Macro-Context and Its Cross-Country Variation

Chapter
Part of the European Studies of Population book series (ESPO, volume 17)

Abstract

The context is a multi-dimensional and multi-level ‘structure of institutions that embody information about opportunities and restrictions, consequences and expectations, rights and duties, incentives and sanctions, models, guidelines, and definitions of the world’ (de Bruijn, 1999: 21). This information is continuously transmitted to individuals and defines the choice options they face. As described in Chapter 3 four dimensions of the macro-context are considered relevant to women’s fertility and employment decisions: institutional (family policies), structural (labour market structures), cultural (gender norms), and economic (living standards). The first three influence the magnitude of the price effect, producing the so-called institutional, structural and cultural incompatibilities between childbearing and market work. The intensity of these incompatibilities depends on the extent to which mothers’ work is socially accepted and institutionally supported and to which the labour market is prepared to accommodate female labour. The fourth dimension of the context affects the income effect.

Keywords

Parental Leave Family Policy Country Ranking Policy Indicator Labour Market Entry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aaberge, R., Colombino, U., Del Boca, D., Ermisch, J., Francesconi, M., Pasqua, S., et al. (2005). Labor supply and fertility in Europe and the U.S. In T. Boeri, D. Del Boca, & C. Pissarides (Eds.), Women at work: An economic perspective (pp. 125–153). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anttonen, A., & Sipilä, J. (1996). European social care services: Is it possible to identify models? Journal of European Social Policy, 6(2), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Addio, A. C., & M. M.d’Ercole. (2005). Trends and determinants of fertility rates in OECD countries: The role of policies (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 27). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  4. De Bruijn, B. J. (1999). Foundations of demographic theory: Choice, process, theory. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.Google Scholar
  5. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gauthier, A. H. (1996). The state and the family: A comparative analysis of family policies in industrialized countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gornick, J. C., Meyers, M. K., & Ross, K. E. (1997). Supporting the employment of mothers: Policy variations across fourteen welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 7, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Jaumotte, F. (2003). Labour force participation of women: Empirical evidence on the role of policy and other determinants in OECD Countries. OECD Economic Studies, 37, 52–108.Google Scholar
  11. Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of Welfare States. Social Politics, 7, 127–191.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, J., & Ostner, I. (1995). Gender and the evolution of European social policies. In S. Leibfried & P. Pierson (Eds.), European social policy: Between fragmentation and integration (pp. 159–193). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  13. Matysiak, A., & Steinmetz, S. (2008). Finding their way? Female employment patterns in West Germany, East Germany, and Poland. European Sociological Review, 24(3), 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meulders, D., & S. O’Dorchai. (2008). The position of mothers in the comparative welfare state perspective. In D. Del Boca & C. Wetzels (Eds.), Social policies, labour markets and motherhood: A comparative analysis of European countries (pp. 1–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Muszyńska, M. (2007). Structural and cultural determinants of fertility in Europe. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Neyer, G. (2006). Family policies and fertility in Europe: Fertility policies at the intersection of gender policies, employment policies and care policies (MPIDR Working Paper 2006-010). Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.Google Scholar
  17. Neyer, G., & Andersson, G. (2008). Consequences of family policies on childbearing behavior: Effects or artifacts? Population and Development Review, 34(4), 699–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Brien, M. (2009). Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: International perspectives and policy impact. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624(1), 190–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pascall, G., & Lewis, J. (2004). Emerging gender regimes and policies for gender equality in a wider Europe. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pascall, G., & Manning, N. (2000). Gender and social policy: Comparing welfare states in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Journal of European Social Policy, 10, 240–266.Google Scholar
  22. Philipov, D. (2008). Family-related gender attitudes. In C. Höhn, D. Avramov, & I. E. Kotowska (Eds.), People, population change and policies: Lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study, Vol 2: Demographic knowledge – gender – ageing (pp. 153–174). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Rostgaard, T. (2004). Family support policies in Central and Eastern Europe – A Decade and a half transition. Budapest: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  24. Treas, J., & Widmer, E. D. (2000). Married women’s employment over the life course: Attitudes in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 78, 1409–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trifiletti, R. (1999). Southern European welfare regimes and the worsening position of women. Journal of European Social Policy, 9, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keck, W., Hessel, P., & Saraceno, C. (2009). Database on intergenerational policy indicators. Methodological Report. Multilinks Research Report.Google Scholar
  27. Letablier, M.-T. (1998). Comparing family policies in Europe (Periodic Progress Report No. 1 of the thematic network ‘Working and mothering: Social practices and social policies’ TSER Programme of the European Commission, Area III: Research into Social Integration and Social Exclusion in Europe.Google Scholar
  28. Saraceno, C., & Keck, W. (2008). The institutional framework of intergenerational family obligations in Europe: A conceptual and methodological overview. Multilinks Research Report.Google Scholar
  29. Thevenon, O. (2010). Macro-level database on fertility and policies supporting families with children in European and OECD countries. Deliverable within the REPRO project.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Warsaw School of EconomicsInstitute of Statistics and DemographyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations