Advertisement

Heidegger and Authenticity

  • Peter Lucas
Chapter
Part of the Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy book series (LOET, volume 26)

Abstract

The Hegelian concept of recognition ties the ethics of self-interpretation to an ethic of self-realisation. However, it rests on essentialist claims about the nature and possibility of self-knowledge that are unlikely to be sympathetically viewed in the generally liberal and anti-essentialist atmosphere of contemporary applied and professional ethics. This chapter aims to show how a non-essentialistic alternative might be developed, which preserves some key features of Hegel’s model, on the basis of Heidegger’s account of authenticity. Heidegger can be said to take a sceptical essentialist view of human nature. Just as knowledge remains an issue for the epistemological sceptic, even while he rejects it, so Heidegger’s approach to the question of what it is to be human acknowledges that our own being never ceases to be an issue for us, while recognising that to embrace any of the (ultimately instrumentally derived) self-conceptions that are available to us would be inauthentic.

Keywords

Human Nature Intentional Object Mere Means Instrumental Complex Categorial Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cooper, David. 1990. Existentialism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and time (trans: Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Heidegger, Martin. 1977a. Letter on humanism. In Martin Heidegger: Basic writings, ed. D.F. Krell, 193–242. San Francisco, CA: Harper.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, Martin. 1977b. The question concerning technology. In The question concerning technology and other essays, ed. Martin Heidegger (trans: Lovitt, W.), 3–35. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, Martin. 1988. The basic problems of phenomenology (trans: Hofstadter, A.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Heidegger, Martin. 1992. The metaphysical foundations of logic (trans: Heim, M.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Homer. 1965. The Odyssey (trans: Fitzgerald, R.). London: Panther.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, Edmund. 1964. The idea of phenomenology (trans: Alston, W.P. and Nahknikian, G.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  10. Husserl, Edmund. 1970a. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (trans: Carr, D.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, Edmund. 1970b. Logical investigations (trans: Findlay, J.N.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Husserl, Edmund. 1982. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy First Book (trans: Kersten, F.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Husserl, Edmund. 1995. Cartesian meditations (trans: Cairns, D.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  14. Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mulhall, Stephen. 1990. On being in the world: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on seeing aspects. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Plato. 1954. Euthyphro. In The last days of Socrates (trans: Tredennick, H.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Popper, Karl. 1945. The open society and its enemies, Vol. 2. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  19. Popper, Karl. 1963. Three views of human knowledge. In Conjectures and refutations, 97–119. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Putnam, Hilary. 1993. Meaning and reference. In Meaning and reference, ed. A.W. Moore, 150–161. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1989. Being and nothingness (trans: Barnes, H.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education and Social Sciences, University of Central LancashirePreston, LancashireUK

Personalised recommendations