Advertisement

Promoting Critical Thinking to High School Students When Teaching About Climate Change Through a Participatory Approach

  • Laura BarrazaEmail author
  • Barbara Bodenhorn
Chapter

Abstract

New paradigms in science education are focused on moving towards a sustainable society, meaning redefining the educational practices and developing new methods in order to establish better relationships among individuals, groups, and the society. Being able to reflect upon developing new pedagogic strategies, that support collective action, is crucial to favour social change. Education in the twenty-first century should be based on critical and social theories of the environment and development, in order to link the prospects for sustainability to new forms of economy, social welfare, governance and education (Barraza et al., Environ Educ Res 9(3):347–357, 2003). The nature of contemporary knowledge and knowledge construction demands increasing collaboration and communication between once isolated disciplines. Curriculum integration can reduce curriculum fragmentation, promoting a better awareness of the way different forms of knowledge work and contribute to collaborative knowledge construction, stimulating a critical and a reflexive perspective in their learners. This chapter will focus on the pedagogic strategies used in a research project aiming to provide potential young scientists from rural communities of Mexico and Alaska with a unique opportunity to learn more about their own local knowledge whilst gaining a better understanding of how it intersects with global processes. The project has helped students make cognitive links between their scientific knowledge and life experience, and has established affective and behavioral links which have intensified the ways in which they value their environment, culture, traditions and communities (Tytler et al. 2010; Bodenhorn, Learning about environmental research in a context of climate change: an international scholastic interchange (pilot project). Final report. BASC (Barrow Arctic Science Consortium)). The conjunction of collaborative, interdisciplinary work and multiple pedagogic strategies applied in this specific educational practice has shown the potential of implementing research group initiatives in science education. We believe that educational approaches that create “spaces” for students to work together towards a goal defined as a common good, can contribute significantly to develop effective science programs in schools.

Keywords

Critical Thinking Environmental Education Knowledge Construction Sustainable Society Sociocultural Perspective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barraza L, Ruiz-Mallén I (2008) Estrategia participativa de investigación educativa socio ambiental con jóvenes de una comunidad forestal mexicana. In: Curiel A (ed) Investigación Socioambiental: Paradigmas en salud ambiental y educación ambiental. Universidad de Guadalajara y Universidad de Granada, GuadalajaraGoogle Scholar
  2. Barraza L, Duque-Aristizábal AM, Rebolledo G (2003) Environmental education: from policy to practice. Environ Educ Res 9(3):347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bodenhorn B (2007) Learning about environmental research in a context of climate change: an international scholastic interchange (pilot project). Final report. BASC (Barrow Arctic Science Consortium)Google Scholar
  4. Bodenhorn B, Barraza L, Ruiz-Mallen I (forthcoming manuscript) Toward an ethnography of collaboration. The Roots of Success: a case exampleGoogle Scholar
  5. Brundtland HC (1987) BrundtlandReport. World Commisionon Environment and Development, Tokio, JapanGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell C, Tytler R (2007) Students’ science conceptions, and views of learning. In: Venville G, Dawson V (eds) The art of teaching primary science. Allen and Unwin, Perth, pp 23–42Google Scholar
  7. Edwards J (2003) Butterfly business: connecting science and service learning. Investigating 19(1):8–11Google Scholar
  8. Grant T, Littlejohn G (eds) (2001) Teaching about climate change: cool schools tackle global warming. Green Teacher, Toronto. ISBN: 086571-437-1Google Scholar
  9. IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1991) Caring for the earth: a strategy for a sustainable living. Earthscan, GlandGoogle Scholar
  10. Primary Programs Framework (2007) Curriculum integration: making connections. Alberta Education, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith G (2002a) Going local. Educational Leadership. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 60(1):30–33Google Scholar
  12. Smith G (2002b) Place-based education: learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappan 83(8):584–593Google Scholar
  13. Sterling S (2001) Sustainable education: re-visioning learning and change. Green Books for The Schumacher Society, TotnesGoogle Scholar
  14. Tytler R, Barraza L, Paige K (2010) Values in science, environmental education and teacher education. In: Teacher education and values pedagogy: a student wellbeing approach. David Barlow, NSW, pp. 156–178Google Scholar
  15. Vygotsky LS (1986) Thought and language. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Watson P, Wienand N, Workman G (2009) Teaching sustainability: a valid methodology for addressing the associated problematic issues. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 53:908–912Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and EducationDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.University of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations