Comparison of Different Models



Many methodologies have been proposed to help the decision-making process, as has been mentioned and illustrated in  Chap. 3, where four different models were examined and examples and cases posed and solved, with indication of the pros and cons of each. However, no comparisons have been made between them, and this is the purpose of this chapter. Here the first table condenses information about technical characteristics of each methodology. A second one details main characteristics from the user point of view, and a third table briefly illustrates the successive steps to use each methodology. The chapter also enters in the domain of complex projects, considering size, interrelationships between alternatives and between criteria, thresholds, etc. Finally it goes through into commenting on the advantages of Linear Programming (LP) for solving complex situations. It is understood that there is no one methodology that is better than all others, however it is also believed that LP is probably the best suited to solve complex problems.


Comparison Complexity Classification Integration 


  1. *  Indicates suggested reading material not mentioned in text.Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez, M., Soria Alcaráz, J., García Ruiz, R. (2002). Investigación OperativaModelos y técnicas de optimización. Ed. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.Google Scholar
  3. Bouyssou, D. (1990). Building criteria: A prerequisite for MCD. In C. A. Bana e Costa (Ed.), Reading in multiple criteria decision aids. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. (1961). Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission Energy (2001). NNE5-2001-273: Development and application of a multi-criteria software decision analysis tool for renewable energy sources. (MCDA-RES).Google Scholar
  6. Ignizio, J. (1976). Goal programming and extensions. Lexington, Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  7. *Kumar, S., Hanna, A., Natarayan, P. (2003). Application of fuzzy linear programming in construction projects. International Journal of IT in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (IT-AEC), 4(1), 265–274. Chimay Anumba (Ed.).Google Scholar
  8. Munda, G. (2004). Métodos y procesos multicriterio para la evaluación social de las políticas públicas. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, 1, 31–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations