Advertisement

Methodologies, Tools and Languages for Ontology Design

  • Núria Casellas
Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 3)

Abstract

How do we build an ontology? This chapter offers a review of some of the most important ontology development methodologies, tools and languages, and suggests an expert-based approach to the development of professional knowledge-based legal ontologies.

Keywords

Knowledge Acquisition Ontology Development Ontology Language Ontology Engineering Ontology Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Al-Debei, M. M., and G. Fitzgerald. 2009. OntoEng: A design method for ontology engineering in information systems. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on “Ontology-Driven Software Engineering”, ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA), October 2009, Florida.Google Scholar
  2. Allemang, D., and J. Hendler. 2008. Semantic Web for the working ontologist. Modeling in RDF, RDFS and OWL. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  3. Baayen, R. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bach, D., R. Meersman, P. Spyns, and D. Trog. 2010. Mapping OWL-DL into orm/ridl. In On the move to meaningful internet systems 2007: OTM 2007 Workshops, ed. R. Meersman, Z. Tari, and P. Herrero. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 4805, 742–751. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Baer, P. D., K. Kerremans, and R. Temmerman. 2006. The termontography workbench: A protégé-based tool for the compilation of multilingual terminological resources. In Proceedings of the 9th International Protégé Conference (Poster and Demo Session), Stanford, July 23–26, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. Baer, P. D., K. Kerremans, and R. Temmerman. 2008. Constructing ontology-underpinned terminological resources. A categorisation framework api. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, Copenhagen, 18–21 August 2008.Google Scholar
  7. Barbagallo, A., A. D. Nicola, and M. Missikoff. 2010. eGovernment ontologies: Social participation in building and evolution. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 0:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernaras, A., I. Laresgoiti, and J. Corera. 1996. Building and reusing ontologies for electrical network applications. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’96), ed. W. Wahlster, 298–302. Budapest, Hungary: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Berners-Lee, T., J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. 2001, May. The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5):34–43.Google Scholar
  10. Blythin, S., M. Rouncefield, and J.A. Hughes. 1997. Never mind the ethno’ stuff, what does all this mean and what do we do now: ethnography in the commercial world. Interactions 4(3):38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brank, J., M. Grobelnik, and D. Mladenic. 2005. D.1.6.1 ontology evaluation. SEKT IST-2003-506826 Deliverable 1.6.1, SEKT, EU-IST Project Jozef Stefan Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Buitelaar, P., P. Cimiano, and B. Magnini. 2005b, July. Ontology learning from text: An overview. In Ontology learning from text: Methods, evaluation and applications, ed. P. Buitelaar, P. Cimiano, and B. Magnini, Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications series, Vol. 123, 3–12. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  13. Buitelaar, P., D. Olejnik, and M. Sintek. 2004. A protégé plug-in for ontology extraction from text based on linguistic analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS), Heraklion, May.Google Scholar
  14. Cimiano, P., J. Völker, and R. Studer. 2006. Ontologies on demand? a description of the state-of-the-art, applications, challenges and trends for ontology learning from text. Information Wissenschaft und Praxis 57(6–7):315–320.Google Scholar
  15. Connolly, D., F. van Harmelen, I. Horrocks, D. L. Mcguinness, L. A., and Stein. 2001, December. Daml+oil (march 2001) reference description. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).Google Scholar
  16. Corcho, O., M. Fernández-López, and A. Gómez-Pérez. 2003. Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: Where is their meeting point? Data and Knowledge Engineering 46(1):41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cunningham, H., D. Maynard, K. Bontcheva, and V. Tablan. 2002, July. GATE: A framework and graphical development environment for robust NLP tools and applications. In Proceedings of the 40th Anniversary Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’02), Philadelphia, 168–175.Google Scholar
  18. de Nicola, A., M. Missikoff, and R. Navigli. 2005. A proposal for a unified process for ontology building: UPON. In Database and expert systems applications (DEXA), ed. K. V. Andersen, J. K. Debenham, and R. Wagner, Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 3588, 655–664. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. de Nicola, A., M. Missikoff, and R. Navigli. 2009. A software engineering approach to ontology building. Information Systems 34:258–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dean, M., G. Schreiber, S. Bechhofer, F. van Harmelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and L. A. Stein. 2004, February. OWL web ontology language reference. W3c recommendation 10 February 2004, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/
  21. Dellschaft, K., H. Engelbrecht, J. Barreto, S. Rutenbeck, and S. Staab. 2008. Cicero: Tracking design rationale in collaborative ontology engineering. In The Semantic Web: Research and applications, ed. S. Bechhofer, M. Hauswirth, J. Hoffmann, and M. Koubarakis. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 5021, 782–786. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Denny, M. 2004, July. Ontology tools survey, revisited. Published on XML.comGoogle Scholar
  23. Devedzić, V. 2002. Understanding ontological engineering. Communication of the ACM 45(4): 136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farquhar, A., R. Fikes, and J. Rice. 1997. Tools for assembling modular ontologies in Ontolingua. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Ninth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, AAAI 97, IAAI 97, 27–31 July, 1997, Providence, Rhode Island. Vol. 14, 436–441. Wiley: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fortuna, B., M. Grobelnik, and D. Mladenic. 2007. OntoGen: Semi-automatic ontology editor. In Proceedings of Human Interface and the Management of Information. Interacting in Information Environments, Symposium on Human Interface 2007, Held as Part of HCI International 2007, Beijing, China, July 22–27, ed. M. J. Smith and G. Salvendy, Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 4558, 309–318. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Gangemi, A., G. Steve, and F. Giacomellli. 1996. ONIONS: An ontological methodology for taxonomic knowledge integration. In Proceedings of the ECAI-96 Workshop on Ontological Engineering, Budapest, 13 August, 1996.Google Scholar
  27. Geentjens, S., T. Rita, and P. K. en De Baer. 2006. Sociocognitive terminology and termontography. In Proceedings of the Journées d’Etudes sur le Traitement Automatique de la Langue Arabe, Rabat, 138–151.Google Scholar
  28. Gries, S. T. 2009. Quantitative corpus linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gruber, T. R. 1992. Ontolingua: A mechanism to support portable ontologies. Technical report, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  30. Guarino, N., and C. Welty. 2002. Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM 45(2):61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haase, P., S. Rudolph, Y. Wang, S. Brockmans, R. Palma, J. Euzenat, and M. d’Aquin. 2006, November. Networked ontology model. Deliverable D1.1.1, NeOn Project, http://www.neon-project.org
  32. Hartmann, J., P. Spyns, A. Gibboin, D. Maynard, R. Cuel, M. C. Suárez-Figueroa, and Y. Sure. 2005, January. D.1.2.3. methods for ontology evaluation. Deliverable IST-2004-507482 KWEB D.1.2.3., EU-IST Network of Excellence (NoE) Knowledge Web Consortium.Google Scholar
  33. Hoekstra, R. 2009b. Ontology representation. Design patterns and ontologies that make sense. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, Vol. 197. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  34. IEEE. 1998, December. Ieee standard for a software quality metrics methodology. IEEE Standard 1061-1998. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
  35. IEEE. 2004. Ieee standard for software verification and validation. IEEE Standard 1012-2004. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
  36. IEEE. 2006, January. Ieee standard for developing a software project life cycle process. IEEE Standard 1074-2006. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
  37. Jarrar, M. 2005, May. Towards methodological principles for ontology engineering. Doctor of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
  38. Jarrar, M., M. Keet, and P. Dongilli. 2006, February. Multilingual verbalization of orm conceptual models and axiomatized ontologies. Starlab technical report, STARLab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
  39. Jarrar, M., and R. Meersman. 2002. Formal ontology engineering in the DOGMA approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ontologies, Databases and Applications of Semantics (ODBase 2002), ed. R. Meersman and Z. Tari. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 2519, 1238–1254. Berlin/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Jarrar, M., and R. Meersman. 2007. Ontology engineering – the DOGMA approach. In Advances in web semantic, A state-of-the Art Semantic Web advances in web semantics IFIP2.12., Vol. 1, Chapter 3. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-sbm.Google Scholar
  41. Kerremans, K., P. D. Baer, and R. Temmerman. 2007. Dealing with terminological variation in termontography: Examples from the PoCeHRMOM project. In Proceedings of the LSP 2007 Conference, August 27–31, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  42. Kerremans, K., R. Temmerman, and J. Tummers. 2003. Representing multilingual and culture-specific knowledge in a vat regulatory ontology: Support from the termontography methodology. In OTM 2003 Workshops, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies and the Modeling of Complaint Regulations, ed. R. Meersman and Z. Tari. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 2889, 662–674. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Kotis, K. 2004, December. Ontology engineering: Tools and methodologies for constructing and managing ontologies. Invited talk at the University of the Aegean, Department of I.C.S. Engineering.Google Scholar
  44. Kotis, K. 2010. On supporting HCOME-3o ontology argumentation using semantic wiki technology. In On the move to meaningful internet systems: OTM 2008 Workshops, ed. R. Meersman, Z. Tari, and P. Herrero. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 5333, 193–199. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Kotis, K., and A. Vouros. 2006, July. Human-centered ontology engineering: The HCOME methodology. Knowledge and Information Systems 10(1):109–131.Google Scholar
  46. Kotis, K., G. A. Vouros, and J. P. Alonso. 2005, August. HCOME: A tool-supported methodology for engineering living ontologies. In Semantic web and databases. Second International Workshop – SWDB 2004, ed. C. Bussler, V. Tannen, and I. Fundulaki. LNCS, Vol. 3372, 155–166. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Kozaki, K., E. Sunagawa, Y. Kitamura, and R. Mizoguchi. 2005. Hozo: An ontology development environment – treatment of “role concept” and dependency management – . In Proceedings of Posters and Demos of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2005), PID-79, Galway, November 6–10.Google Scholar
  48. Kumazawa, T., O. Saito, K. Kozaki, T. Matsui, and R. Mizoguchi. 2009. Toward knowledge structuring of sustainability science based on ontology engineering. In Proceedings of International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, 2009 (CISIS ’09), ed. L. Barolli, F. Xhafa, and H.-H. Hsu, 1138–1143. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer SocietyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leenheer, P. D., A. de Moor, and R. Meersman. 2007. Context dependency management in ontology engineering: A formal approach. Journal of Data Semantics 8:26–56.Google Scholar
  50. Lenat, D. B., and R. V. Guha. 1990. Building large knowledge-based systems: Representation and inference in the CYC project. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  51. Lenci, A., S. Montemagni, V. Pirrelli, and G. Venturi. 2007. Nlp-based ontology learning from legal texts. A case study. In LOAIT, ed. P. Casanovas, M. A. Biasiotti, E. Francesconi, and M.-T. Sagri. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 321, 113–129. CEUR-WS.orgGoogle Scholar
  52. Li, Y., K. Bontcheva, and H. Cunningham. 2005. SVM based learning system for information extraction. In Deterministic and statistical methods in machine learning, ed. M. N. J. Winkler and N. Lawerence. LNAI, Vol. 3635, 319–339. Berlin/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Lowe, W. 2006. Yoshikoder: An open source multilingual content analysis tool for social scientists. In American political science association annual meeting, Philadelphia, August 31–September 3. Washington: APSAGoogle Scholar
  54. Maedche, A., and S. Staab. 2001. Ontology learning for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2):72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maedche, A., and S. Staab. 2004. Ontology learning. In Handbook on ontologies. International handbooks on information systems, 173–190. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Marcus, S. L. 1999. Knowledge acquisition. In The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, ed. R. A. Wilson and F. C. Keil, 428–430. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. McGuinness, D. L., R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. 2000. The chimaera ontology environment. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000), Austin, July 30–August 3.Google Scholar
  58. McGuinness, D. L., and F. van Harmelen. 2003, March. OWL web ontology language: Overview. W3c recommendation 10 February 2004, World Wide Web Consortium.Google Scholar
  59. Milton, N. 2007. Knowledge acquisition in practice. A step-by-step guide. Decision engineering. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Missikof, M., R. Navigli, and P. Velardi. 2002, November. Integrated approach to web ontology learning and engineering. Computer 35(11):54–57.Google Scholar
  61. Musen, M. A. 1993. An overview of knowledge acquisition. In Second generation expert systems. ed. J.-M. David, J.-P. Krivine, and R. Simmons, 405–427. Berlin: Springer-Verlag New York. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=167940&CFID=31371873&CFTOKEN=85315380
  62. Navigli, R., and P. Velardi. 2004. Learning domain ontologies from document warehouses and dedicated web sites. Computational Linguistics 30(2):151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Navigli, R., P. Velardi, A. Cucchiarelli, and F. Neri. 2004. Automatic ontology learning: Supporting a per-concept evaluation by domain experts. In Proceedings of the ECAI-2004 Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, Sevilla.Google Scholar
  64. Nielsen, J. 1994a. Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  65. Noy, N. F., and D. L. McGuinness. 2001. Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Technical Report SMI-2001-0880, Stanford University School of Medicine.Google Scholar
  66. Perakath, B., C. P. Menzel, R. J. Mayer, F. Fillion, M. T. Futrell, P. S. DeWitte, and M. Lingineni. 1994, October. Ontology capture method (IDEF5). Interim technical rept. mar 92-sep 94, Knowledge Based Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
  67. Pinto, H. S., C. Tempich, and S. Staab. 2004. DILIGENT: Towards a fine-grained methodology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving engineering of ontologies. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2004), August 22–27 Valencia, ed. R. L. de Mantaras and L. Saitta, 393–397. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  68. Reinert, M. 2003. Le rôle de la répétition dans la représentation de sens et son approche statistique par la méthode alceste. Semiotica 147(164):389–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schreiber, G., H. Akkermans, A. Anjewierden, R. de Hoog, N. Shadbolt, W. V. de Velde, and B. Wielinga. 1999. Knowledge engineering and management. The commonKADS methodology. Cambridge: A Bradford Book. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Sclano, F., and P. Velardi. 2007. Termextractor: A web application to learn the common terminology of interest groups and research communities. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Terminology and Artificial Intelligence (TIA’07), Sophia Antinopolis, October.Google Scholar
  71. Segaran, T., C. Evans, and J. Taylor. 2009. Programming the Semantic Web. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  72. Shin, I., T. Kawamura, H. Nakagawa, K. Nakayama, Y. Tahara, and A. Ohsuga. 2009. Ontomo: Development of ontology building service. In Principles of practice in multi-agent systems, ed. J.-J. Yang, M. Yokoo, T. Ito, Z. Jin, and P. Scerri. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 5925, 143–158. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  73. Smith, M. K., C. Welty, and D. L. McGuinness. 2004, February. OWL ontology web language guide. Recomendation, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).Google Scholar
  74. Spyns, P., and A. Lisovoy. 2003, July. The DOGMA modeller manual. EuroLan 2003 tutorial material STAR-2003-11, STAR Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
  75. Spyns, P., R. Meersman, and M. Jarrar. 2002. Data modelling versus ontology engineering. ACM SIGMOD Record 31(4):12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spyns, P., Y. Tang, and R. Meersman. 2008. An ontology engineering methodology for DOGMA. Applied Ontology 3(1–2):13–39.Google Scholar
  77. Standard, I. 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (vdts) – part 11: Guidance on usability. ISO Standard 9241-11:1998, International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  78. Standard, I. 1999a. Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. ISO Standard 13407:1999, International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  79. Standard, I. 1999b. Information technology – measurement and rating of performance of computer-based software systems. ISO Standard 14756:1999, ISO/IEC.Google Scholar
  80. Standard, I. 1999c. Information technology – software product evaluation – part 1: General overview. ISO Standard 14598-1:1999, ISO/IEC.Google Scholar
  81. Standard, I. 2002. Ergonomics of human-system interaction – usability methods supporting human-centred design. ISO Standard TR 16982:2002, International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  82. Standard, I. 2004a. Information technology – process assessment – part 1: Concepts and vocabulary. ISO Standard 15504-1:2004, ISO/IEC.Google Scholar
  83. Standard, I. 2004b. Software and system engineering – guidelines for the design and preparation of user documentation for application software. ISO Standard 18019:2004, ISO/IEC.Google Scholar
  84. Standard, I. 2005. Software engineering – software product quality requirements and evaluation (square) – guide to square. ISO Standard 25000:2005, ISO/IEC.Google Scholar
  85. Standard, I. 2006b. Software engineering – software life cycle processes – maintenance. ISO Standard 14764:2006, ISO/IEC.Google Scholar
  86. Standard, I. 2006c. Systems and software engineering – content of systems and software life cycle process information products (documentation). ISO/IEC 13407:1999, International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  87. Standard, I. 2008a. Systems and software engineering – software life cycle processes. ISO Standard 12207:2008, ISO/IEC.Google Scholar
  88. Standard, I. 2008b. Systems and software engineering – system life cycle processes. ISO Standard 15288:2008, ISO/IEC.Google Scholar
  89. Steels, L. 1990. Components of expertise. AI Magazine 11(2):28–49.Google Scholar
  90. Steve, G., A. Gangemi, and D. Pisanelli. 1997. Integrating medical terminologies with ONIONS methodology. In Information modelling and knowledge bases VIII, ed. H. Kangassalo and J. Charrel, Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  91. Sugiura, N., N. Izumi, and T. Yamaguchi. 2004. A support environment for domain ontology development with general ontologies and text corpus. IEEE Intelligent Informatics Bulletin 3(1):25–30.Google Scholar
  92. Sure, Y. 2003. Methodology, tools and case studies for ontology based knowledge management. Ph.D. thesis, Fakultät für Wirschaftwissenschaften der Universität Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  93. Sure, Y., S. Staab, and R. Studer. 2002. Methodology for development and employment of ontology based knowledge management applications. ACM SIGMOD Record 31(Special Issue)(4):18–23.Google Scholar
  94. Sure, Y., S. Staab, and R. Studer. 2004. On-To-Knowledge methodology (OTKM). In Handbook on ontologies, ed. S. Staab and R. Studer. International handbooks on information systems, 117–132. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  95. Sure, Y., and R. Studer. 2002, September. On-To-Knowledge methodology – final version. Project Deliverable D. 18, EU IST-1999-10132 On-To-Knowledge (Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe).Google Scholar
  96. Sure, Y., and R. Studer. 2003. A methodology for ontology-based knowledge management. In Towards the Semantic Web. Ontology-driven knowledge management, ed. J. Davies, D. Fensel, and F. van Harmelen, 33–46. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  97. Temmerman, R., and K. Kerremans. 2003. Termontography: Ontology building and the sociocognitive approach to terminology description. In Proceedings of CIL17, MFF UK (CD-ROM), ed. E. Hajicová, A. Kotes̆ovcová, and J. Mírovský. Prague: Matfyz Press.Google Scholar
  98. Trog, D., Y. Tang, and R. Meersman. 2007. Towards ontological commitments with omega-ridl markup language. In Advances in rule interchange and applications, ed. A. Paschke and Y. Biletskiy. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 4824, 92–106. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  99. Tudorache, T., N. Noy, S. Tu, and M. Musen. 2010. Supporting collaborative ontology development in protégé. In The Semantic Web – ISWC 2008, ed, A. Sheth, S. Staab, M. Dean, M. Paolucci, D. Maynard, T. Finin, and K. Thirunarayan. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 5318, 17–32. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  100. Uschold, M. 1996, September. Building ontologies: Towards a unified methodology. In Technical Report AIAI-TR-197, and in Proceedings of Expert Systems 1996, the 16th Annual Conference of the British Computer Society Specialist Group on Expert Systems. Cambridge: The University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  101. Uschold, M., and M. King. 1995. Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing at IJCAI’95, ed. D. Skuce, Montreal.Google Scholar
  102. van Kralingen, R. W., P. R. Visser, T. J. Bench-Capon, and H. J. V. D. Herik. 1999. A principled approach to developing legal knowledge systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies51(6):1127–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Vega, J. C. A. 2003, December. WebODE User’s Manual (Draft version 0.1 ed.). Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence, School of Computer Science, Technical University of Madrid (UPM). http://www.oeg-upm.net/
  104. Velardi, P., R. Navigli, A. Cucchiarelli, and F. Neri. 2005, July. Evaluation of OntoLearn, a methodology for automatic population of domain ontologies. In Ontology learning from text: Methods, evaluation and applications, ed. P. Buitelaar, P. Cimiano, and B. Magnini. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications series, Vol. 123. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  105. Visser, P. R. 1998. Implicit assumptions in legal knowledge systems. In Proceedings of the 13th BILETA Conference: The Changing Jurisdiction, Trinity College, Dublin March, 27th–28th, Dublin. BILETA, British and Irish Legal Education Technology Association.Google Scholar
  106. Visser, P. R. S., R. W. van Kralingen, and T. J. M. Bench-Capon. 1997. A method for the development of legal knowledge systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL’97), ed. J. Zeleznikow, D. Hunter, and L. K. Branting, Melbourne, 151–160. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  107. Yehia-Dahab, M., H. A. Hasan, and A. Rafea. 2008. TextOntoEx: Automatic ontology construction from natural English text. Expert Systems with Applications 34:1474–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zablith, F. 2009. Evolva: A comprehensive approach to ontology evolution. In The Semantic Web: Research and applications, ed. L. Aroyo, P. Traverso, F. Ciravegna, P. Cimiano, T. Heath, E. Hyvönen, R. Mizoguchi, E. Oren, M. Sabou, and E. Simperl. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 5554, 944–948. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  109. Zhao, G., and R. Leary. 2005a, August. AKEM: An ontology engineering methodology in ff poirot. Deliverable of The FFPOIROT IP project (IST-2001-38248) Deliverable D6.8 (WP 6), STARLab VUB.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Law and TechnologyUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain

Personalised recommendations