Skip to main content

Belief-Based Preference

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 712 Accesses

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 354))

Abstract

In this chapter, we resume the issue of “entanglement” of preference and information-based notions like knowledge and belief, that we have studied already in Chapter 5. How does this play when preference comes with richer priority structure? To plunge right in, let us consider a variation of Example 7.1: Alice is going to buy a house. For her there are several things to consider: the cost, the quality and the neighborhood, strictly in that order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It would be interesting to consider what more a full doxastic predicate logic language can bring to our preference setting, but we will leave this question to other occasions.

  2. 2.

    Readers who liked our plausibility models for belief in Chapters 4, 5, may also just continue thinking in these terms when reading what we have to say about the doxastic modality .

  3. 3.

    It would be also interesting to look at non-factual priorities containing beliefs of the agents.

  4. 4.

    Superiority is just defined as preference was in Chapter 7.

  5. 5.

    Note that the \(V^{\prime}(p_i)\) are only relevant for the ordering ⊴ because the p i ’s only occur directly under the Pref in \(\varphi(p_1, \dots,p_n).\)

  6. 6.

    In Chapter 10, we will return to the role of structured propositions in priority graphs, showing how their “internal algebra” can be relevant to preference reasoning after all.

References

  1. Garson, J. 2001. Quantification in modal logic. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic, eds. D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, second edition, volume 3, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 267–323.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Halpern, J.Y. 1997. Defining relative likelihood in partially-ordered preferential structure. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 7:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, F. 2009. Diversity of agents and their interaction. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18(1):23–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fenrong Liu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, F. (2011). Belief-Based Preference. In: Reasoning about Preference Dynamics. Synthese Library, vol 354. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1344-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics