Advertisement

Affect Specificity as Indicators of National Well-Being: Representative Sample of Croatia

  • Zvjezdana Prizmić-Larsen
  • Ljiljana Kaliterna Lipovčan
  • Tihana Brkljačić
Chapter

Abstract

In our survey-based study, we gathered evaluative and experiential measures of well-being and examined their correlates with different life domains variables used as predictors for each well-being measure. Subjects were a representative sample of Croatian citizens (N  =  1,129). Subjects reported life satisfaction and rated how often they felt happy, satisfied, sad, angry, depressive, and stressed over the past month. Predictors variables included measures representing various domains such as physical (health), social (seeing friends, family support, receiving help, trust, fairness), psychological (learning, respect, recognition, spirituality), and job-related variables (job satisfaction, commuting). Hierarchical regression analyses were used with age, gender, and income as covariates. Distinctive predictors of positive emotions were learning and seeing friends, while predictors of negative emotions were trust, fairness, and recognition.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Negative Emotion Positive Emotion Family Support Social Trust 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Böhnke, P. (2008). Does society matter? Life satisfaction in the enlarged Europe. Social Indicators Research, 87, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonini, A. (2008). Cross-national variation in individual life satisfaction: Effects of national wealth, human development, and environmental conditions. Social Indicators Research, 87, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B., & Underwood, L. (2001). Social relationships and health: Challenges for measurement and intervention. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 17, 129–141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup world poll. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 53–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Kesebir, P., & Lucas, R. (2008). Benefits of accounts of well-being— for societies and for psychological science. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harter, J. K., Arora, R., & Neftzger, A. (2008). More Americans struggling than six months ago, those struggling outnumber those thriving for fourth consecutive month. The Gallup Organization. Retrieved from www.gallup.com/poll/109501/More-Americans-Struggling-Than-Six-Months-Ago.aspx
  13. Harter, J. K., & Gurley, V. F. (2008). Measuring well-being in the United States. Observer, 21, 17–20.Google Scholar
  14. Helliwell, J. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: What’s new? The Economic Journal, 116, 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobcraft, J. (2006). The ABC of demographic behaviour: How the interplays of alleles, brains, and contexts over the life course should shape research aimed at understanding population processes. Population Studies, 60, 153–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huppert, F., & Whittington, J. (2003). Evidence for the independence of positive and negative well-being: Implications for quality of life assessment. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 107–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. The American Economic Review, 94, 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, 312, 1908–1910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaliterna Lipovčan, L., & Prizmić-Larsen, Z. (2006a). What makes Croats happy? Predictors of happiness in representative sample. In A. Delle Fave (Ed.), Dimensions of well-being: Research and intervention (pp. 53–59). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  21. Kaliterna Lipovčan, L., & Prizmić-Larsen, Z. (2006b). Quality of life, life satisfaction and happiness in Croatia in comparison to European countries. In K. Otti (Ed.), Croatia’s accession to the European Union: The challenges of Participation (pp. 189–208). Zagreb, Croatia: Institute for Public Finances.Google Scholar
  22. Kaliterna Lipovčan, L., & Prizmić-Larsen, Z. (2007). Importance and satisfaction with life domains in Croatia: Representative sample. In R. J. Estes (Ed.), Advancing quality of life in a turbulent world (pp. 41–51). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Keyes, C., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuppens, P., Realo, A., & Diener, E. (2008). The role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 66–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lelkes, O. (2006). Knowing what is good for you: Empirical analysis of personal preferences and the ‘objective good’. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lucas, R., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2006). The etiology of gender differences in depression. In C. M. Mazure & G. P. Keita (Eds.), Understanding depression in women: Applying empirical research to practice and policy (pp. 9–43). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oishi, S., Diener, E., Lucas, R., & Suh, E. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 980–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 603–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Selim, S. (2008). Life satisfaction and happiness in Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 88, 531–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zvjezdana Prizmić-Larsen
    • 1
  • Ljiljana Kaliterna Lipovčan
    • 2
  • Tihana Brkljačić
    • 2
  1. 1.Washington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Social Sciences Ivo PilarZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations