A Review of Ecosystem Services, Farmer Livelihoods, and Value Chains in Shade Coffee Agroecosystems

  • Shalene Jha
  • Christopher M. Bacon
  • Stacy M. Philpott
  • Robert A. Rice
  • V. Ernesto Méndez
  • Peter Läderach
Chapter
Part of the Issues in Agroecology – Present Status and Future Prospectus book series (AGRO, volume 1)

Abstract

Cultivation, processing, and consumption of coffee are dynamic processes that connect coffee farmers and agro-ecosystems with coffee drinkers spanning the globe. As a cash crop, coffee cultivation gained popularity in the Old and then the New world, and flourished under colonial regimes of the nineteenth and twentieth century. Coffee production patterns and management styles have changed ­drastically in the past two centuries and continue to shift, with the greatest recent expansions in East Asia. Traditionally, coffee is cultivated under a canopy of shade trees, a practice that ensures the longevity of the farm, supports biodiversity, and provides communities with a broad array of ecosystem services. However, many modern management schemes abandon shade practices. On the other hand, specialty coffee markets, like certified organic, certified shade (Bird Friendly), Fair Trade, and other certified coffees have gained recent popularity, though they still represent a small fraction of the global coffee economy. The global coffee economy is comprised of a wide array of coffee value chains that connect farmers with consumers, and thus impact farmer livelihoods at multiple spatial scales. Key players in the coffee value chain include local cooperatives, national government agencies, and global certification agencies. Similarly, ecosystem services provided by shade coffee occur at local, regional, and global scales, including pollination, erosion-control, and carbon sequestration, respectively. While the ecological and socio-economic costs and benefits associated with shade coffee are clear, this review reveals that there are many challenges to bridging sustainable coffee management with livelihood security. Furthermore, in this review we identify existing gaps in the literature and a number of promising research directions concerning the ecological and socio-economic impacts of coffee production.

References

  1. Agyeman J, Bullard RD, Evans B (2003) Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Akiyama T, Baffes J, Larson D, Varangis P (2003) Commodity market reform in Africa: some recent experience. Econ Syst 27:83–115Google Scholar
  3. Alegre C (1959) Climates et cafeiers d’Arabie. Agron Trop 14:25–48Google Scholar
  4. AMECAFE (2010) Data prepared and provided by Jose Luis Benvidez of the Asociacion Mexicana de la Cadena Productiva del Café, A.C, 7 July 2010Google Scholar
  5. Amekawaa Y, Sseguyaa H, Onzerea S, Carranzaa I (2010) Delineating the multifunctional role of agroecological practices: toward sustainable livelihoods for smallholder farmers in developing countries. J Sustain Agr 34:202–228Google Scholar
  6. Anacafe (2008) Green book: Guatemalan coffees. Guatemalan National Coffee Association, Guatemala CityGoogle Scholar
  7. Armbrecht I, Gallego MC (2007) Testing ant predation on the coffee berry borer in shaded and sun coffee plantations in Colombia. Entomol Exp Appl 124:261–267Google Scholar
  8. Arnould EJ, Plastina A, Ball D (2009) Does fair trade deliver on its core value proposition? Effects on income, educational attainment, and health in three countries. J Public Pol Market 28:186–201Google Scholar
  9. Bacon C (2005a) Confronting the coffee crisis: can fair trade, organic and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in northern Nicaragua. World Dev 33:497–511Google Scholar
  10. Bacon CM (2005b) Confronting the coffee crisis: Nicaraguan farmers use of cooperative, fair trade and agroecological networks to negotiate livelihoods and sustainability. PhD dissertation, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa CruzGoogle Scholar
  11. Bacon CM (2010) Who decides what is fair in fair trade? The agri-environmental governance of standards, access, and price. J Peasant Stud 37:111–147Google Scholar
  12. Bacon C, Méndez VE, Brown M (2005) Participatory action-research and support for community development and conservation: examples from shade coffee landscapes of El Salvador and Nicaragua. Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems (CASFS), University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa CruzGoogle Scholar
  13. Bacon CM, Méndez VE, Flores Gomez MA, Stuart D, Díaz Flores SR (2008a) Are sustainable coffee certifications enough to secure farmer livelihoods? The millenium development goals and Nicaragua’s fair trade cooperatives. Globalizations 5:259–274Google Scholar
  14. Bacon CM, Mendez VE, Gliessman S, Goodman D, Fox J (2008b) Confronting the coffee crisis: fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Bair J (2009) Frontiers of commodity chain research. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Bakermans MH, Vitz AC, Rodewald AD, Rengifo CG (2009) Migratory songbird use of shade coffee in the Venezuelan Andes with implications for conservation of Cerulean warbler. Biol Conserv 142:2476–2483Google Scholar
  17. Barreda A (2004) Invasiones invisibles, subsidios perversos, guerra continua. Hojarasca, La Jornada 20–23Google Scholar
  18. Bebbington AJ (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev 27:2021–2044Google Scholar
  19. Bebbington A (2000) Reencountering development: livelihood transitions and place transformations in the Andes. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90:495–520Google Scholar
  20. Beer J, Muschler R, Kass D, Somarriba E (1998) Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agroforest Syst 38:139–164Google Scholar
  21. Bennett E, Peterson G, Gordon L (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1–11Google Scholar
  22. Biderman J (1982) Class structure, the state and capitalist development in Nicaraguan agriculture. PhD dissertation, University of California-Berkeley, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  23. Borkhataria R, Collazo J, Groom M (2006) Additive effects of vertebrate predators on insects in a Puerto Rican coffee plantation. Ecol Appl 16:696–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Brenner N (2001) The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Prog Hum Geog 25:591–614Google Scholar
  25. Brown S (1996) Present and potential roles of forest in the global climate change debate. Unasylva 47:3–10Google Scholar
  26. Calo M, Wise TA (2005) Revaluing peasant coffee production: organic and fair trade markets in Mexico. Global Development and Environment Institute, MedfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Canadell JG, Raupach MR (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320:1456–1457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cannell M (1976) Crop physiological aspects of coffee bean yield: a review. Kenya Coffee 41:245–253Google Scholar
  29. Cannell M (1983) Coffee. Biologist 30:257–263Google Scholar
  30. Carr M (2001) The water relations and irrigation requirements of coffee. Exp Agric 37:1–36Google Scholar
  31. CEPAL (2002) Globalización y desarrollo. CEPAL, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Chambers R (1991) In search of professionalism, bureaucracy and sustainable livelihoods for the 21st century. Ids Bull-I Dev Stud 22:5–11Google Scholar
  33. Chambers R (1992) The self-deceiving state. Ids Bull-I Dev Stud 23:31–42Google Scholar
  34. Charrier A, Lashermes P, Eskes A (2009) Botany, genetics and genomics of coffee. In: Wintgens JN (ed.) Coffee: growing, processing, sustainable production. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 25–60Google Scholar
  35. Clarence-Smith W (2003) The coffee crisis in Asia, Africa, and the Pacific, 1870–1914. In: Clarence-Smith W, Topik S (eds.) The global coffee economy in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 1500–1989. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 100–119Google Scholar
  36. Cook O (1901) Shade in coffee culture. United States Department of Agriculture, Division of Botany, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260Google Scholar
  38. Craswell ET, Sajjapongse A, Howlett DJB, Dowling AJ (1997) Agroforestry in the management of sloping lands in Asia and the Pacific. Agroforest Syst 38:121–137Google Scholar
  39. Cruz-Angon A, Sillett TS, Greenberg R (2008) An experimental study of habitat selection by birds in a coffee plantation. Ecology 89:921–927PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. D’Haeze D, Deckers J, Raes D, Phong T, Loi H (2005) Environmental and socioeconomic impacts of institutional reforms on the agricultural sector of Vietnam land suitability assessment for Robusta coffee in the Dak Gan region. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:59–76Google Scholar
  41. Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. DaMatta F (2004) Ecophysiological constraints on the production of shaded and unshaded coffee: a review. Field Crop Res 84:99–114Google Scholar
  43. DaMatta FM, Chaves ARM, Pinheiro HA, Ducatti C, Loureiro ME (2003) Drought tolerance of two field-grown clones of Coffea canephora. Plant Sci 164:111–117Google Scholar
  44. Daviron B, Ponte S (2005) The coffee paradox: global markets, commodity trade, and the elusive promise of development. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Davis AP, Govaerts R, Bridson DM, Stoffelen P (2006) An annotated checklist of the genus Coffea L. (Rubiaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 152:465–512Google Scholar
  46. De la Mora A, Livingston G, Philpott SM (2008) Arboreal ant abundance and leaf miner damage in coffee agroecosystems in Mexico. Biotropica 40:742–746Google Scholar
  47. De Marco P, Coelho FM (2004) Services performed by the ecosystem: forest remnants influence agricultural cultures’ pollination and production. Biodivers Conserv 13:1245–1255Google Scholar
  48. Decazy F, Avelino J, Guyot B, Perriot JJ, Pineda C, Cilas C (2003) Quality of different Honduran coffees in relation to several environments. J Food Sci 68:23–56Google Scholar
  49. Devaux A, Horton D, Velasco C, Thiele G, López G, Bernet T, Reinoso I, Ordinola M (2009) Collective action for market chain innovation in the Andes. Food Policy 34:31–38Google Scholar
  50. Dick CW, Jones FA, Hardy OJ, Petit RJ (2008) Spatial scales of seed and pollen-mediated gene flow in tropical forest trees. Trop Plant Biol 1:20–33Google Scholar
  51. Dicum G, Luttinger N (1999) The coffee book: anatomy of an industry from crop to the last drop. The New Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Donald PF (2004) Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural commodity production systems. Conserv Biol 18:17–37Google Scholar
  53. Dossa EL, Fernandes ECM, Reid WS, Ezui K (2008) Above- and belowground biomass, nutrient and carbon stocks contrasting an open-grown and a shaded coffee plantation. Agroforest Syst 72:103–117Google Scholar
  54. Eakin H, Tucker C, Castellanos E (2006) Responding to the coffee crisis: a pilot study of farmers’ adaptations in Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras. Geogr J 172:156–171Google Scholar
  55. Elevitch CR, Wilkinson KM (2000) Agroforestry guide for the Pacific islands. Permanent Agriculture Resources, Holualoa, 240 ppGoogle Scholar
  56. Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S (2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol Econ 65:663–674Google Scholar
  57. Escalante F (1995) Coffee and agroforestry in Venezuela. Agroforest Today 7:5–7Google Scholar
  58. Escalante F, Aguilar R, Lugo P (1987) Identifacion, evaluacion y distribucion espacial de especies utilizadas como sombra en sistemas tradicionales de cafe (Coffea arabica) en zonas del estado Trujillo, Venezuela. Venezuala Forestal 3:50–62Google Scholar
  59. FAO (2008) Food and Agriculture Organization. Resource document. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor. Accessed Oct 2010
  60. FAO (2009) FAOSTAT: crops. Resource document. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor. Accessed Oct 2010
  61. FAO (2010) FAOSTAT: crops. Resource document. http://faostat.fao.org/site/570/default.aspx#ancor. Accessed Oct 2010
  62. Fox J (1994) The roots of Chiapas. Econ Polit Weekly 29:119–1122Google Scholar
  63. Fox J (1996) How does civil society thicken? the political construction of social capital in rural Mexico. World Dev 24:1089–1103Google Scholar
  64. Freeman A III (1993) The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  65. Fridell G (2006) Fair trade and neoliberalism – assessing emerging perspectives. Lat Am Perspect 33:8–28Google Scholar
  66. Gallina S, Mandujano S, Gonzalez-Romero A (1996) Conservation of mammalian biodiversity in coffee plantations of Central Veracruz. Agroforest Syst 33:13–27Google Scholar
  67. Gillison AN, Liswanti N, Budidarsono S, van Noordwijk M, Tomich TP (2004) Impact of cropping methods on biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 9:16–23Google Scholar
  68. Giovannucci D (2003) Emerging issues in the marketing and trade of organic products. In: Monograph in the proceedings of the OECD workshop on organic agriculture, OECD, Paris, Sept 2002Google Scholar
  69. Giovannucci D, Liu P, Byers A (2008) Adding value: certified coffee trade in North America. In: Liu P (ed.) Value-adding standards in the North American food market – trade opportunities in certified products for developing countries. FAO, Rome, pp 33–49Google Scholar
  70. Goodman D (2008) The international coffee crisis: a review of the issues. In: Bacon CM, Mendez VE, Gliessman S, Goodman D, Fox J (eds.) Confronting the coffee crisis: fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  71. Greenberg R, Bichier P, Angon AC, Reitsma R (1997a) Bird populations in shade and sun coffee plantations in Central Guatemala. Conserv Biol 11:448–459Google Scholar
  72. Greenberg R, Bichier P, Sterling J (1997b) Bird populations in rustic and planted shade coffee plantations of Eastern Chiapas, Mexico. Biotropica 29:501–514Google Scholar
  73. Greenberg R, Bichier P, Angon AC, MacVean C, Perez R, Cano E (2000) The impact of avian insectivory on arthropods and leaf damage in some Guatemalan coffee plantations. Ecology 81:1750–1755Google Scholar
  74. Greenberg R, Perfecto I, Philpott SM (2008) Agroforests as model systems for tropical ecology. Ecology 89:913–914PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Guadarrama-Zugasti C (2008) A grower typology approach to assessing the environmental impact of coffee farming in Veracruz, Mexico. In: Bacon CM, Méndez VE, Gliessman SR, Goodman D, Fox JA (eds.) Confronting the coffee crisis: fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 127–154Google Scholar
  76. Guhl A (2004) Coffee and landcover changes in the Colombian coffee region landscape 1970–1997. Ensayos, BogotaGoogle Scholar
  77. Gutman P (2003) Macroeconomics for sustainable development. Program Office, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  78. Guyot BD, Gueule JC, Maniez JJ, Perriot J, VL Giron (1996) Influence de l’altitude et de l’ombrage sur la qualité des cafés Arabica. Plantations, Recherche, Développement 3:272–283Google Scholar
  79. Hanson L, Terstappen V (2009) Collaboration on contentious issues: research partnerships for gender equity in Nicaragua’s fair trade coffee cooperatives. J Agromedicine 14:105–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Harrison G, DiSogra C, Manalo-LeClair G, Aguayo J, Yen W (2002) Over 2.2 million low-income California adults are food insecure; 658,000 suffer hunger. UCLA Healthy Policy Research BriefGoogle Scholar
  81. Harvey D (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  82. Henry M, Tittonell P, Manlay RJ, Bernoux B, Albrecht A, Vanlauwe B (2009) Biodiversity, carbon stocks and sequestration potential in aboveground biomass in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:238–252Google Scholar
  83. Hergoualc’h K, Skiba U, Harmand JM, Henault C (2008) Fluxes of greenhouse gases from Andosols under coffee in monoculture or shaded by Inga densiflora in Costa Rica. Biogeochemistry 89:329–345Google Scholar
  84. Heynen N (2007) Neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  85. Holt-Giménez E (2006) Campesino a campesino: voices from Latin America’s farmer to farmer movement for sustainable agriculture. Food First Books, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  86. ICAFE (1989) Instituto del Café de Costa Rica. Manual de recomendaciones para el cultivo del café. Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  87. Illy E (2002) The complexity of coffee. Sci Am 6:86–91Google Scholar
  88. International Coffee Organization (ICO) (2000) Monthly statistics. http://www.ico.org/prices/m1.htm. Accessed July 2010
  89. IPCC (2007) Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, WembleyGoogle Scholar
  90. Jack BK, Leimona B, Ferraro PJ (2009) A revealed preference approach to estimating supply curves for ecosystem services: use of auctions to set payments for soil erosion control in Indonesia. Conserv Biol 23:359–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Jaffe R, Bacon C (2008) From differentiated coffee markets toward alternative trade and knowledge networks. In: Bacon CM, Mendez VE, Gliessman S, Goodman D, Fox J (eds.) Confronting the coffee crisis: fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 311–336Google Scholar
  92. Jaffee D (2007) Brewing justice: fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  93. Jaramillo L (2002) Estimación del costo de oportunidad del uso de suelo forestal en ejidos a nivel nacional. DGIPEA working paper. Instituto Nacional de Ecología, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  94. Jha S, Dick CW (2008) Shade coffee farms promote genetic diversity of native trees. Curr Biol 18:1126–1128Google Scholar
  95. Jha S, Dick CW (2010) Native bees facilitate gene flow across shade coffee landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:13760–13764PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Jha S, Vandermeer J (2010) Impacts of coffee agroforestry management on tropical bee communities. Biol Conserv 143:1423–1431Google Scholar
  97. Johnson MD (2000) Effects of shade-tree species and crop structure on the winter arthropod and bird communities in a Jamaican shade coffee plantation. Biotropica 32:133–145Google Scholar
  98. Johnson MD, Levy NJ, Kellermann JL, Robinson DE (2009) Effects of shade and bird exclusion on arthropods and leaf damage on coffee farms in Jamaica’s Blue Mountains. Agroforest Syst 76:139–148Google Scholar
  99. Kay M, Franks TR, Smith L (1997) Water: economics, management and demand. E & FN Spon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  100. Kellermann J, Johnson M, Stercho A, Hackett S (2008) Ecological and economic services provided by birds on Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee farms. Conserv Biol 22:1177–1185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003a) Bee pollination and fruit set of Coffea arabica and C. canephora (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 90:153–157Google Scholar
  102. Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003b) Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:955–961Google Scholar
  103. Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003c) Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management. J Appl Ecol 40:837–845Google Scholar
  104. Klein AM, Cunningham SA, Bos M, Steffan-Dewenter I (2008) Advances in pollination ecology from tropical plantation crops. Ecology 89:935–943PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Kotecha S, Hieu P, Kuit M, Von Enden J, Swinkels R (2003) Vietnamese coffee competitiveness and policy options to improve it. Conference summary found at. www.xttmnew.agroviet.gov.vn/en/stories/Coffee_Policy_brief.pdf
  106. Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vazquez DP, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein AM, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10:299–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Läderach P, Oberthür T, Niederhauser N, Usma H, Collet L, Pohlan J (2006) Café especial: ­factores, dimensiones e interacciones. In: Pohlan J, Barrera J (eds.) El cafetal del futuro: realidades y visiones. Shaker, Aachen, pp 141–160Google Scholar
  108. Läderach P, Oberthür T, Pohlan J (2009) Management of intrinsic quality characteristics for ­specialty coffee – a framework developed and tested in coffee growing regions across Latin America. Dr. Müller Verlag, Saarbrück, Germany, 157 ppGoogle Scholar
  109. Läderach P, Lundy M, Jarvis A, Ramírez J, Pérez P, Schepp E, Eitzinger KA (2010) Predicted impact of climate change on coffee supply chains. In: Leal Filho W (ed.) The economic, social and political elements of climate change. Springer, Berlin, pp 703–724Google Scholar
  110. Lagemann J, Heuveldop J (1983) Characterization and evaluation of agroforestry systems. CATIE, TumalbaGoogle Scholar
  111. Lara-Estrada LD (2005) Efectos de la altitud, sombra, producción y fertilización sobre la calidad del café (Coffea arabica L. var. caturra) producido en sistemas agroforestales de la zona cafetalera nor-central de Nicaragua. Agroforestry. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, TurrialbaGoogle Scholar
  112. Larsen A, Philpott SM (2010) Twig-nesting ants: the hidden predators of the coffee berry borer in Chiapas, Mexico. Biotropica 42:342–347Google Scholar
  113. Lewin B, Giovannucci D, Varangis P (2004) Coffee markets: new paradigms in global supply and demand. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  114. Lin BB (2007) Agroforestry management as an adaptive strategy against potential microclimate extremes in coffee agriculture. Agric For Meteorol 144:85–94Google Scholar
  115. Lin BB (2010) The role of agroforestry in reducing water loss through soil evaporation and crop transpiration in coffee agroecosystems. Agric For Meteorol 150:510–518Google Scholar
  116. Lin BB, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2008) Synergies between agricultural intensification and climate change could create surprising vulnerabilities for crops. Bioscience 58:847–854Google Scholar
  117. Linton A (2005) Partnering for sustainability: business–NGO alliances in the coffee industry. Develop Prac 15:600–614Google Scholar
  118. Lomeli-Flores J (2007) Natural enemies and mortality factors of the coffee leaf miner Leucoptera coffeella (Guerin-Meneville) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae) in Chiapas, Mexico. PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University, College StationGoogle Scholar
  119. Lovera S (2004) Environmental markets impoverish the poor. Resource document. Ecosystem Marketplace. http://ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/article.opinion.php?componentid=2268&componentversionid. Accessed Oct 2010
  120. Lyon S (2008) We want to be equal to them: Fair-trade coffee certification and gender equity within organizations. Hum Organ 67:258–268Google Scholar
  121. Lyon S, Bezaury JA, Mutersbaugh T (2010) Gender equity in fair trade-organic coffee producer organizations: cases from Mesoamerica. Geoforum 41:93–103Google Scholar
  122. Magalhaes A, Angelocci L (1976) Sudden alterations in water balance associated with flower bud opening in coffee plants. J Hortic Sci 51:419–421Google Scholar
  123. Manrique AJ, Thimann RE (2002) Coffee (Coffea arabica) pollination with africanized honeybees in Venezuela. Interciencia 27:414–416Google Scholar
  124. Marsden T, Munton R, Ward N, Wahtmore S (1996) Agricultural geography and the political economy approach: a review. Econ Geogr 72:361–375Google Scholar
  125. Marston S (2000) The social construction of scale. Prog Hum Geogr 24:219–242Google Scholar
  126. McAfee K, Shapiro EN (2010) Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the State. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100:579–599Google Scholar
  127. McCarthy J (2004) Privatizing conditions of production: trade agreements as neoliberal environmental governance. Geoforum 35:327–341Google Scholar
  128. McCauley DJ (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443:27–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. McCreery D (1995) Wage labor, free labor and vagrancy laws: the transition to capitalism in Guatemala. In: Roseberry W, Gudmundson L, Kutschbach MS (eds.) Coffee, society, and power in Latin America. Johns Hopkins University, Maryland, pp 1920–1945Google Scholar
  130. Méndez VE, Gliessman SR, Gilbert GS (2007) Tree biodiversity in farmer cooperatives of a shade coffee landscape in western El Salvador. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119:145–159Google Scholar
  131. Méndez VE, Shapiro EN, Gilbert GS (2009) Cooperative management and its effects on shade tree diversity, soil properties and ecosystem services of coffee plantations in western El Salvador. Agroforest Syst 76:111–126Google Scholar
  132. Méndez VE, Bacon CM, Olson M, Morris KS, Shattuck AK (2010a) Agrobiodiversity and shade coffee smallholder livelihoods: a review and synthesis of ten years of research in Central America. Prof Geogr 62:357–376Google Scholar
  133. Méndez VE, Bacon C, Olson M, Petchers S, Herrador D, Carranza C, Trujillo L, Guadarrama-Zugasti C, Cordón A, Mendoza A (2010b) Effects of fair trade and organic certifications on small-scale coffee farmer households in Central America and Mexico. Renewable Agric Food Syst 25:236–251Google Scholar
  134. Michon G, Mary F, Bompard JM (1986) Multistoried agroforestry garden system in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Agroforest Syst 4:315–338Google Scholar
  135. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA ) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  136. Moguel P, Toledo VM (1999) Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conserv Biol 13:11–21Google Scholar
  137. Muriel SB, Kattan GH (2009) Effects of patch size and type of coffee matrix on ithomiine butterfly diversity and dispersal in cloud-forest fragments. Conserv Biol 23:948–956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Muschler RG (1997) Shade or sun for ecologically sustainable coffee production: a summary of environmental key factors. In: Proceedings of the 3rd scientific week, CATIE, Turrialba, 3–7 Feb 1997, pp 109–112Google Scholar
  139. Muschler RG (2001) Shade improves coffee quality in a sub-optimal coffee zone of Costa Rica. Agroforest Syst 51:131–139Google Scholar
  140. Mutersbaugh T (2004) Serve and certify: paradoxes of service work in organic-coffee certification. Environ Plann D 22:533–552Google Scholar
  141. Mutersbaugh T (2005) Fighting standards with standards: harmonization, rents, and social accountability in certified agrofood networks. Environ Plann A 37:2033–2051Google Scholar
  142. Neelin JD, Munnich M, Su H, Meyerson JE, Holloway CE (2006) Tropical drying trends in global warming models and observations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6110–6115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Nigh R (1997) Organic agriculture and globalization: a Maya associative corporation in Chiapas, Mexico. Hum Organ 56(4):427–435Google Scholar
  144. Nolasco M (1985) Cafe y sociedad en Mexico. Centro de Ecodesarrollo, Mexico City, 454 ppGoogle Scholar
  145. Nunes M, Bierhuizen J, Ploegman C (1968) Studies on the productivity of coffee, I: effect of light, temperature, and CO2 concentration on photosynthesis of Coffea arabica. Acta Bot Neerl 17:93–102Google Scholar
  146. Nutman F (1937) Studies on the physiology of Coffea arabica, I: photosynthesis of coffee leaves under natural conditions. Ann Bot 1:353–367Google Scholar
  147. O’Brien TG, Kinnaird MF (2003) Caffeine and conservation. Science 5619:587Google Scholar
  148. O’Rourke D (2004) Transition environments: ecological and social challenges to post-socialist industrial development. In: Peet R, Watts M (eds.) Liberation ecologies: environment, development, social movements. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  149. Oxfam (2001) Bitter coffee: how the poor are paying for the slump in coffee prices. www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/fairtrade/coffee/OxfamPriceReport.pdf
  150. Oxfam (2002) Mugged: poverty in your coffee cup. www.oxfam.org.uk/resources/papers/mugged.html
  151. Palm C, Van Noordwijk V, Woomer P, Alegre J, Arevalo L, Castilla C, Cordeiro D, Hariah K, Kotto-Same J, Moukam A, Parton W, Ricse A, Rodriques V, Sitompul S (2005) Carbon losses and sequestration alter land use change in the humid tropics. In: Palm CA, Vosti SA, Sanchez PA, Ericksen PJ (eds.) Slash-and-burn agriculture: the search for alternatives. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 41–63Google Scholar
  152. Peet R, Watts M (2004) Liberation ecologies: environment, development, social movements. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  153. Peeters LYK, Soto-Pinto L, Perales H, Montoya G, Ishiki M (2003) Coffee production, timber, and firewood in traditional and Inga-shaded plantations in Southern Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95:481–493Google Scholar
  154. Peluso NL (1994) Rich forests, poor people: resource control and resistance in Java. University of California Press, Berkeley, 336 ppGoogle Scholar
  155. Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2006) The effect of an ant-hemipteran mutualism on the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) in southern Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 117:218–221Google Scholar
  156. Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2008a) Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems – a new conservation paradigm. Ann NY Acad Sci 1134:173–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2008b) Spatial pattern and ecological process in the coffee agroforestry system. Ecology 89:915–920PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Perfecto I, Rice RA, Greenberg R, VanderVoort ME (1996) Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 46:598–608Google Scholar
  159. Perfecto I, Vandermeer JH, Bautista GL, Nunez GI, Greenberg R, Bichier P, Langridge S (2004) Greater predation in shaded coffee farms: the role of resident neotropical birds. Ecology 85:2677–2681Google Scholar
  160. Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Mas A, Pinto LS (2005) Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification. Ecol Econ 54:435–446Google Scholar
  161. Perfecto I, Armbrecht I, Philpott SM, Soto-Pinto L, Dietsch TV (2007) Shaded coffee and the stability of rainforest margins in Latin America. In: Tscharntke T, Leuschner C, Zeller M, Guhadja E, Bidin A (eds.) The stability of tropical rainforest margins, linking ecological, ­economic and social constraints of land use and conservation. Springer Environmental Science Series, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  162. Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Wright A (2009) Nature’s matrix linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  163. Peyser R (2010) Hunger in the coffee lands. Specialty Coffee Association of America, AnaheimGoogle Scholar
  164. Phillips S, Anderson R, Sapohire R (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259Google Scholar
  165. Philpott SM, Maldonado J, Vandermeer J, Perfecto I (2004) Taking trophic cascades up a level: behaviorally-modified effects of phorid flies on ants and ant prey in coffee agroecosystems. Oikos 105:141–147Google Scholar
  166. Philpott SM, Bichier P, Rice R, Greenberg R (2007) Field-testing ecological and economic benefits of coffee certification programs. Conserv Biol 21:975–985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Philpott SM, Bichier P, Rice RA, Greenberg R (2008a) Biodiversity conservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia. Biodivers Conserv 17:1805–1820Google Scholar
  168. Philpott SM, Lin BB, Jha S, Brines SJ (2008b) A multi-scale assessment of hurricane impacts on agricultural landscapes based on land use and topographic features. Agric Ecosyst Environ 128:12–20Google Scholar
  169. Philpott SM, Arendt WJ, Armbrecht I, Bichier P, Diestch TV, Gordon C, Greenberg R, Perfecto I, Reynoso-Santos R, Soto-Pinto L, Tejeda-Cruz C, Williams-Linera G, Valenzuela J, Zolotoff JM (2008c) Biodiversity loss in Latin American coffee landscapes: review of the evidence on ants, birds, and trees. Conserv Biol 22:1093–1105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Philpott S, Soong O, Lowenstein J, Pulido A, Tobar-Lopez D, DeClerck F (2009) Functional traits and ecosystem services: bird predation on arthropods in tropical agroecosystems. Ecol Appl 19:1858–1867PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Ponte S (2002) The ‘Latte Revolution’? Regulation, markets and consumption in the global coffee chain. World Dev 30:1099–1122Google Scholar
  172. Ponte S (2008) Greener than thou: the political economy of fish ecolabeling and its local manifestations in South Africa. World Dev 36:159–175Google Scholar
  173. Prendergast M (1999) Uncommon grounds: the history of coffee and how it transformed our world. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  174. Pretty JN (2002) Agri-Culture: reconnecting people, land, and nature. Earthscan Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  175. Ramírez L (1993) Producción de café (Coffea arabica) bajo diferentes niveles de fertilización con y sin sombra de Erythrina poeppigiana (Walpers). In: Cook OF (ed.) Erythrina in the new and old worlds. Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association, Paia, pp 121–124Google Scholar
  176. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5242–5247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. Raw A, Free JB (1977) Pollination of coffee (Coffea arabica) by honeybees. Trop Agric 54:365–370Google Scholar
  178. Raynolds LT, Murray D, Heller A (2007) Regulating sustainability in the coffee sector: a comparative analysis of third-party environmental and social certification initiatives. Agric Hum Values 24:147–163Google Scholar
  179. Renard M (2010) The Mexican coffee crisis. Lat Am Perspect 37:21–33Google Scholar
  180. Ribot JC, Peluso NL (2003) A theory of access. Rural Sociol 68:153–181Google Scholar
  181. Rice R (2000) Noble goals and challenging terrain: organic and fair trade coffee movements in the global marketplace. J Agric Environ Ethics 14:39–66Google Scholar
  182. Rice R (2003) Coffee production in a time of crisis: social and environmental connections. SAIS Rev 23:221–245Google Scholar
  183. Rice RA (2008) Agricultural intensification within agroforestry: the case of coffee and wood products. Agric Ecosyst Environ 128:212–218Google Scholar
  184. Rice PD, McLean J (1999) Sustainable coffee at the crossroads. Consumer’s Choice Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  185. Rice R, Ward J (1996) Coffee, conservation, and commerce in the Western Hemisphere. The Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center and the Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  186. Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Michener CD (2004) Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12579–12582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. Robertson GP, Swinton SM (2005) Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: a grand challenge for agriculture. Front Ecol Environ 3:38–46Google Scholar
  188. Robertson GP, Broome JC, Chornesky EA, Frankenberger JR, Johnson P, Lipson M, Miranowski JA, Owens ED, Pimentel D, Thrupp LA (2004) Rethinking the vision for environmental research in US agriculture. Bioscience 54:61–65Google Scholar
  189. Romero-Alvarado Y, Soto-Pinto L, Garcia-Barrios L, Barrera-Gaytan JF (2002) Coffee yields and soil nutrients under the shades of Inga sp. vs. multiple species in Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforest Syst 54:215–224Google Scholar
  190. Roncal-Garcia S, Soto-Pinto L, Castellanos-Albores J, Ramirez-Marcial N, de Jong B (2008) Agroforestry systems and carbon stocks in indigenous communities from Chiapas, Mexico. Interciencia 33:200–206Google Scholar
  191. Rosa H, Kandel S, Dimas L (2004) Compensation for environmental services and rural communities: lessons from the Americas. Int Forest Rev 6:187–194Google Scholar
  192. Roubik DW (2002) Tropical agriculture – the value of bees to the coffee harvest. Nature 417:708–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. Salinas-Zavala CA, Douglas AV, Diaz HF (2002) Interannual variability of NDVI in northwest Mexico. Associated climatic mechanisms and ecological implications. Remote Sens Environ 82:417–430Google Scholar
  194. Sayre N (2005) Ecological and geographical scale: parallels and potential for integration. Prog Hum Geogr 29:276–290Google Scholar
  195. Schroth G, Krauss U, Gasparotto L, Aguilar JAD, Vohland K (2000) Pests and diseases in agroforestry systems of the humid tropics. Agroforest Syst 50:199–241Google Scholar
  196. Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. Institute for Development Studies (IDS), BrightonGoogle Scholar
  197. Scoones I (2009) Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. J Peasant Stud 36:171–196Google Scholar
  198. Shiva V (2008) Soil not oil: environmental justice in a time of climate crisis. South End Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  199. Shulman M, Garret P (1990) Cluster analysis and typology construction: the case of small-scale tobacco farmers. Sociol Spectrum 10:413–428Google Scholar
  200. Somarriba E, Harvey C, Samper M, Anthony F, Gonzalez J, Staver C, Rice R (2004) Biodiversity in coffee plantations. In: Schroth G, Fonseca G, Harvey C, Gascon C, Vasconcelos H, Izac AMN (eds.) Biodiversity in coffee plantations. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 198–226Google Scholar
  201. Soto-Pinto L, Perfecto I, Castillo-Hernandez J, Caballero-Nieto J (2000) Shade effect on coffee production at the northern Tzeltal zone of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 80:61–69Google Scholar
  202. Soto-Pinto L, Perfecto I, Caballero-Nieto J (2002) Shade over coffee: its effects on berry borer, leaf rust and spontaneous herbs in Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforest Syst 55:37–45Google Scholar
  203. Soto-Pinto L, Anzueto M, Mendoza J, Ferrer GJ, de Jong B (2010) Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforest Syst 78:39–51Google Scholar
  204. Staver C, Guharay F, Monterroso D, Muschler RG (2001) Designing pest-suppressive multistrata perennial crop systems: shade-grown coffee in Central America. Agroforest Syst 53:151–170Google Scholar
  205. Steward C (2007) From colonization to “environmental soy”: a case study of environmental and socio-economic valuation in the Amazon soy frontier. Agric Hum Values 24:107–122Google Scholar
  206. Sturgeon T (2000) Turnkey production networks: a new American model of industrial organization? Industrial Performance Center, Working paper, MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  207. Swinton SM, Lupi F, Robertson GP, Hamilton SK (2007) Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ 64:245–252Google Scholar
  208. Talbot JM (2004) Grounds for agreement: the political economy of the coffee commodity chain. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  209. Topik S, Talbot J, Samper M (2010) Introduction globalization, neoliberalism, and the Latin American coffee societies. Lat Am Perspect 171:5–20Google Scholar
  210. Trujillo L (2008) Coffee production strategies in a changing rural landscape: a case study in Central Veracruz, Mexico. In: Bacon CM, Mendez VE, Gliessman SR, Goodman D, Fox JA (eds.) Confronting the coffee crisis: fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 69–98Google Scholar
  211. Tscharntke T, Sekercioglu C, Dietsch T, Sodhi N, Hoehn P, Tylianakis J (2008) Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology 89:944–951PubMedGoogle Scholar
  212. Ukers W (1922) All about coffee. The Tea and Coffee Trade Journal Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  213. USDL (2010) US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Resource document. http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dsrv. Accessed Oct 2010
  214. Vaast P, Bertrand B, Perriot J-J, Guyot B, Genard M (2006) Fruit thinning and shade improve bean characteristics and beverage quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) under optimal conditions. J Sci Food Agric 86:197Google Scholar
  215. Valkila J, Nygren A (2010) Impacts of fair trade certification on coffee farmers, cooperatives, and laborers in Nicaragua. Agric Hum Values 27:321–333Google Scholar
  216. Van Bael SA, Philpott SM, Greenberg R, Bichier P, Barber NA, Mooney KA, Gruner DS (2008) Birds as predators in tropical agroforestry systems. Ecology 89:928–934PubMedGoogle Scholar
  217. Van der Vossen HAM (2005) A critical analysis of the agronomic and economic sustainability of organic coffee production. Exp Agric 41:449–473Google Scholar
  218. Varangis P, Siegel P, Giovannucci D, Lewin B (2003) Dealing with the coffee crisis in Central America: impacts and strategies. In: World Bank Policy Research #2993. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  219. Vélez M, Bustillo A, Posada F (2001) Hormigas de la zona central cafetera y perspectivas de su uso en el control de Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Resúmenes XXVIII Congreso (ed. by Sociedad Colombiana de Entomología), PereiraGoogle Scholar
  220. Waltert M, Mardiastuti A, Muhlenberg M (2005) Effects of land use on bird species richness in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Conserv Biol 18:1339–1346Google Scholar
  221. Watson R, Herren R (eds) (2009) International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development (IAASTD): synthesis report. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  222. Watts MJ (2007) What might resistance to neoliberalism consist of? In: Heynen N, McCarthy J, Prudham S (eds.) Neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences. Routledge, London, pp 273–279Google Scholar
  223. WDPA Consortium (2004) National IUCN protected areas, global. Downloadable Data. UNEP, IUCN, Oct 2004Google Scholar
  224. Webster PJ, Holland GJ, Curry JA, Chang HR (2005) Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science 309:1844–1846PubMedGoogle Scholar
  225. Williams R (1994) States and social evolution: coffee and the rise of national governments in Central America. University of North Carolina, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  226. Wilson K (1999) Coffee, cocoa and tea. CABI, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  227. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk – natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  228. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  229. You LWS (2005) Assessing the spatial distribution of crop production using a cross-entropy. Int J Appl Earth Obs 7:310–323Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shalene Jha
    • 1
  • Christopher M. Bacon
    • 2
  • Stacy M. Philpott
    • 3
  • Robert A. Rice
    • 4
  • V. Ernesto Méndez
    • 5
  • Peter Läderach
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, Policy and ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Studies InstituteSanta Clara UniversitySanta ClaraUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of ToledoToledoUSA
  4. 4.Migratory Bird CenterSmithsonian Conservation Biology InstituteWashingtonUSA
  5. 5.Environmental Program and Plant and Soil Science DepartmentUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  6. 6.Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT)CaliColombia

Personalised recommendations