Advertisement

Probability of Capsizing in Beam Seas with Piecewise Linear Stochastic GZ Curve

  • Vadim Belenky
  • Arthur M. Reed
  • Kenneth M. Weems
Chapter
Part of the Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (FMIA, volume 97)

Abstract

The probability of capsizing for a dynamical system with time-varying piecewise linear stiffness is presented. The simplest case is considered, in which only the angle of the maximum of the restoring curve is changing. These changes are assumed to be dependent on wave excitation; such a system can be considered as a primitive model of a ship in beam seas, where all changes in stability are caused by heave motions. A split-time approach is used, in which capsizing is considered as a sequence of two random events: upcrossing through a certain threshold (non14 rare problem) and capsizing after upcrossing (rare problem). To reflect the time15 varying stability, a critical roll rate is introduced as a stochastic process defined at any instant of time. Capsizing is then associated with an upcrossing when the instantaneous roll rate exceeds the critical roll rate defined for the instant of upcrossing. A self-consistency check of the method, in which a statistical frequency of capsizing was obtained by time-domain evaluation of the response of the piecewise linear dynamical system and favorably compared with the theoretical prediction is described.

Keywords

Piecewise Linear Roll Angle Roll Motion Calm Water Roll Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold L (1998) Random dynamical systems. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bassler CC, Dipper MJ, Lang GE (2009) Formation of large-amplitude wave groups in an experimental model basin. Proc 10th Int Conf on Stab of Ships and Ocean Veh, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck RF, Reed AM (2001). Modern computational methods for ships in seaway. Trans SNAME, 109: 1-48.Google Scholar
  4. Belenky VL (1993) A capsizing probability computation method. J Ship Res 37:200- 207Google Scholar
  5. Belenky VL Weems K M, Lin W M (2008) Numerical procedure for evaluation of capsizing probability with split time method. Proc. 27th Symp. Nav Hydrodyn, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  6. Gumbel E (1962) Statistics of extremes, Colombia Univ Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Guckenheimer J, Holmes, P. (1983). Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical system and bifurcation of vector fields, Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Paroka D, Okura Y, Umeda N (2006) Analytical prediction of capsizing probability of a ship in beam wind and waves. J Ship Res, 50 2:187-195Google Scholar
  9. Paroka D, Umeda N (2006) Capsizing probability prediction of the large passenger ship in irregular beam wind and waves: comparison of analytical and numerical methods. J Ship Res 50 4:371-377Google Scholar
  10. Roberts JB, Spanos P (2003) Random vibration and statistical linearization. Dover PublGoogle Scholar
  11. Themelis N, Spyrou K J (2007) Probabilistic assessment of ship stability. Trans SNAME 115Google Scholar
  12. Umeda N, Shuto M, Maki A (2007), Theoretical prediction of broaching probability for a ship in irregular astern seas. Proc. 9th Int. Ship Stab Workshop, Germanischer Lloyd, HamburgGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vadim Belenky
    • 1
  • Arthur M. Reed
    • 1
  • Kenneth M. Weems
    • 2
  1. 1.Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division (NSWCCD) - David Taylor Model BasinWest BethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Science Application International Corporation (SAIC)BowieUSA

Personalised recommendations