Abstract
The debate over the relevance of culture and its potential influence on the learning processes of minority and migrant groups is a long-standing tradition: On the one hand culture is seen as crucial for an understanding of migration and minority issues, while on the other, the focus on culture is seen as a hindrance which leads to processes of ‘culturalization’ and ‘ethnization’ through which social inequalities are made invisible. Most prominent is the high relevance which ‘culture’ is awarded in discussions of the so-called ‘clash of cultures’ thesis (Huntington 1997) or the ‘war of civilizations’ (Tibi 1995), which has been highly influential in social and political debates on migration and minorities, especially after the events of 9/11 in the USA. The relevance of culture for an understanding of migration and minority issues is under review because when critically approached it is shown to support essentializing processes. A call has also been made to instead focus upon ‘cultural’ differences, and to turn our attention towards structures of social inequality (cf. Dittrich and Radtke 1990; Juhasz and Mey 2003). Within this line of research ‘culture’ has been predominantly understood as being less relevant in the social sphere; an impression or result of social inequality but not its cause. Such perspectives promote an understanding of culture from a structuralist perspective, which is also directed against the politics and practices of multiculturalism as established since the late 1970s (Bekerman 2003) in different Western countries such as Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands (cf. Guiberneau and Rex 1999). This critique focuses on the essentializing effects of multiculturalism on so-called cultural groups, which are perceived as fixed and unchangeable. Anne Phillips, in her critic on multiculturalism, recommends avoiding the term ‘culture’ and suggests instead a ‘Multiculturalism without Culture’ (Phillips 2007). “When multiculturalism is represented as the accommodation of or negotiation with cultural communities or groups, this encourages us to view the world through the prism of separate and distinct cultures. (…) The individuals, in all their complexity, disappear from view” (Phillips 2007, p. 179). Instead, Phillips argues for a multiculturalism which does not support processes of reification and homogenization while being able to address cultural inequalities (Phillips 2007, p. 179).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, B. (1993). Die Erfindung der Nation: Zur Karriere eines erfolgreichen Konzepts. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
Bekerman, Z. (2003). Hidden dangers in multicultural discourse. Race Equality and Teaching (formerly MCT-Multicultural Teaching), 21(3), 36–42.
Dittrich, E. J., & Radtke, F.-O. (1990). Ethnizität: Wissenschaft und Minderheiten. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Umverteilung oder Anerkennung? Eine politisch-philosophische Kontroverse. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Geisen, T. (2009). Vergesellschaftung statt Integration: Zur Kritik des Integrations-Paradigmas. In N.N. (Ed.), N.N. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Glick-Schiller, N., Basch, L., & Szanton Blanc, C. (1997). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. In L. Pries (Ed.), Transnationale migration (pp. 121–140). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
Guiberneau, M., & Rex, J. (Eds.). (1999). The ethnicity reader: Nationalism, multiculturalism, and migration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hoerder, D., Hébert, Y., & Schmitt, I. (2005). Transculturation and the accumulation of social capital: Understanding histories and decoding the present of young people. In D. Hoerder, Y. Hébert, & I. Schmitt (Eds.), Negotiating transcultural lives: Belongings and social capital among youth in comparative perspective (pp. 11–38). Göttingen: V & R Unipress.
Honneth, A. (1994). Kampf um Anerkennung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Honneth, A. (2004). Anerkennung als Ideoogie. WestEnd, 1. Jg. (Heft 1), 51–70.
Huntington, S. P. (1997). Kampf der Kulturen: Die Neugestaltung der Weltpolitik im 21. Jahrhundert. München: Europaverlag.
Juhasz, A., & Mey, E. (2003). Die zweite Generation: Etablierte oder Außenseiter? Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Mergner, G. (1999). Lernfähigkeit der Subjekte und gesellschaftliche Anpassungsgewalt. Hamburg: Argument Verlag.
Phillips, A. (2007). Multiculturalism without culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pries, L. (2008). Die Transnationalisierung der sozialen Welt. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Sennett, R. (2004). Respekt im Zeitalter der Ungleichheit. Berlin: Berliner Taschenbuchverlag.
Tibi, B. (1995). Krieg der Zivilisationen: Politik und Religion zwischen Vernunft und Fundamentalismus. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geisen, T., Bekerman, Z. (2012). Migration, Minorities, and Learning—Understanding Cultural and Social Differences in Education. In: Bekerman, Z., Geisen, T. (eds) International Handbook of Migration, Minorities and Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1466-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1466-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1465-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1466-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)