Advertisement

Psychopathic Resentment

  • John Deigh
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 116)

Abstract

Hitchcock, in Shadow of a Doubt, introduced a new kind of villain into his films. His previous villains, while conventionally ruthless and sinister, were largely plot devices. His most successful earlier films were about espionage, reflecting the growing political tensions in Europe at the time, and the villains in those films were spies and assassins whose intrigues created the suspense for which Hitchcock had become famous. In Shadow of a Doubt, by contrast, the suspense comes from the villain himself: one Charles Oakley, masterfully played by Joseph Cotton. Oakley, to his sister and her family, is the worldly Uncle Charlie, a man who exudes boyish charm, displays impeccable manners, and is attentive to all in his company, especially the women. And they in turn adore him. He is also, as we see in the opening scenes, in flight from the law, and as we later learn, a serial killer who preys on widows and who has sought refuge in the small California town of Santa Rosa, where his sister and her family live.

Keywords

Moral Judgment Moral Responsibility Moral Obligation Moral Agency Reactive Attitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Darwall, S. 2006. The Second Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Deigh, J. 1995. “Empathy and Universalizability.” Ethics 105:743–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deigh, J. 2011. “Reactive Attitudes Revisited.” In Morality and the Emotions, edited by C. Bagnoli. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hare, R. D. 2003. Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist, 2nd ed. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Hoffman, M. 2000. Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hume, D. 1975. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by P. H. Nidditch, 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hume, D. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by P. H. Nidditch, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Rawls, J. 1963. “The Sense of Justice.” Philosophical Review 72:281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  10. Rousseau, J. J. 1979. Emile or On Education. Translated by A. Bloom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Strawson, P. F. 1962. “Freedom and Resentment.” Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, 1–25. Reprinted in G. Watson (ed.), Free Will, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wallace, R. J. 1996. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Watson, G. 1988. “Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme.” In Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions, edited by F. Schoeman, 256–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations