Advertisement

The Gibbs Paradox Revisited

  • Dennis Dieks
Conference paper
Part of the The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective book series (PSEP, volume 2)

Abstract

The Gibbs paradox has frequently been interpreted as a sign that particles of the same kind are fundamentally indistinguishable; and that quantum mechanics, with its identical fermions and bosons, is indispensable for making sense of this. In this article we shall argue, on the contrary, that analysis of the paradox supports the idea that classical particles are always distinguishable. Perhaps surprisingly, this analysis extends to quantum mechanics: even according to quantum mechanics there can be distinguishable particles of the same kind. Our most important general conclusion will accordingly be that the universally accepted notion that quantum particles of the same kind are necessarily indistinguishable rests on a confusion about how particles are represented in quantum theory.

Keywords

Wave Packet Classical Limit Classical Physic Quantum Particle Classical Particle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [1]
    Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu and Frank Laloe, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 2. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience 1978, Ch. XIV.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Dennis Dieks, “Quantum Statistics, Identical Particles and Correlations”, in: Synthese, 82, 1990, pp. 127-155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Dennis Dieks and Marijn Versteegh, “Identical Particles and Weak Discernibility”, in: Foundations of Physics, 38, 2008, pp. 923-934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Dennis Dieks, “Are ‘Identical Quantum Particles’ Weakly Discernible Objects?”, in: Mauricio Suarez, Mauro Dorato and Miklos Redei (Eds.), EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association, Volume 2. Heidelberg: Springer 2010.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Dennis Dieks and Andrea Lubberdink, “How Classical Particles Emerge From the Quantum World”, in: Foundations of Physics, 2011, to appear; DOI 10.1007/s10701-010-9515-2.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Steven French and Decio Krause, Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Andrea Lubberdink, “Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics”, at http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.4642
  8. [8]
    N.G. van Kampen, “The Gibbs Paradox”, in: W.E. Parry (Ed.), Essays in Theoretical Physics. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1984, pp. 303-312.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Wojciech H. Zurek, “Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical Revisited”, in: B. Duplantier, J.-M. Raimond and M. Rivasseau (Eds.), Quantum Decoherence, Poincaré Seminar 2005 (Progress in Mathematical Physics, vol. 48). Basel: Birkhäuser 2007, pp. 1-31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for History and Foundations of ScienceUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations