Advertisement

Globalization, Resources and Strategies: A Comparison of Universitas Indonesia and the Australian National University

  • Simon Marginson
  • Erlenawati Sawir
Chapter
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 36)

Abstract

In a networked global environment in which global, national and local nodes are often equivalent (Castells 2000) all research universities must pursue strategies for building global capacity and facilitating cross-border staff and student movement and research collaboration. The chapter compares readings of the global environment, global and international activities and relationships, and global capacity and strategy, among institutional and research leaders in parallel national universities, one in a middle-level developing country (Indonesia ) and the other in a middle-level developed country (Australia ). In both cases global elements are increasingly important in university strategy, mission and identity. But resource capacity remains highly dependent on national government and local students. The two cases differ in some respects. While both universities are peak national institutions, and each respects the other, the Australian university is more strongly placed in the global setting. Practical dealings between them are asymmetrical.

Keywords

International Student Purchasing Power Parity Foreign Student Domestic Student Global Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amaral, A., Meek, V., & Larsen, I (Eds.). (2003). The higher education managerial revolution? Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  2. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Education International, AEI. (2002). Market information by country: Indonesia. www.aei.dest.gov.au. Accessed 5 Mar 2003.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee, AVCC. (2003). Key statistics on higher education: Internationalization. Canberra: AVCC. www.avcc.edu.au/policies_activities/resource_analysis/key_stats/index.htm. Accessed 6 June 2004.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society, 2nd Edition, Volume I of The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Commonwealth Budget Papers, CBP. (2003). Australian government. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Employment, Education and Training, DEEWR. (2010). Selected Higher Education Statistics. http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Publications/HEStatistics/Publications/Pages/Home.aspx. Accessed 25 Jan 2010.
  8. Deem, R. (2001). Globalization, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative Education, 37(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. National Science Board, NSB. (2010). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington: National Science Foundation (NSB 10-01).Google Scholar
  12. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD. (2003a). Education at a glance. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  13. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD. (2003b). Education and Training, OECD. Stat Extracts. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx. Accessed 10 June 2011.
  14. Robison, R. (2002). What sort of democracy? Predatory and neo-liberal agendas in Indonesia. In C. Kinnvall & K. Jonsson (Eds.), Globalization and democratization in Asia: The construction of identity. (pp. 92–113). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Graduate School of Education, SJTUGSE. (2010). Academic Ranking of World Universities. http://www.arwu.org. Accessed 25 Jan 2010.
  17. United Nations Development Plan, UNDP. (2003). United Nations Development Plan data on national living standards. http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2001/en/pdf/back.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2005.
  18. Universitas Indonesia, UI. (2001). Universitas Indonesia: Gate to global knowledge. Booklet. Jakarta: UI.Google Scholar
  19. World Bank. (2003a). World Bank data and statistics. www.worldbank.org/data/countrydata/countrydata.html. Accessed 6 June 2004.Google Scholar
  20. World Bank. (2003b). Implementation completion report on a loan in the amount of US $65 million to the Government of Indonesia for a higher education support project. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Higher EducationUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.International Education Research CentreCentral Queensland UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations