Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Global E-Government

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Global Geographies of the Internet

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Geography ((BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY,volume 1))

  • 1950 Accesses

Abstract

As the internet has spread in size and scope, its applications have included the interactions between many governments and their citizens. In addition to the growth of personal and commercial uses of the internet, electronic government, or e-government, expanded in tandem throughout the world. User-friendly graphical interfaces expedited this process enormously and opened the possibility of two-way flows of digital information between citizens and their states (and more recently, have paved the way for mobile governance, or m-government). There are many definitions of e-government (Yildiz 2007), but all essentially point to the use of information technologies (typically the internet) to facilitate the delivery of government information and services, restructure administrative procedures, and enhance citizen participation. Not surprisingly, the topic has drawn considerable scholarly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, B., Juillet, L., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and government on-line in Canada: Partnerships, people and prospects. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., Grönlund, A., Moe, C., & Sein, M. (2005). E-government in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 17(2), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arredondo, M., Catalán, R., Montesinos, J., & Monsalve, S. (2004). Introducing new information and communication technologies in two rural schools in central Chile: An ethnographic approximation. In . M. Bonilla and G. Cliché (Eds.). Internet and society in Latin American and the Caribbean Toronto: Southbound. http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-45776-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html.

  • Basu, S. (2004). E-government and developing countries: An overview. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 18(1), 109–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Mahizhnan, A., & Andiappan. N. (2008). E-government in the knowledge society. In T. Yigitcanlar, K. Velibeyogluand, and S.Baum (Eds.). Creative urban regions: Harnessing urban technologies to support knowledge city initiatives. (132–147). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Bergener, P., & Räckers, M. (2008). Digital divide in e-government: The e-inclusion gap model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5184, 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, V. (2009). Flexible information infrastructures in Dutch e-government collaboration arrangements: Experiences and policy implications. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertot, J., Jaeger, P., & Grimes, J. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan, S. (2010). E-government in Kazakhstan: Challenges and its role to development. Public Organization Review, 10(1), 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera Paz, J. (2004). Navigators and castaways in cyberspace: Psychosocial experiences and cultural practices in school children’s Internet. In M. Bonilla and G. Cliché (Eds.), Internet and society in Latin American and the Caribbean. Toronto: Southbound. http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-45776-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html.

  • Çayhan, B. (2008). Implementing e-government in Turkey: A comparison of online public service delivery in Turkey and the European Union. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 35(8), 1–11. http://www.ejisdc.org.

  • Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: “E-government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance, 16(2), 271–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y., Lau, M., & Pan, S. (2008). E-government implementation: A macro analysis of Singapore’s e-government initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatillon, G. (2004). E-government in France. In M. Eifert & J. Püschel (Eds.), National electronic government: Comparing governance structures in multi-layer administrations (pp. 82–115). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, A., Pan, S., Zhang, J., Huang, W., & Zhu, S. (2009). Managing e-government implementation in China: A process perspective. Information and Management, 46(4), 203–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M., & Compaine, B. (Eds.). (2001). The digital divide. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crang, M., Crosbie, T., & Graham, S. (2006). Variable geometries of connection: Urban digital divides and the uses of information technology. Urban Studies, 43(13), 2551–2570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakins, E., & Dillon, S. (2002). E-government in New Zealand: The local authority perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(5), 375–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druke, H. (Ed.). (2005). Local electronic government: A comparative study. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugdale, A., Daly, A., Papandrea, F., & Maley, M. (2005). Accessing e-government: Challenges for citizens and organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(1), 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eifert, M. (2004). Electronic government in Germany. In M. Eifert & J. Ole Püschel (Eds.), National electronic government: Comparing governance structures in multi-layer administrations (pp. 116–135). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • EurActive. (2009). Internet sees Estonia vote first in EU elections. http://www.euractiv.com/en/eu-elections/internet-sees-estonia-vote-eu-elections/article-182706

  • Faisal, M., & Raman, Z. (2008). E-government in India: Modelling the barriers to its adoption and diffusion. Electronic Government, 5(2), 181–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falch, M., & Henten, A. (2000). Digital Denmark: From information society to network society. Telecommunications Policy, 24(5), 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferro, E., & Sorrentino, M. (2010). Can intermunicipal collaboration help the diffusion of e-government in peripheral areas? Evidence from Italy. Government Information Quarterly, 27(1), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finquelievich, S., Martinez, S., Jara, A., Baumann, P., Casas, A., Zamalvide, M., Fressoli, M., & Turrubiates, R. (2004). The social impact of introducing ICTs in local government and public services: Case studies in Buenos Aires and Montevideo. In M. Bonilla and G. Cliché (Eds.). Internet and society in Latin American and the Caribbean. Toronto: Southbound. http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-45776-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html

  • Flak, L., Olsen, D., & Wolcot, P. (2005). Local e-government in Norway: Current status and emerging issues. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 17(2), 41–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountain, J. (2001). The virtual state: Transforming American government? National Civic Review, 90(3), 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froomkin, A. (2003). Habermas@Discourse.net. Toward a critical theory of cyberspace. Harvard Law Review, 116(3), 740–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funilkul, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Chongsuphajaisiddhi, V. (2011). E-government information quality: A case study of Thailand. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6866, 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S., & Horsburgh, S. (2010). Do they want it? Do they use it? The ‘demand-side’ of e-government in Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, R., Gray, A., & McComb, S. (2009). How responsive is e-government? Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. (2001). Elections online: Assessing internet voting in light of the Arizona Democratic primary. Political Science Quarterly, 116(4), 561–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giritli Nygren, K. (2009). E-governmentality: On electronic administration in local government. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 7(1), 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorla, N. (2007). A survey of rural e-government projects in India: Status and benefits. Information Technology for Development, 15(1), 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorla, N. (2008). Hurdles in rural e-government projects in India: Lessons for developing countries. Electronic Government, 5(1), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G., & Chau, D. (2005). Developing a generic framework for e-government. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque, M. (2002). E-governance in India: its impacts on relations among citizens, politicians and public servants. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68, 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, S. (2003). Introducing e-government in Bangladesh: Problems and prospects. International Social Science Review, 78(3/4), 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, E., & Hawkins, K. (2003). Bridging Latin America’s digital divide: Government policies and Internet access. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 646–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (2002). E-government in Africa: Promise and practice. Information Polity, 7, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbig, N., Gil-Garcia, J., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, T. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, I., & Yep, R. (2005). E-government in China. Public Administration and Development, 25, 239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in the Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1838–1852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyyryläinen, E. (2004). Electronic government in Finland. In M. Eifert & J. Ole Püschel (Eds.), National electronic government: Comparing governance structures in multi-layer administrations (pp. 46–81). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, J., & Seo, J. (2005). E-government in South Korea: Planning and implementation. Electronic Government, 2(2), 188–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, P. (2003). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 323–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, P., & Thompson, K. (2004). Social information behavior and the democratic process: Information poverty, normative behavior, and electronic government in the United States. Library and Information Science Research, 26(1), 94–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jho, W. (2005). Challenges for e-governance. Protests from civil society on the protection of privacy in e-government in Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(1), 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joia, L., & Zamot, F. (2002). Internet-based reverse auctions by the Brazilian government. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 9(6),1–12. http://www.ejisdc.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaaya, J. (2004). Implementing e-government services in East Africa: Assessing status through content analysis of government websites. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 2(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalathil, S., & Boas, T. (2003). Open networks, closed regimes: The impact of the internet on authoritarian rule. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawtrakul, A., Mulasastra, I., Khampachua, T., & Ruengittinun, S. (2011). The challenges of accelerating connected government and beyond: Thailand perspectives. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 9(2), 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaylor, C., Deshazo, R., & Van Eck, D. (2001). Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly, 18(4), 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke, W., & Wei, K. (2004). Successful e-government in Singapore. Communications of the ACM, 47(6), 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Pan, G., & Pan, S. (2007). Managing IT-enabled transformation in the public sector: A case study on e-government in South Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 338–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klumpp, D. (2002). From websites to e-government in Germany. Electronic Government, 2456, 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koga, T. (2003). Access to government information in Japan: A long way toward electronic government? Government Information Quarterly, 20(1), 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuk, J. (2003). The digital divide and the quality of electronic service delivery in local government in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., & Best, M. (2006). Impact and sustainability of e-government services in developing countries: Lessons learned from Tamil Nadu, India. Information Society, 22, 1–12. http://mikeb.inta.gatech.edu/papers/infosoc.egov.kumar.best.pdf

  • Larsen, E., & Rainie, L. (2002). The rise of the e-citizen: How people use government agencies’ web sites. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassnig, M., & Markus, M. (2003). Usage of e-government services in European regions. Electronic Government, 2739, 143–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lean, O., Zailani, S., Ramayah, T., & Fernando, Y. (2009). Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia. International Journal of Information Management, 29(6), 458–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Lee, K.-S. (2009). The Korean government’s electronic record management reform: The promise and perils of digital democratization. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 525–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Tan, X., & Trimi, S. (2005). Current practices of leading e-government countries. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, K. (2007). The governance of e-government: A governance perspective on the Swedish e-government strategy. Public, Policy and Administration, 22(3), 335–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., Chung, J., & Thorson, S. (2005). E-government in China: Bringing economic development through administrative reform. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 20–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madon, S. (2004). Evaluating the developmental impact of e-governance initiatives. An exploratory framework. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 20(5), 1–13. http://www.ejisdc.org

  • Mahmood, K. (2005). Multipurpose community telecenters for rural development in Pakistan. The Electronic Library 23(2):204-220. http://www.geocities.ws/khalidmahmood/mcts.pdf.

  • Margetts, H. (2006). E-government in Britain—A decade on. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 250–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & El-Toukhy, S. (2012). Blogging for sovereignty: An analysis of Palestinian blogs. In Tatyana Dumova & Richard Fiordo (Eds.), Blogging in the global society: Cultural, political and geographical aspects (pp. 139–151). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal, R., Tolbert, C., Mossberger, K., & Dotterweich, L. (2003). Innovating in digital government in the American states. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 52–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monga, A. (2008). E-government in India: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Administration and Governance, 3(2), 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Cañavate, A., & Chain-Navarro, C. (2004). The world wide web as an information system in Spain’s regional administrations (1997–2000). Government Information Quarterly, 21(2), 198–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Cañavate, A., & Hípola, P. (2011). Electronic administration in Spain: From its beginnings to the present. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 74–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: opportunities and challenges. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1–24. http://www.ejisdc.org

  • Ngulube, P. (2007). The nature and accessibility of e-government in sub-Saharan Africa. International Review of Information Ethics 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2005). The impact of the internet on political activism: Evidence from Europe. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(1), 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D., & Moon, M. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). The e-government imperative. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. (2007). A case study of e-governance initiatives in India. International Information and Library Review, 39(3–4), 176–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2007). Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local governments? An empirical study. Public Administration, 85(2), 449–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett, L. (2004). Electronic government in Britain. In M. Eifert & J. Ole Püschel (Eds.), National electronic government: Comparing governance structures in multi-layer administrations (pp. 13–45). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddick, C. (2004). A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, B. (2007). Whither e-government? Public Administration Review, 67(3), 584–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, W., & Grant, G. (2010). Critical issues pertaining to the planning and implementation of e-government initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 27(1), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2006). E-government in Canada: Transformation for the digital age. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salem, F. (2006). Exploring e-government barriers in the Arab states. Dubai School of Government. http://www.dsg.ae/LinkClick.aspx?link=DSG+Policy+Brief_e-gov_Fadi+Salem_2006.pdf&tabid=308&mid=826&language=en-US.

  • Sang, S., Lee, J.-D., & Lee, J. (2009). E-government adoption in ASEAN: the case of Cambodia. Internet Research, 19(5), 517–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuppan, T. (2009). Local level structural change and e-government in Germany. In C. Reddick (Ed.), Handbook for research on strategies for local e-government adoption and implementation (pp. 17–36). New York: IGI Global Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2002). ‘Establishing’ an inclusive society? Technology, social exclusion and UK government policy making. Journal of Social Policy, 31(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seng, W., Jackson, S., & Philip, G. (2010). Cultural issues in developing E-Government in Malaysia. Behaviour and Information Technology, 29(4), 423–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, P., Fisher, J., & Dawson, L. (2006). E-government services in the local government context: An Australian case study. Business Process Management Journal, 12(1), 88–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafique, F., & Mahmood, K. (2008). Indicators of the emerging information society in Pakistan. Information Development, 24(1), 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D.-H. (2007). A critique of Korean National Information Strategy: Case of national information infrastructures. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 624–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, T. (2007). E-government in Germany. In P. Nixon & V. Koutrakou (Eds.), E-government in Europe: Rebooting the state (pp. 90–102). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solop, F. (2001). Digital democracy comes of age: Internet voting and the 2000 Arizona Democratic primary election. PS: Political Science and Politics, 34(2), 289–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, H. (2002). Prospects and limitation of the e-government initiative in Korea. International Review of Public Administration, 7(2), 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strejcek, G., & Theil, M. (2003). Technology push, legislation pull? E-government in the European Union. Decision Support Systems, 34(3), 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhbaatar, B. (2005). A study on e-government policies in Mongolia. Information and Telecommunication Technologies, 10, 254–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, J., & Leenes, R. (2003). E-voting in Europe: Divergent democratic practice. Information Polity, 8(1–2), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. W., Pan, S., & Lim, E. (2005). Managing stakeholder interest in e-government implementation: Lessons learned from a Singapore e-government project. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(1), 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, H., Matsuura, K., & Sudoh, O. (2005). Vulnerability and information security investment: An empirical analysis of e-local government in Japan. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(1), 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. (1995). The digital economy. Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubman Center of Brown University. 2007. South Korea climbs to top rank in global e-government. http://www.brown.edu/Administration/News_Bureau/2006-07/06-007.html.

  • Tolbert, C., Mossberger, K., & McNeal, R. (2008). Institutions, policy innovation, and e-government in the American states. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 549–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2005). E-government developments on delivering public services among EU cities. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 217–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, L., & Rieck, O. (2005). Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14, 417–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C., Cheung, K, Lee, F., & Ip, R. (2003). Enhancing e-government in developing countries: Managing knowledge through virtual communities. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 14(4), 1–20. http://www.ejisdc.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2003). Dissecting the digital divide: A case study in Egypt. The Information Society, 19, 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerakkody, V., & Choudrie, J. (2005). Exploring e-government in the UK: Challenges, issues and complexities. Journal of Information Science and Technology, 2(2), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlers, T. (2009). The digital world of local government: A comparative analysis of the United States and Germany. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 6(2), 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K., Zhang, C., & Tang, J. . (2012). Internet use and governance in China. In Y-C. Chen and P-Y. Chu (Eds.) Electronic governance and cross-boundary collaboration: Innovations and advancing tools. (pp. 305–324). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yigitcanlar, T., & Baum, S. (2006). E-government and the digital divide. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of e-commerce, e-government, and mobile commerce (pp. 353–358). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonemaru, T. (2004). Electronic government in Japan. In M. Eifert & J. Ole Püschel (Eds.), National electronic government: Comparing governance Structures in multi-layer administrations (pp. 136–181). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Q. (2010). E-government evaluation of delivering public services to citizens among cities in the Yangtze River Delta. International Information and Library Review, 42(3), 208–211.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

    Barney Warf

Authors
  1. Barney Warf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Warf, B. (2013). Global E-Government. In: Global Geographies of the Internet. SpringerBriefs in Geography, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1245-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation