Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Phaenomenologica ((PHAE,volume 206))

  • 790 Accesses

Abstract

EDITOR’S NOTE

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term syncretism is usually used negatively as a label for an uncritical mixing-together of elements from various philosophical systems. Schutz seems to introduce it here with a positive connotation, meaning a treating-together of ‘things’ which have been arbitrarily separated by the criticized analytical method.

  2. 2.

    The figures 1, 2, 3 were written at the end of this paragraph. They could have been meant as indicators of successive footnotes, since three notes were set down at the bottom of the page. However, it seems more likely that the three notes indicate three additional points Schutz intended to insert between this and the next paragraph. Leaning to the second explanation, I have placed them in the text.

  3. 3.

    According to the Cartesian theory of occasionalism, seemingly causal relations (e. g., between spirit and body) are merely occasioned by a third agent; they do not originate in the necessities of the corresponding phenomena themselves.

  4. 4.

    During his years of study, and possibly up to 1924, Schutz subscribed to a neo-Kantian position. The following paragraphs mark his radical departure from this philosophical approach.

  5. 5.

    I was unable to ascertain which edition of Kant’s writings Schutz was using.

  6. 6.

    This short paragraph has been lifted from a different short manuscript of UM 1925–1927a.

  7. 7.

    In ordinary German language, the verb dauern means to last, to persist. In this context, Schutz plays on his translation of Bergson’s term, “duree” by the noun Dauer but links the corresponding verb dauern to the meaning of the French noun. To translate the statement “Ich dauere” literally by “I persist” would be grossly misleading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schutz, A. (2013). Author’s Introduction. In: Barber, M. (eds) Collected Papers VI. Literary Reality and Relationships. Phaenomenologica, vol 206. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1518-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics