Skip to main content
  • 905 Accesses

Abstract

This book may be viewed as a complex book about the topic of complexity. It is both critical of the present state of art in the social sciences and constructive in its view about the possibility of building a new science for the future. A science that takes the complexity of reality as real. A science that is based on a new framework: a framework that does not yet exist. The new framework, therefore, will be a framework that has to be invented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Margaret Archer [2000], p. 306.

  2. 2.

    He lived from 1896–1934.

  3. 3.

     The ‘most simple’ cases are very complex, – one cannot be surprised enough about that!

References

  • Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (2002). Reflections on meta-reality: Transcendence, emancipation and everyday life. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1996). On creativity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockman, J. (1995). The third culture: Beyond the scientific revolution. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockman, J. (2006, January 1). Edge The World Question Center. The Huffington Post, pp. 1–2. Retrieved July 24, 2007, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-brockman/the-edge-annual-question_b_13106.html

  • Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohr, S. (2000). Magritte. San Francisco: Abrams Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, D. W., Friesen, S., & Clifford, P. (2006). Curriculum in abundance. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jörg, T. (2004a). A theory of reciprocal learning in dyads. Cognitive systems 6(2, 3) 159–170. Groningen: European Society for the Study of Cognitive Systems (ESSCS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jörg, T. (2004b). Complexity theory and the reinvention of reality of education. In Proceedings of the 2004 complexity science and educational research conference (pp. 121–146), September 30–October 3, 2004. Canada: Chaffey’s Locks. (http://www.complexityandeducation.ca)

  • Kauffman, S. (1995a). Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1995b). At home in the universe. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2001). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schama, S. (2006). The power of art. London: BBC Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, D. (2005). Paradigmatic complexity: Emerging ideas and historical views of the complexity sciences. In W. C. Doll Jr., M. J. Fleener, D. Trueit, & J. St.Julien (Eds.), Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and culture (pp. 133–151). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster, H. (1993). Understanding understanding. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1987a). Thought and language (A. Kozulin Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1987b). In R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Problems of general psychology, Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ton Jörg .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jörg, T. (2011). Introduction. In: New Thinking in Complexity for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1303-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics