Advertisement

Learning Nature of Science Through Socioscientific Issues

  • Siu Ling Wong
  • Zhihong Wan
  • Maurice Man Wai Cheng
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education book series (CTISE, volume 39)

Abstract

A series of reforms in science education in Hong Kong started at the turn of the twenty-first century. In line with international trends, science education in Hong Kong has undergone considerable changes in the last decade since the implementation of the revised junior secondary science curriculum (grades 7–9) (Curriculum Development Council [CDC], 1998). The new curriculum encourages teachers to conduct scientific investigations in their classes, advocates scientific investigation as a desired means of learning scientific knowledge, and highlights the development of inquiry practices and generic skills such as collaboration and communication. Most importantly, it was the first local science curriculum that embraced understanding of nature of science (NOS), for example, being “able to appreciate and understand the evolutionary nature of scientific knowledge” (CDC, 1998, p. 3) was stated as one of its broad curriculum aims. In the first topic, “What is science?”, teachers are expected to discuss with students some features about science, for example, its scope and limitations, some typical features about scientific investigations, for example, fair testing, control of variables, predictions, hypothesis, inferences, and conclusions. Such an emphasis on NOS was further supported in the revised secondary 4 and 5 (grade 10 and 11) physics, chemistry, and biology curricula (CDC, 2002). Scientific investigation continued to be an important component while the scope of NOS was slightly extended to include recognition of the usefulness and limitations of science as well as the interactions between science, technology, and society (STS).

Keywords

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Instructional Material Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Patient Socioscientific Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science & Education, 82, 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students “ideas-about-science”: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science & Education, 88, 655–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science & Education, 91(3), 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianchini, J. A., Johnston, C. C., Oram, S. Y., & Cavazos, L. M. (2003). Learning to teach science in contemporary and equitable ways: The successes and struggles of first-year science teachers. Science & Education, 87, 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brickhouse, N. W., & Bodner, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 471–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CDC. (1998). Science syllabus for secondary 1–3. Hong Kong: Curriculum Development Council.Google Scholar
  8. CDC. (2002). Physics/Chemistry/Biology curriculum guide (Secondary 4–5). Hong Kong: Curriculum Development Council. Retrieved August 15, 2008, from http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeID=2824&langno.
  9. CDC-HKEAA. (2007). Physics/Chemistry/Biology/Integrated science curriculum guide and assessment guide (Secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Curriculum Development Council and Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority.Google Scholar
  10. Higgins, J., & Learoyd, S. (Producer). (2003, May 29). SARS: The true story [Television broadcast]. North Sydney, N.S.W.: BBC Worldwide.Google Scholar
  11. Hodson, D. (2006). Why we should prioritize learning about science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6, 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The influence of explicit/reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kolstoe, S. D. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 645–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (1998). Science teacher beliefs and intentions to implement science-technology-society (STS) in the classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rubba, P. A., & Harkness, W. L. (1993). Examination of preservice and in-service secondary ­science teachers’ beliefs about science-technology-society interactions. Science & Education, 77, 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ryder, J. (2002). School science education for citizenship: Strategies for teaching about the epistemology of science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(6), 637–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). “It’s the nature of the beast”: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 205–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tao, P. K. (2002). A study of students’ focal awareness when studying science stories designed for fostering understanding of the nature of science. Research in Science Education, 32, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science & Education, 6, 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tsai, C. C. (2001). A science teacher’s reflections and knowledge growth about STS instruction after actual implementation. Science & Education, 86, 23–41.Google Scholar
  27. Wong, S. L., Hodson, D., Kwan, J., & Yung, B. H. W. (2008). Turning crisis into opportunity: Enhancing student teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry through a case study of the scientific research in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1417–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wong, S. L., Kwan, J., Hodson, D., & Yung, B. H. W. (2009). Turning crisis into opportunity: Nature of science and scientific inquiry as illustrated in the scientific research on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. Science & Education, 18, 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wong, S. L., Yung, B. H. W., & Cheng, M. W. (2010). A blow to a decade of effort on promoting teaching of nature of science. In Y.-J. Lee (Ed.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in Asia (pp. 259–276). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Wong, S. L., Yung, B. H. W., Cheng, M. W., Lam, K. L., & Hodson, D. (2006). Setting the stage for developing pre-service teachers’ conceptions of good science teaching: The role of classroom video. International Journal of Science Education., 28(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science & Education, 89(3), 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V.  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siu Ling Wong
    • 1
  • Zhihong Wan
    • 2
  • Maurice Man Wai Cheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong
  2. 2.Department of Science and Environmental StudiesHong Kong Institute of EducationTai PoHong Kong

Personalised recommendations