Skip to main content

Application of the Human Ecosystem Model in Warfare Ecology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Warfare Ecology

Abstract

Warfare affects coupled human-natural systems. The relative effects and their distribution depend upon a variety of pre-existing conditions; specific activities prior to, during, and after violent conflict; and the scales of these activities over time and space. Warfare implies not only intended consequences, but also unintended ones, and both negative and positive outcomes. Social ecological models provide systematic means by which differential effects can be measured, mapped, and predicted. Strand-by-strand analyses of whole-system effects on different populations and ecosystems are possible. Pre-existing conditions in biophysical resources, socioeconomic resources, and cultural resources influence not only what are defined as potentially contested territory and targets for violence, but also post-war outcomes. This paper describes the application of one social ecological model, the Human Ecosystem Model, to preparation for war, violent conflict, and post-war activities; and presents means by which social ecological models can improve understanding of the coupled human-natural systems outcomes of war.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Detailed information on the structure of the refugee camps’ organizational and governance structure is available at http://www.tbbc.org/camps/management.htm

References

  1. Allen TFH, Hoekstra TW (1992) Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Base Gagetown Community History Association (Dec 3, 1952) http://www.bgcha.ca/

  3. Burch WR Jr, DeLuca DR (1984) Measuring the social impact of natural resource policies. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  4. Catton WR Jr (1982) Overshoot: the ecological basis of revolutionary change. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  5. Costanza R, Wainger L, Folke C, Maler KG (1993) Modeling complex ecological and economic systems: towards an evolutionary, dynamic understanding of people and nature. Bioscience 43(8):545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalton SE, McLean WR (2005) Online atlas of social ecological conditions in the Canaan-Washademoak watershed. www.unb.ca/enviro

  7. Duncan OD (1964) Social organization and the ecosystem. In: Robert F (ed.) Handbook of modern sociology. Rand McNally, New York, pp 36–82

    Google Scholar 

  8. Faris REL (1967) Chicago sociology 1920–1932. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  9. Field DR, Burch WR Jr (1988) Rural sociology and the environment. Social Ecology Press, Middleton

    Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman G (2009) The next hundred years: a forecast for the 21st century. Doubleday Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Homer-Dixon TF (1994) Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: evidence from cases. Int Sec 19:5–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Machlis GE (1992) The contribution of sociology to biodiversity research and management. Biol Conserv 61:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Machlis GE, Hanson T (2008) Warfare ecology. Bioscience 58(8):729–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Machlis GE, Tichnell DL (1985) The state of the world’s parks: an international assessment of resource management, policy, and research. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  15. Machlis GE, Force JE, Dalton SE (1994). Monitoring social indicators for ecosystem management (Technical Paper 43-0E00-4-9186): Interior Columbia River Basin Project

    Google Scholar 

  16. Machlis GE, Force JE, Burch WR Jr (1997) The human ecosystem part I: the human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management. Soc Nat Resour 10(4):347–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Machlis GE, Burch WR Jr, Force JE (forthcoming) The structure and dynamics of human ecosystems. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  18. McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1993) Humans as components of ecosystems: a synthesis. In: McDonnell MJ, Picket STA (eds.) Humans as components of ecosystems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Micklin M (1977) The ecological perspective in the social sciences: a comparative overview. Paper presented at the conference on human ecology, Seattle, Oct 1977

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thailand Burma Border Consortium (2009) http://www.tbbc.org/camps/management.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn E. Dalton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dalton, S.E. (2011). Application of the Human Ecosystem Model in Warfare Ecology. In: Machlis, G., Hanson, T., Špirić, Z., McKendry, J. (eds) Warfare Ecology. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1214-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics