Probabilities in Branching Structures
A common, natural view about probabilities, shared by philosophers of diverse persuasions, is that probabilities are graded possibilities. On this view, which I will presuppose, there are no probabilities without underlying possibilities, and there is room for different notions of probability at least to the extent that there are different underlying notions of possibility.
KeywordsProbability Space Sample Space Real Possibility Choice Point Metaphysical Possibility
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
I would like to thank the audience and my co-symposiasts at the ESF Workshop Physical and Philosophical Perspectives on Probability, Explanation and Time, Zeist, 20 October 2009, for helpful discussions.
- Belnap, N. (1999). Concrete transitions. In Meggle, G., editor, Actions, Norms, Values: Discussions with Georg Henrik von Wright, pages 227–236. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Belnap, N. (2002b). EPR-like “funny business” in the theory of branching spacetimes. In Placek, T. and Butterfield, J., editors, Non-locality and Modality, pages 293–315. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F., editors (1984). Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. II. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
- McCall, S. (1990). Choice trees. In Dunn, J. and Gupta, A., editors, Truth or Consequences. Essays in Honor of Nuel Belnap, pages 231–244. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Popper, K. (1982). Quantum Theory and the Schism of Physics. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
- Prior, A. N. (1957). Time and Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Prior, A. N. (1967). Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Thomason, R. H. (1984). Combinations of tense and modality. In Gabbay and Guenthner (1984), pages 135–165.Google Scholar
- von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and Action. A Logical Inquiry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Weyl, H. (1940). The ghost of modality. In Farber, M., editor, Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl, pages 278–303. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar