Advertisement

On a Contribution of Wild-Land Fires on Atmospheric Composition in Arid Regions

  • Joana Soares
  • Janne Hakkarainen
  • Tatjana Ermakova
  • Mikhail Sofiev
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

The study presents the Fire Assimilation System (FAS) based on Level MODIS Collection 5 Active Fire Products. The FAS estimates the emission fluxes originated from the wild-land fires and provides this information to the atmospheric composition modelling system SILAM. Presently, the FAS incorporates the emission factors for three main land-use types (grass and agriculture, forest and mixed), which values were verified for several European episodes. Current work is a part of the FAS calibration for totally different geographical regions, Portugal and Australia, which nonetheless have several common environmental features.

Keywords

Severe Fire Emission Flux Fire Source Fire Season PM10 Daily Concentration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study has been funded by the Academy of Finland, project IS4FIRES.

References

  1. 1.
    Andreae MO, Merlet P (2001) Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 15:955–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blake NJ, Blake NJ, Blake DR, Wingenter OW, Sive BS, Kang CH, Thornton DC, Bandy AR, Atlas E, Flocke F, Harris JM, Rowland FS (1999) Aircraft measurements of the latitudinal, vertical, and seasonal variations of NMHCs, methyl nitrate, methyl halides, and DMS during the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1). J Geophys Res 104(D17):21, 803–821Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dirksen RJ, Boersma KF, de Laat J, Stammes P, van der Werf GR, Val Martin M, Kelder HM (2009) An aerosol boomerang: rapid around-the-world transport of smoke from the December 2006 Australian forest fires observed from space. J Geophys Res 114, D21201Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sofiev M, Siljamo P, Valkama I, Ilvonen M, Kukkonen J (2006) A dispersion modeling system SILAM and its evaluation against ETEX data. Atmos Environ 40:674–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sofiev M, Galperin M, Genikhovich E (2008) Construction and evaluation of Eulerian dynamic core for the air quality and emergency modeling system SILAM. NATO Science for piece and security serties C: Environmental security. Air pollution modelling and its application, XIX, Borrego C, Miranda AI (eds), Springer, pp 699–701Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sofiev M, Vankevich R, Lotjonen M, Prank M, Petukhov V, Ermakova T, Koskinen J, Kukkonen J (2009) An operational system for the assimilation of the satellite information on wild-land fires for the needs of air quality modelling and forecasting. Atmos Chem Phys 9:6833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ward DE, Radke LF (1993) Emissions measurements from vegetation fires: a comparative evaluation of methods and results. In: Crutzen P, Goldammer J (eds) Fire in the environment: the ecological, atmospheric, and climate importance of vegetation fires. Dahlem workshop reports, environmental sciences research report 13. Wiley, Chischester, pp 53–76Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joana Soares
    • 1
  • Janne Hakkarainen
    • 1
  • Tatjana Ermakova
    • 2
  • Mikhail Sofiev
    • 1
  1. 1.Finnish Meteorological InstituteHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Russian State Hydrometeorological UniversitySt. PetersburgRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations