Ecoterrorism: An Ecological-Economic Convergence

  • Ganna Kharlamova
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)


Ecoterrorism is a challenging term because neither threats nor responses are easily defined. Instead, this problem can be solved only by complex means and applying interdisciplinary approaches. Here, we propose modeling ecological-economic complex systems to calculate the possible negative impacts of pollution – and especially intentional pollution – that could be classified as ecoterrorism. The combination of ecological and economic approaches has the potential to establish ecologically safe development of states and regions.


Ecological-economic systems Ecoterrorism Ecological-economic modeling 


  1. 1.
    Aldy JE (2005) An environmental Kuznets curve analysis of U.S. state-level carbon dioxide emissions. Environ Dev Econ 14:48–72Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Hoffman B (2006) Inside terrorism. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hudson RA (2002) Who becomes a terrorist and why: the 1999 government report on profiling terrorists. The Lyons Press, Federal Research DivisionGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kharlamova G (2007) Modeling the best use of investments for minimizing risks of multiple stressors on the environment. In: Multiple stressors: a challenge for the future. Springer, Dordrecht, Chapter 33, pp 441–448Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kharlamova G (2009) Optimizing the management of complex dynamic ecosystems: an ecological-economic modelling approach. In: Abstracts NATO ARW Complex societal dynamics: security challenges and opportunities, Zagreb, 9–11 Dec 2009, pp 21–22Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Long D (2004) Ecoterrorism (Library in a book). Facts on File, New York, pp 21–23Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Moore SR (2003) Terrorism: concepts, causes, and conflict resolution. George Mason University Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution: The Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Fort BelvoirGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pething R (1975) Umwelt ver schmutzung, Wohlfahrt und Umwelt politic in einem Zwei-Sectoren-Gleichgewichs modell. Zietschrift National ekonomie 35:99–124Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shostak L, Badrak O (2000) Macroeconomic model of growth in terms of natural-resources restrictions. Economy of Ukraine 12:46–53Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siebert H (1969) Regional economic growth theory and policy. International Textbook Company, ScrantonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siebert H (1992) Economics of the environment. Theory and policy. Springer, Berlin, p 291Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Solow RM (1957) Technical changes and aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39:312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kiev National Taras Shevchenko UniversityKievUkraine

Personalised recommendations