Advertisement

Learning Insularity: Social Capital, Social Learning and Staying at Home Among European Youth

  • David Cairns
  • Katarzyna Growiec
Chapter

Abstract

Rather than explore how young people acquire mobility predispositions, this chapter discusses how European youth learn not to be mobile. Using the results of original research conducted in Northern Ireland and Portugal, we focus upon two specific mobility themes, housing transitions and migration intentions, and examine the relationship between the two. We found that almost three quarters of young people in both samples were living in the parental home, with a significant correlation between residing at home and not wanting to be trans-nationally in the future. While economic factors can be important in mobility decision-making, social capital generated by social ties with family members was more influential in the present context. We conclude that an informal social learning process has taken place in the parental home, leading many young people to learn to be geographically insular.

Keywords

Young People Social Capital Social Learning Parental Home Housing Transition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aassve, A., Billari, F. C., Mazzuco, S., & Ongaro, F. (2002). Leaving home: A comparative analysis of ECHP data. Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 259–275.Google Scholar
  2. Akers, R. L. (1990). Rational choice, deterrence, and social learning theory in criminology: The path not taken. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 81(3), 653–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning theory and deviant behavior: A specific test of general theory. American Sociological Review, 44, 636–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. F., & Kras, K. (2005). Revisiting Albert Bandura’s social learning theory to better understand and assist victims of intimate personal violence. Women & Criminal Justice, 17(1), 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arneil, B. (2006). Diverse communities: The problem with social capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avery, R., Goldscheider, F., & Speare, A., Jr. (1992). Feathered nest/gilded cage: The effects of parental resources on young adults’ leaving home. Demography, 29(3), 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Bendit, R., Gaiser, W., & Marbach, J. (1999). Youth and housing in Germany and the European Union: Data trends on housing: Biographical, social and political aspects. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.Google Scholar
  9. Beugelsdijk, S., & Smulders, J. A. (2003). Bridging and bonding social capital: Which type is good for growth? In W. Arts, J. Hagenaars, & L. Halman (Eds.), The cultural diversity of European unity: Findings, explanations and reflections from the European values study (pp. 147–185). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill N.V.Google Scholar
  10. Biggart, A., & Cairns, D. (2004). Families and transitions in Europe: Comparative report. Coleraine: University of Ulster.Google Scholar
  11. Biggart, A., Bendit, R., Cairns, D., Hein, K., & Mørch, S. (2004). Families and transitions in Europe—state of the art. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  12. Billari, F. C., Philipov, D., & Baizán, P. (2001). Leaving home in Europe: The experience of cohorts born around 1960. International Journal of Population Geography, 7, 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boswell, C. (2008). Combining economics and sociology in migration theory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(4), 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory for research in the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  16. Buck, N., & Scott, J. (1993). She’s leaving home: But why? An analysis of young people leaving the parental home. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(4), 863–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burt, R. S. (1995). Structural holes: The social structure and competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cairns, D. (2008). Moving in transition: An exploration of Northern Ireland youth and geographical mobility. Young, 16(3), 227–249. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cairns, D. (2009). The wrong Portuguese? Youth and geographical mobility intentions in Portugal. In H. Fassman, M. Haller, & D. Lane (Eds.), Migration and mobility in Europe: Trends, patterns and control (pp. 103–114). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. Cairns, D., & Growiec, K. (2008). I always need my mum: Social capital and student housing transitions in Northern Ireland. Unpublished conference paper, BSA Youth Study Group/University of Teesside Youth Research Group: Young people, place and class, September 2008.Google Scholar
  21. Cairns, D., & Menz, S. (2007). Youth on the move? Exploring youth migrations in Eastern Germany and Northern Ireland. In T. Geisen & C. Reigel (Eds.), Youth and migration. Frankfurt: IKO-Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Cairns, D., & Smyth, J. (2011). I don’t know about living abroad: Exploring student mobility and immobility in Northern Ireland. International Migration, 49(2), 135–161.Google Scholar
  23. Cherlin, A. J., Scabini, E., & Rossi, G. (1997). Still in the nest: Delayed home leaving in Europe and the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 572–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Christie, H., Munro, M., & Rettig, H. (2002). Accommodating students. Journal of Youth Studies, 5(2), 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(supplement), 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. European Commission. (2001). European Commission White Paper. A New Impetus for Youth. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  27. European Observatory on the Social Situation. (2006). Demographic trends, socio-economic impacts and policy implications in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  28. European Values Survey. (2006).European values survey 1999/2000. http://zacat.gesis.org/webview/index.jsp. Accessed Nov 2009.Google Scholar
  29. Findlay, A., King, R., Stam, A., & Ruiz-Gellices, E. (2006). Ever reluctant Europeans: The changing geographies of UK students studying and working abroad. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13(4), 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ford, J., Rugg, J., & Burrows, R. (2002). Conceptualising the contemporary role of housing in the transition to adult life in England. Urban Studies, 39(13), 2455–2467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fouarge, D., & Ester, P. (2007). Factors determining international and regional migration in Europe. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  32. Galland, O. (1997). Leaving home and family relations in France. Journal of Family Issues, 18(6), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  34. Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organising: Building social capital as a development strategy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haj-Yahia, M. M., & Dawud-Noursi, S. (1998). Predicting the use of different conflict tactics among Arab siblings in Israel: A study based on social learning theory. Journal of Family Violence, 13(1), 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hogben, M., & Byrne, D. (1998). Using social learning theory to explain individual differences in human sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holdsworth, C. (2005). When are the children going to leave home! Family culture and delayed transitions in Spain. European Societies, 7(4), 547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holdsworth, C. (2006). Don’t you think you’re missing out, living at home? Student experiences and residential transitions. Sociological Review, 54(3), 495–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holland, J., Reynolds, T., & Weller, S. (2007). Transitions, networks and communities: The significance of social capital in the lives of children and young people. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(1), 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Iacovou, M. (2001). Leaving home in the European Union. Working papers of the Institute for Social and Economic Research 2001–18. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
  42. Iacovou, M. (2002). Regional differences in the transition to adulthood. Annals of the American Academy, 580, 40–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jones, G. (1995). Leaving Home. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jones, G., & Wallace, C. (1992). Youth, family and citizenship. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nave-Herz, R. (1997). Still in the nest: The family and young adults in Germany. Journal of Family Issues, 18(6), 671–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Niaura, R. (2000). Cognitive social learning and related perspectives on drug craving. Addiction, 95(1), 155–163.Google Scholar
  48. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alon: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  50. Raffo, C., & Reeves, M. (2000). Youth transitions and social exclusion: Developments in social capital theory. Journal of Youth Studies, 3(2), 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Röper, A., Völker, B., & Flap, H. (2009). Social networks and getting a home: Do contacts matter? Social Networks, 31(1), 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rusconi, A. (2004). Different pathways out of the parental home: A comparison of West Germany and Italy. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35(4), 627–649.Google Scholar
  53. Santoro, M. (2005). Living with parents: A research study on Italian young people and their mothers. In C. Leccardi & E. Ruspini (Eds.), A new youth? Young people, generations and family life. Ashgate: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  54. Seaman, P., & Sweeting, H. (2004). Assisting young people’s access to social capital in contemporary families: A qualitative study. Journal of Youth Studies, 7(2), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sgritta, G. (2001). Family and welfare systems in the transition to adulthood: An emblematic case study. Working papers of the Institute for Social and Economic Research 2001–18. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
  56. Wallace, C., & Kovatcheva, S. (1998). Youth in society: The construction and destruction of youth in East and West Europe. Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Wofford Mihalic, S., & Elliott, D. (1997). A social learning theory of marital violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12(1), 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 1–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research and Studies in SociologyISCTE-Lisbon University Institute, Edifício ISCTE, Av. das Forças ArmadasLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of PsychologyWarsaw School of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations