Governance and Technology Systems: The Challenge of Emerging Technologies

Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology book series (ELTE, volume 7)

Abstract

Technological change at current scale is not a series of isolated events, but a movement towards new, locally stable, earth systems states. These states integrate natural, environmental, cultural, theological, institutional, financial, managerial, technological, built and human dimensions, and change worldviews, and cultural and moral values. While technologies do not define these integrated earth system states, except by convenience, they are an important destabilizing force across society, generating not just new opportunities but also continuing transition costs. Moreover, because technologies create such powerful comparative advantages as between cultures, those cultures that attempt to block technology will, all things equal, eventually be dominated by those that embrace it. The implications of these dynamics, taken together, is that technological evolution will be difficult, if not impossible, to stop or even manage effectively. How to respond ethically, rationally, and responsibly to technological change is, therefore, both a difficult research question and a serious practical challenge to our existing legal and governance institutions.

Keywords

Complex adaptive technology systems Emerging technologies Institutional failure and emerging technologies Railroads 

References

  1. Allenby, B.R. 2005. Reconstructing earth. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allenby, B.R., and D. Sarewitz. 2011. The Techno-Human Condition. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baer, J., J.C. Kaufman, and R.F. Baumeister. 2008. Are we free: Psychology and free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bijker, W. E., T. P. Hughes, and T. Pinch, eds. 1997. The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boot, M. 2007. War made new. New York, NY: Gotham.Google Scholar
  6. Bruchey, S.W. 1980. Small business in American life. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M. 2000. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, G. 2007. A fairwell to alms: A brief economic history of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cronon, W., ed. 1991. Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  10. De Grey, A.D. N.J. 2004. Strategies for engineered negligible senescence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1019.Google Scholar
  11. Freeman, C., and F. Louca. 2001. As time goes by: From the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Grubler, A. 1998. Technology and global change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hacking, I. 1999. The social construction of what? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hayles, N.K. 1999. How we became posthuman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Heidegger, M. 1977. The question concerning technology and other essays (trans: Lovitt, W.). New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  16. IEEE Spectrum. 2004. Engineering and aging. Spectrum 41 (9): 10, 31–35.Google Scholar
  17. Kurzweil, R. 2005. The singularity is near. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  18. Landes, D.S. 1998. The wealth and poverty of nations. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  19. Marks, P. 2008. Rat-brained robots take their first steps. NewScientist 199 (2669): 22–23.Google Scholar
  20. Marx, L. 1964. The machine in the garden: Technology and the pastoral ideal in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. McNeill, J.R. 2000. Something new under the sun. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  22. Merchant, C. 1995. Reinventing Eden: Western culture as a recovery narrative. In Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature, ed. W. Cronon. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  23. Moravec, H. 1988. Mind children: The future of robot and human intelligence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. National Gallery of Art. 1998. Manet, Monet, and the Gare Saint-Lazare. Exhibition brochure. Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art.Google Scholar
  25. Nye, D.E. 1994. American technological sublime. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Nye, D.E. 2003. America as second creation: Technology and narratives of new beginning. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Physorg. 2008. U.S. Army invests in ‘thought helmet’ technology for voiceless communication. Physorg.com, http://www.physorg.com/printnews.php?newsid=141314439, Accessed 24 Sept 2008.
  28. PSRM (Pacific Southwest Railway Museum). 2008. Railroad history: Important milestones in English and American Railway Development. http://www.sdrm.org/history/timeline. Accessed Oct 2008.
  29. Roco, M.C., and W.S. Bainbridge, eds. 2003. Converging technologies for improving human performance. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Rosenberg, N., and L.E. Birdzell, Jr. 1986. How the west grew rich: The economic transformation of the industrial world. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  31. Schivelbusch, W. 1977. The railway journey: The industrialization of time and space in the 19th century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schumpeter, J.A. 1942 (reissued 2008). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google Scholar
  33. Senge, P.M. 1990. The fifth discipline. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  34. The Economist. 2008. The odd couple: a special report on the Koreas (center Section, 27 September 2008). The Economist. Google Scholar
  35. Vijg, J. and J. Campisi. 2008. Puzzles, promises and a cure for aging. Nature 454: 1065–1071.Google Scholar
  36. WECD (The World Commission on Environment and Development, also known as the Brundtland Commission). 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations