Kuehn, P., & Smith, K. (2006). Character and academics: What good schools do. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 448–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, L. (2005). Dimensions of teaching. Curriculum and Teaching, 20(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruer, J. (1999). In search of…brain-based education. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 648–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (1996). Social trust: A moral resource for school improvement. Chicago, Consortium on Chicago School Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 412630).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Corporation. (1996). Years of promise: A comprehensive learning strategy for America’s children. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397995). http://eric.ed.gov. Accessed 7 June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2006). The moral roots of citizenship: Reconciling principle and character in citizenship education. Journal of Moral Education, 35(4), 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2007). Character in teaching. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(4), 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow and the feeling brain. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). What matters most: A competent teacher for every child. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEETYA. (1994). Whereas the people: Civics and citizenship education. Canberra: Civics Expert Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEEWR. (2008). At the heart of what we do: Values education at the centre of schooling. Report of the ValuesEducation Good Practice Schools Project—Stage 2. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/VEGPSP-2_final_3_execsummary.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2011.

  • DEST. (2003). Values education study. (Executive summary final report) Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/VES_Final_Report14Nov.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2011.

  • DEST. (2005). National Framework for Values Education in Australian schools. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/Framework_PDF_version_for_the_web.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2011.

  • DEST. (2006). Implementing the National Framework for Values Education in Australian Schools. Report of the Values Education Good Practice Schools Project—Stage 1: Final Report, September 2006. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/VEGPS1_FINAL_REPORT_081106.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2011.

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1929). The sources of a science of education. New York: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrer, F. (2000). A quiet revolution: Encouraging positive values in our children. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2004). It’s official: Teachers make a difference. Educare News, 144, 24, 26, 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, N. (2009). Values and quality teaching at West Kidlington Primary School. In T. Lovat & R. Toomey (Eds.), Values education and quality teaching: The double helix effect (pp. 105–120). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Immordino-Yang, M., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affect and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden, W., Rohl, M., Barrat Pugh, C., Brown, C., Cairney, T., Elderfield, J. et al. (2004). In teachers’ hands: Effective literacy teaching practices in the early years of schooling. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training. http://inteachershands.education.ecu.edu.au/. Accessed 7 June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T. (2009). What works: Values and wellbeing pedagogy as best practice. Keynote Address at Australian Government National Values Education Conference, Canberra, ACT, Australia (pp. 18–24). http://www.valueseducation.edu.au/verve/_resources/2009_National_Values_Education_Conference_Report_FINAL.pdf. pp. 18–24. Accessed 7 June 2011.

  • Lovat, T., & Toomey, R. (Eds.). (2007). Values education and quality teaching: The double helix effect. Sydney: Barlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., & Toomey, R. (Eds.). (2009). Values education and quality teaching: The double helix effect. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., Toomey, R., & Clement, N. (Eds.). (2010). International research handbook on values education and student wellbeing. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., Toomey, R., Clement, N., Crotty, R., & Nielsen, T. (2009a). Values education, quality teaching and service learning: A troika for effective teaching and teacher education. Sydney: Barlow.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., Toomey, R., Dally, K., & Clement, N. (2009b). Project to test and measure the impact of values education on student effects and school ambience. Report for the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) by The University of Newcastle. Canberra: DEEWR. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/Project_to_Test_and_Measure_the_Impact_of_Values_Education.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2011.

  • MCEETYA. (1999). Adelaide declaration on national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century. Canberra: Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth affairs. http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/publications,11582.html. Accessed 7 June 2011.

  • MCEETYA. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Canberra: Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/default.asp?id = 25979. Accessed 7 June 2011.

  • Newmann, F., & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2002). Educating moral people: A caring alternative to character education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW. (1912). Public Instruction Act of 1880 and regulations. Sydney: Gullick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L., & Narvaez, D. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of moral and character education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2007). Inspection report: West Kidlington Primary School, 21–22 March, 2007. Manchester: Office for Standards in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, S., & Australian College of Educators. (Eds.). (2002). Values in education: College year book 2002. Canberra: Australian College of Educators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qld. (1999). Report of the Queensland school reform longitudinal study. Brisbane: Education Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D., & Strangman, N. (2007). Universal design for learning: Meeting the challenge of individual learning differences through a neurocognitive perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K.J. (2004). In good hands? The importance of teacher quality. Educare News, 149, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence Lovat .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lovat, T., Dally, K., Clement, N., Toomey, R. (2011). Values and Good Practice Pedagogy. In: Values Pedagogy and Student Achievement. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1563-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics