Advertisement

Ecological Threats and Agricultural Opportunities of the Aquatic Cane-Like Grass Phragmites australis in Wetlands

  • Andreas P. MamolosEmail author
  • Anna E. Nikolaidou
  • Athina K. Pavlatou-Ve
  • Sofia K. Kostopoulou
  • Kiriaki L. Kalburtji
Chapter
Part of the Sustainable Agriculture Reviews book series (SARV, volume 7)

Abstract

Wetlands are some of the most biologically productive and dynamic natural ecosystems with multiple value for man and nature. Indeed wetlands provide goods and service such as water storing, floodwater trapping, and trapping of sediment and pollutants. Wetlands also affect climate change by absorbing CO2, storing and releasing heat, and harnessing sunlight using a rich variety of vegetation that supports animal life. However wetlands can be polluted by industrial and commercial operations, agricultural runoff and storm water. Wetlands are degraded by filling in and drainage for land development. Wetlands are also degraded by dredging for commercial and recreational water traffic. Dam construction and irrigation roads change the hydrological status of wetlands. Wetlands allow the growth of aquatic macrophytic vegetation such as the emergent Phragmites australis. P. australis is mainly a clonal plant occurring in natural areas. P. australis invasion in wetlands alters the structure and function of the ecosystem by reducing plant and animal biodiversity and changing hydrological regimes and nutrient cycles. This invasion leads to less food or cover for wildlife, decreased use of an area for recreational purposes and decreased availability of drinking and irrigating water. Several methods have been applied in order to control P. australis growth. Control methods include non ecological methods such as burning that releases CO2 in the atmosphere and chemical control with non-specific herbicides. Control methods include also ecological methods such as grazing and removal of above-ground biomass by cutting. Cuttings can in turn be used for on-farm application as green manure or sludge after energy production and compost production. An economic and ecological basis for accepting a beneficial role for P. australis is lacking. This report focuses on the possibility that people living near wetlands could produce compost using plant material from P. australis. Suitable use of compost in agriculture could reduce the fertilizer application and thereby reduce the environmental pollution, improve food security and soil productivity, and increase sustainability in the agroecosystems. It can also play role in the climate change because part of the organic C is released as CO2 in the atmosphere and the rest is consumed by the decomposers.

Biodiversity Common reed Compost production Management of reed Organic farming Vegetation Wetlands Burning CO2 Grazing Draining Dredging Disk harrowing Compost maturity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our gratitude to the Greek Biotope, Wetland Centre for the useful information and to the emeritus professor A. Gatzianas for his constructive criticism and helpful suggestions, allowing us to improve on the paper’s earlier version.

References

  1. Adamus PR, Stockwell LT (1983) A method for wetland functional assessment. US Transp. Fed. Highway Admin., Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler A, Karacic A, Weih M (2008) Biomass allocation and nutrient use in fast-growing woody and herbaceous perennials used for phytoremediation. Plant Soil 305:189–206Google Scholar
  3. Aggelides SM, Londra PA (2000) Effects of compost produced from town wastes and sewage sludge on the physical properties of a loamy and a clay soil. Bioresource Technol 71:253–259Google Scholar
  4. Ailstock MS, Norman CM, Bushmann PJ (2001) Common reed Phragmites australis: Control and effects upon biodiversity in freshwater non-tidal wetlands. Restor Ecol 9: 49–59Google Scholar
  5. Alho CJR, Lacher TE, Goncalves HC (1988) Environmental degradation in the Pantanal ecosystem of Brazil. BioScience 38:164–171Google Scholar
  6. Allirand JM, Gosse G (1995) An above-ground biomass production model for common reed (Phragmites communis Trin.) stand. Biomass Bioenerg 9:441–448Google Scholar
  7. Altieri M (1995) Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture. In: Altieri M (ed) Plant Disease Ecology and Management. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 307–320Google Scholar
  8. Altieri MA, Nicholls CI (2003) Soil fertility management and insect pests: harmonizing soil and plant health in agroecosystems. Soil Till Res 72(2):203–211Google Scholar
  9. Asaeda T, Karunaratne S (2000) Dynamic modeling of the growth of Phragmites australis: model description. Aquat Bot 67:301–318Google Scholar
  10. Asaeda T, Nam LH, Hietz P, Tanaka N, Karunaratne S (2002) Seasonal fluctuations in live and dead biomass of Phragmites australis as described by a growth and decomposition model: implications of duration of aerobic conditions for litter mineralization and sedimentation. Aquat Bot 73:223–239Google Scholar
  11. Asaeda T, Manatunge J, Fujino T, Sovira D (2003) Effects of salinity and cutting on the development of Phragmites australis. Wetl Ecol Manag 11:127–140Google Scholar
  12. Asaeda T, Rajapakse L, Manatunge J, Sahara N (2006) The effect of summer harvesting of Phragmites australis on growth characteristics and rhizome resource storage. Hydrobiologia 553:327–335Google Scholar
  13. Belete L, Egger W, Neunhauserer C, Insam H, Caballero B (2001) Can community level physiological profiles be used for compost maturity testing? Compost Sci Util 9:13–18Google Scholar
  14. Benito M, Masaguer A, Moliner A, Arrigo N, Palma RM, Effron D (2005) Evaluation of maturity and stability of pruning waste compost and their effect on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in soil. Soil Sci 170:360–370Google Scholar
  15. Benoit LK, Askins RA (1999) Impact of the spread of Phragmites on the distribution of birds in Connecticut tidal marshes. Wetlands 19:194–208Google Scholar
  16. Bernal MP, Paredes C, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Cegarra J (1998a) Maturity and stability parameters of composts with a wide range of organic wastes. Bioresource Technol 63: 91–99Google Scholar
  17. Bernal MP, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Paredes C, Roig A (1998b) Carbon mineralization from organic wastes at different composting stages during their incubation with soil. Agr Ecosyst Environ 69:175–189Google Scholar
  18. Best EPH, Verhoeven JTA, Wolff WJ (1993) The ecology of the Netherland’s wetlands: characteristics, threats, prospects and perspectives for ecological research. Hydrobiologia 265:305–320Google Scholar
  19. Biddlestone AJ, Gray KR, Thorairagan K (1991) A botanical approach to the treatment of wastewaters. J Biotechnol 17(3):209–220Google Scholar
  20. Brewer LJ, Sullivan DM (2003) Maturity and stability evaluation of composted yard trimmings. Compost Sci Util 11(2):96–112Google Scholar
  21. Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005) Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124:3–22Google Scholar
  22. Bulluck III LR, Brosius M, Evanylo GK, Ristaino JB (2002) Organic and synthetic fertility amendments influence soil microbial, physical and chemical properties on organic and conventional farms. Appl Soil Ecol 19:147–160Google Scholar
  23. Buttler A (1992) Permanent plot research in wet meadows and cutting experiment. Vegetatio 103:113–124Google Scholar
  24. Cheshire MV, Bedrock CN, Williams BL, Chapman SJ, Solntseva I, Thomsen I (1999) The immobilization of nitrogen by straw decomposing in soil. Eur J Soil Sci 50:329–341Google Scholar
  25. Committee on Characterization of Wetlands (1995) Wetlands. Characteristics and Boundaries, National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Cowie NR, Sutherland WJ, Ditlhogo MKM, James R (1992) The effects of conservation management of reed beds. II. The flora and litter disappearance. J Appl Ecol 29:277–284Google Scholar
  27. Cronk J, Fennessy MS (2001) Phragmites australis as a declining species in Europe. In: Cronk J, Fennessy MS (eds) Wetland Plants. CRC Press, Boca Roton, pp 317–320Google Scholar
  28. Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440:165–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. de Bertoldi M, Vallini G, Pera A (1984) Technological aspects of composting including modeling and microbiology In: Gasser JKR (ed) Composting of Agricultural and Other Wastes. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, pp 27–41Google Scholar
  30. Debosz K, Petersen SO, Kure LK, Ambus P (2002) Evaluating effects of sewage sludge and household compost on soil physical, chemical and microbiological properties. Appl Soil Ecol 19:237–248Google Scholar
  31. Diacono M, Montemurro F (2010) Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:401–422Google Scholar
  32. Dupré C, Diekmann M (2001) Differences in species richness and life-history traits between grazed and abandoned grasslands in southern Sweden. Ecography 24:275–286Google Scholar
  33. Eggen T, Vethe O (2001) Stability indices for different composts. Compost Sci Util 9:19–26Google Scholar
  34. Eiland F, Lind AM, Leth M, Iversen JJL, Klamer M, Jensen HEK (2001) C and N turnover and lignocellulose degradation during composting of Miscanthus straw and liquid pig manure. Compost Sci Util 9:186–197Google Scholar
  35. Engloner AI (2009) Structure, growth dynamics and biomass of reed (Phragmites australis) – A review. Flora 204:331–346Google Scholar
  36. Gaudet CL, Keddy PA (1995) Competitive performance and species distribution in shoreline plant communities: a comparative approach. Ecology 76:280–291Google Scholar
  37. Gerakis PA, Koutrakis ET (1996) Greek Wetlands. Commercial Bank of Greece, Goulandris Natural History Museum, Greek Biotope/Wetland Centre, English ednGoogle Scholar
  38. Gessner MO (2001) Mass loss, fungal colonisation and nutrient dynamics of Phragmites australis leaves during senescence and early aerial decay. Aquat Bot 69:325–339Google Scholar
  39. Grandy AS, Porter GA, Erich MS (2002) Organic amendment and rotation crop effects on the recovery of soil organic matter and aggregation in potato cropping systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1311–1319Google Scholar
  40. Granéli W (1989) Influence of standing litter on shoot production in reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin.ex Steudel. Aquat Bot 35:99–109Google Scholar
  41. Granéli W (1990) Standing crop and mineral content of reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Studel, in Sweden–Management of reed stands to maximize harvestable biomass. Folia Geobot Phytotaxon 25:291–302Google Scholar
  42. Granéli W, Weisner SEB, Sytsma MD (1992) Rhizome dynamics and resource storage in Phragmites australis. Wetl Ecol Manag 1:239–247Google Scholar
  43. Greeson PE, Clarke JR, Clark JE (1979) (eds) Wetland functions and values: the state of our understanding. American Water Resources Association, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  44. Grevilliot F, Broyer J, Muller S (1998) Phytogeographical and phenological comparison of the Meuse and the Saone valley meadows (France). J Biogeogr 25:339–360Google Scholar
  45. Gries C, Kappen L, Losch R (1990) Mechanism of flood tolerance in reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steudel. New Phytol 114:589–593Google Scholar
  46. Grime JP (2002) Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties, 2nd edn, Wiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  47. Grootjans AP, van Wirdum G, Kemmers R, van Diggelen R (1996) Ecohydrology in The Netherlands: principles of an application-driven interdiscipline. Acta Bot Neerl 45:491–516Google Scholar
  48. Gryseels M (1989a) Nature management experiments in a derelict reed marsh. I. Effects of winter cutting. Biol Conserv 47:171–193Google Scholar
  49. Gryseels M (1989b) Nature management experiments in a derelict reed marsh. II. Effects of summer mowing. Biol Conserv 48:85–99Google Scholar
  50. Güsewell S, Klötzli F (2000) Assessment of aquatic and terrestrial reed (Phragmites australis) stands. Wetl Ecol Manag 8:367–373Google Scholar
  51. Hansen B, Alrøe HF, Kristensen ES (2001) Approaches to assess the environmental impact of organic farming with particular regard to Denmark. Agr Ecosyst Environ 83:11–26Google Scholar
  52. Hansson PA, Fredriksson H (2004) Use of summer harvested common reed (Phragmites australis) as nutrient source for organic crop production in Sweden. Agr Ecosyst Environ 102:365–375Google Scholar
  53. Harris MB, Thomas W, Mourão G, Da Silva CJ, Guimarãews E, Sonoda F, Fachium E (2005) Safe quarding the Pantanal Wetland: threats and conservation initiatives. Conserv Biol 19:714–720Google Scholar
  54. Haslam S (1969) The development of shoots in Phragmites communis Trin. Ann Bot 33:695–709Google Scholar
  55. Hawke CJ, José PV (1996) Reedbed management for commercial and wildlife interests. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, UKGoogle Scholar
  56. Hellings SE, Gallagher JL (1992) The effects of salinity and flooding on Phragmites australis. J Appl Ecol 29:41–49Google Scholar
  57. Hill NM, Keddy PA, Wisheu IC (1998) A hydrological model for predicting the effects of dams on the shoreline vegetation of lakes and reservoirs. Environ Manage 22:723–736PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Hollis GE (1992) The hydrological functions of wetlands and their management. In: Gerakis PA (ed) Conservations and Management of Greek Wetlands. Proceedings of a Greek Wetlands workshop held in Thessaloniki, Greece, IUCN, Gland Switzerland, pp 9–60Google Scholar
  59. Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP (1977) The World’s Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USAGoogle Scholar
  60. Huijser MP, Meerburg BG, Holshof G (2004) The impacts of ditch cuttings on weed pressure and crop yield in maize. Agr Ecosyst Environ 102:197–203Google Scholar
  61. IPCC (2007) Agriculture. In: Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  62. Janhäll S, Andreae MO, Pöschl U (2010) Biomass burning aerosol emissions from vegetation fires: particle number and mass emission factors and size distributions. Atmos Chem Phys 10:1427–1439Google Scholar
  63. Jiang C, Fan X, Cui G, Zhang Y (2007) Removal of agricultural non-point source pollutants by ditch wetlands: implications for lake eutrophication control. Hydrobiologia 581:319–327Google Scholar
  64. Jiraungkoorskul W, Upatham ES, Kruatrachue M, Sahaphong S, Vichasri-Grams S, Pokethitiyook P (2003) Biochemical and histopathological effects of glyphosate herbicide on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Environ Toxicol 18:260–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Kay S (1995) Efficacy of wipe-on applications of glyphosate and imazapyr on common reed in aquatic sites. J Aqua Manage 33:25–26Google Scholar
  66. Keddy PA (1989) Effects of competition from shrubs on herbaceous wetland plants: a 4-year field experiment. Can J Bot 67:708–716Google Scholar
  67. Keddy PA (2010) Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation, 2nd edn. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge UKGoogle Scholar
  68. Keddy PA, Reznicek AA (1986) Great lakes vegetation dynamics: the role of fluctuating water levels and buried seeds. J Great Lakes Res 12:25–36Google Scholar
  69. Keller BEM (2000) Plant diversity in Lythrum, Phragmites and Typha marshes, Massachusetts, USA. Wetl Ecol Manag 8:391–401Google Scholar
  70. Koncalová H (1990) Anatomical adaptations to water logging in roots of wetland graminoids: limitations and drawbacks. Aquat Bot 38:127–134Google Scholar
  71. Kotowski W, van Diggelen R (2004) Light as an environmental filter in fen vegetation. J Veg Sci 15:583–594Google Scholar
  72. Kotowski W, van Andel J, van Diggelen R, Hogendorf J (2001) Responses of fen plant species to groundwater level and light intensity. Plant Ecol 155:147–156Google Scholar
  73. Lee SY (1990) Net aerial primary productivity, litter production and decomposition of the reed Phragmites communis in a nature preserve in Hong Kong: management implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 66:161–173Google Scholar
  74. Lenssen JPM, Menting FBJ, Van der Putten WH, Blom CWPM (1999) Control of plant species richness and zonation of functional groups along a freshwater flooding gradient. Oikos 86:523–534Google Scholar
  75. Leonardsson L (1994) Våtmarker som kvävefällor, Svenska och internationella erfarenheter. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Solna, Sweden (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  76. Maltby E, Barker T (2009) The Wetlands Handbook. Wiley-blackwell, UKGoogle Scholar
  77. Marks M, Lapin B, Randall J (1994) Phragmites australis (P. communis): threats, management and monitoring. Nat Area J 14:285–294Google Scholar
  78. Marrs RH, Frost AJ, Plant RA, Lunnis P (1993) Determination of buffer zones to protect seedlings of non target plants from the of glyphosate spray drift. Agr Ecosyst Environ 45:283–293Google Scholar
  79. Matthews GVT (1993) The Ramsar Convention on wetlands: its history and development, Ramsar Convention Bureau; GlandGoogle Scholar
  80. Mauchamp A, Blanch S, Grillas P (2001) Effects of submergence on the growth of Phragmites australis seedlings. Aquat Bot 69:147–164Google Scholar
  81. McConnell D, Shiralipour A, Smith W (1994) Compost impact on soil/plant properties, in Composting source separated organics. JG Press, Inc., Emmaus, PAGoogle Scholar
  82. Meyerson LA, Saltonstall K, Windham L et al. (2000) A comparison of Phragmites australis in freshwater and brackish marsh environments in North America. Wetl Ecol Manag 8:89–103Google Scholar
  83. Min DH, Islam KR, Vough LR, Weil RR (2003) Dairy manure effects on soil quality properties and carbon sequestration in alfalfa- orchardgrass systems. Commun Soil Sci Plan 34:781–799Google Scholar
  84. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (1993) Wetlands, 2nd edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold NYGoogle Scholar
  85. Ostendorp W (1989) “Die-back” of reeds in Europe- a critical review of literature. Aquat Bot 35:5–26Google Scholar
  86. Ostendorp W (1995) Effect of management on the mechanical stability of lakeside reeds in Lake Constance-Untersee. Acta Oecol 16:77–294Google Scholar
  87. Ostendorp W (1999) Management impacts on stand structure of lakeshore Phragmites reeds. Int Rev Hydrobiol 84:33–47Google Scholar
  88. Poff NL, Allen JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for conservation and restoration of riverine ecosystems. BioScience 47:769–784Google Scholar
  89. Prew RD, Ashby JE, Bacon ETG, Christian DG, Gutteridge RJ, Jenkyn JF, Powell W, Todd AD (1995) Effects of incorporating or burning straw, and of different cultivation systems, and of different cultivation systems, on winter wheat grown on two soil types 1985–1991. J Agric Sci 124:173–194Google Scholar
  90. Richardson CJ (1994) Ecological functions and human values in wetlands: A Framework for assessing forestry impacts. Wetlands 14(1):1–9Google Scholar
  91. Richardson CJ (1995) Wetlands ecology, in Encyclopedia of Environmental Biology, Vol. 3, Academic Press, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  92. Riemer DN (1973) Effects of rate, spray volume, and surfactant on the control of Phragmites with glyphosate. Proc Annu Meet Northeastern Weed Sci Soc 27:101–104Google Scholar
  93. Riemer DN (1976) Long-Term Effects of Glyphosate Applications to Phragmites. J Aquat Plant Manag 14:39–43Google Scholar
  94. Rolletschek H, Rolletschek A, Hartzendorf T, Kohl J (2000) Physiological consequences of mowing and burning of Phragmites australis stands for rhizome ventilation and amino acid metabolism. Wetl Ecol Manag 8(6):425–433Google Scholar
  95. Roman CT, Niering WA, Warren RS (1984) Salt marsh vegetation change in response to tidal restriction. Environ Manag 8:141–150Google Scholar
  96. Rooth JE, Stevenson JC, Cornwell JC (2003) The influence of 5 and 20 yr-old Phragmites populations on rates of accretion in an oligohaline tidal marsh of Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 26(2B):475–483Google Scholar
  97. Russell IA, Kraaij T (2008) Effects of cutting Phragmites australis along an inundation gradient, with implications for managing reed encroachment in a South African estuarine lake system. Wetl Ecol Manag 16:383–393Google Scholar
  98. Sánchez-Monedero MA, Roig A, Paredes C, Bernal MP (2001) Nitrogen transformation during organic waste composting by the Rutgers system and its effects on pH, EC and maturity of the composting mixtures. Bioresource Technol 78:301–308Google Scholar
  99. Schlegel AJ (1992) Effect of composted manure on soil chemical properties and nitrogen use by grain sorghum. J Prod Agric 5(1):153–157Google Scholar
  100. Schuyt K, Brander L (2004) The economic values of the world’s wetlands. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forest and Landscape (SAEFL), AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  101. Shuman LM, Dudka S, Das K (2002) Cadmium forms and plant availability in compost-amended soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33:737–748Google Scholar
  102. Silliman BR, Bertness MD (2004) Shoreline development drives invasion of Phragmites australis and the loss of plant diversity on New England salt marshes. Conserv Biol 18(5):1424–1434Google Scholar
  103. Skinner J, Zalewski S (1995) Functions and values of Mediterranean wetlands, Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Arles. A Med-Wet Publication, FranceGoogle Scholar
  104. Stockdale EA, Shepherd MA, Fortune S, Cuttle SP (2002) Soil fertility in organic farming systems-fundamentally different? Soil Use Manage 18:301–308Google Scholar
  105. Sullivan DM, Miller RO (2001) Compost quality attributes, measurements, and variability. In: Stoffella PJ, Kahn BA (eds) Compost utilization in horticultural cropping systems. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton Florida, pp 95–120Google Scholar
  106. Sun H, Brown A, Coppen J, Steblein P (2007) Response of Phragmites to environmental parameters associated with treatments. Wetl Ecol Manag 15:63–79Google Scholar
  107. Tester CF (1990) Organic amendment effects on physical and chemical properties of a sandy soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:827–831Google Scholar
  108. Tewksbury L, Casagrande R, Blossey B, Hafliger P, Schwarzlander M (2002) Potential for biological control of Phragmites australis in North America. Biol Control 23(2):191–212Google Scholar
  109. Thompson DJ, Shay JM (1985) The effects of fire on Phragmites australis in the Delta Marsh, Manitoba. Can J Bot 63:1864–1869Google Scholar
  110. Thompson DJ, Shay JM (1989) First-year response of a Phragmites marsh community to seasonal burning. Can J Bot 67:1448–1455Google Scholar
  111. Tomati U, Madejon E, Galli E (2000) Evolution of humic acid molecular weight as an index of compost stability. Compost Sci Util 8:108–114Google Scholar
  112. Toumpeli A (2009) Compost production from Phramites australis and its use in tomato cultivation. MS thesis, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (In Greek with an English summary)Google Scholar
  113. Tscharntke T (1989) Attach by stem-boring moth increases susceptivility of Phragmites australis to gall-making by a midge: mechanisms and effects of midge population dynamics. Oikos 55:92–100Google Scholar
  114. Tucker GC (1990) The genera of Arundinoideae (Gramineae) in the southeastern United States. J Arnold Arboretum 71:145–177Google Scholar
  115. van der Putten WH (1997) Die-back of Phragmites australis in European wetlands: an overview of the European research programme on reed die-back and progression (1993–1994). Aquat Bot 59:263–275Google Scholar
  116. van der Toorn J, Mook JH (1982) The influence of environmental factors and management on stands of Phragmites australis. I. Effect of burning, frost and insect damage on shoot density and shoot size. J Appl Ecol 19:477–500Google Scholar
  117. van Deursen EJM, Drost HJ (1990) Defoliation and treading by cattle of reed Phragmites australis. J Appl Ecol 27:284–297Google Scholar
  118. Verhoeven JTA (1992) Vegetation as a resource in wetlands with special reference to the wetlands in Greece. In: Gerakis PA (ed) Conservations and Management of Greek Wetlands, Proceedings of a Greek Wetlands Workshop held in Thessaloniki, Greece, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp 9–60Google Scholar
  119. Vincelas-Akpa M, Loquet M (1997) Organic matter transformations in lignocellulosic waste products composted or vermicomposted (Eisenia fetida andrei): chemical analysis and 13C CPMAS NMR spectroscopy. Soil Biol Biochem 29:751–758Google Scholar
  120. Vymazal J, Brix H, Cooper PF, Green MB, Haberl R (1998) (eds) Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment in Europe. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  121. Ward JV, Tockner K, Schiemer F (1999) Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regul River 15:125–139Google Scholar
  122. Warren RS, Fell PE, Grimsby JL, Buck EL, Rilling GC, Fertik RA (2001) Rates, patterns, and impacts of Phragmites australis expansion and effects of experimental Phragmites control on vegetation, macroinvertebrates, and fish within Tide lands of the Lower Connecticut River. Estuaries 24:90–107Google Scholar
  123. Weis JS, Weis P (2003) Is the invasion of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into tidal marshes of the eastern US an ecological disaster? Mar Pollut Bull 46:816–820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Weisner SEB, Ekstam B (1993) Influence of germination time on juvenile performance of Phragmites australis on temporarily exposed bottoms – implications for the colonization of lake beds. Aquat Bot 45(2–3):107–118Google Scholar
  125. Weisner SEB, Granéli W (1989) Influence of substrate conditions on the growth of Phragmites australis after a reduction in oxygen transport to below ground parts. Aquat Bot 35:71–80Google Scholar
  126. Wheeler BD, Proctor MCF (2000) Ecological gradients, subdivisions and terminology of north-west European mires. J Ecol 88:187–203Google Scholar
  127. Wilcox KL, Petrie SA, Maynard LA, Meyer SW (2003) Historical distribution and abundance of Phragmites australis at Long Point, Lake Erie, Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 29:664–680Google Scholar
  128. Yeh TY (2008) Removal of metals in constructed wetlands: Review. Pract Periodical of Haz Toxic and Radioactive Waste Mgmt 12(12):96–101Google Scholar
  129. Yermiyahu U, Keren R, Chen Y (2001) Effect of composted organic matter on boron uptake by plants. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1436–1441Google Scholar
  130. Zalidis GC, Mantzavelas AL (eds) (1994) Inventory of Greek Wetlands as Natural Resources (first approximation), Greek Biotope/Wetland Centre (EKBY), Thessaloniki, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  131. Zhou LX, Wong JWC (2001) Effect of dissolved organic matter from sludge and sludge compost on soil copper sorption. J Environ Qual 30:878–883PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas P. Mamolos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anna E. Nikolaidou
    • 1
  • Athina K. Pavlatou-Ve
    • 2
  • Sofia K. Kostopoulou
    • 2
  • Kiriaki L. Kalburtji
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Agriculture, Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental ProtectionAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Faculty of Agriculture, Laboratory of Soil ScienceAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations